PPT-The Amphibian Assessment Process

Background to Amphibians on the IUCN Red List Global Amphibian Assessment GAA Partnership between IUCN CI and NatureServe Initiated in 2001 Concluded first global assessment in 2004 with the publication of results in . Alex Smith and David M Green Smith M A and Green D M 2005 Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation are all amphibian populations metapopulations Ecography 28 110 128 Amphibians are frequently characterized as h substances which may interfere with the normal function of the conserved structure and functions of thyroid systems. It is not intended de evidence that thyroid regulated rbed to warrant more definit Evan H Campbell Grant. Northeast Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative. US Geological Survey . Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. David E. Green, DVM. US Geological Survey . National Wildlife Health Center. Chytridiomycosis. . fungus . dynamics in . wildlife. Gabriela Rios-Sotelo. Vance . Vredenburg. Lab. San Francisco State University. Amphibian . diversity. Emerging disease. Number 1 most threatened vertebrate. Graham Fews. West midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory. UKAS Technical Assessor. Disclaimer. UKAS Technical Assessors do not offer consultancy.. The views presented are my own and do not necessarily portray those of UKAS.. Polymelia. Some Malformations. Amelia. Ectromelia. Anophthalmia. Why are amphibians so susceptible to mutations?. What is causing the malformations?. . North American Reporting Center. environnments. Lilia . Cheniti. . Belcadhi. , PRINCE, Research Unit, ISITC, University of Sousse, Tunisia. Serge . Garlatti. , Computer Science Department, Telecom Bretagne, France. Outline. General context. 6!Process Pattern Types! Process Assessment and Improvement!!"Standard CMMI Assessment Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) Progress Update. . Ministry of Planning . & Economic Affairs. Outline. Coordinating structure. Process &. Methodology . Key . o. utputs and findings. Challenges and Successes. Next Steps . Tebuconazole. inhibit the growth of the amphibian . chytrid. fungus?. Breanne Myers. 1,2. , . Bradi. Voigt. 1,3. , Tara Chestnut. 1,4. , Andrew R Blaustein. 1,4,5. , . 1. Oregon State University, College of Science; . Concerns. Teachers. Will the project meet education standards?. What will the students get out of the project?. How will the data be used?. Will we be able to see/use all of the data in the classroom?. Evan H Campbell Grant. Northeast Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative. US Geological Survey . Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. David E. Green, DVM. US Geological Survey . National Wildlife Health Center. Executive Sponsor: Larry Winter. Team Leader: Jill Chaffee. Team Members:. Melissa . Christopherson – Chippewa County. Dawn . Dachel. – Consumer Representative. Tim Easker – Chippewa County . the Chytrid Fungus Frog Pathogen. Authors: Douglas . Stemke. , Ben C. . Loschky. Citation: Douglas . Stemke. , Ben C. . Loschky. . 2012. Batrachochytrium . dendrobatidis. the chytrid fungus frog pathogen..