PPT-Evaluating Moral Arguments

1 A statement is   aan assertion about morality ban assertion without a truth value can assertion that something is or is not the case da claim that cannot be verified 2 The . In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project it is useful to consider the following questions To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal ?. Common Arguments. Debate Preview?. Allen . Hainline. Reasonable Faith UTD. September 26, 2013. www.OriginsDiscussion.info. Let’s go out to eat with ASH after the debate. Outline. More Fine-Tuning discussion. Adam Crymble. Plan for Today. Background . lecture. Discussion of experience with digital archives. Workshop: evaluating a historical website. Time to start drafting blog post. Terminology. Archive. Evaluating Sources. Concepts You Will Learn:. Evaluating the condition of food. Repackaging food. Loading and distributing food safely. Which of . These Cans Should . be . Discarded. ?. Evaluating The Condition Of Food. . WITNESSING. AND . EVANGELISM. Lesson 12 for June 23, 2012.  . The . Bible shows that we must evaluate (examine) ourselves, the Church members and the Church itself. Why is this evaluation necessary. View as slide show. Adapted from AdPrin.com. A two-sided ad: effective?. “At first you think it is the homeliest thing you ever saw. But pretty soon you get to love her shape. And after awhile, no other car looks right.. fashionable, arguments on the farm: an Argument from the Nature of Right and The divine command theory of the nature of right and wrong combines two advantages not jointly possessed by any of its non . Structuring arguments. Defines which parts go where. Logical arguments described as:. Inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning:. Inductive reasoning. . Process of generalizing on the basis of a number of specific examples. In connection with “Choices” in Harper Lee’s . To Kill a Mockingbird. Moral Dilemma. A train is about to . crash off the track, . killing many people. You can pull a lever that will switch the train . Overview. What is science?. Science vs. pseudoscience. Scientific . method and . critique. How do we generate research ideas?. Ideas from theory. Ideas from other sources. How do we evaluate research ideas?. Day 1: Fertilization. Days 7-10: Blastocyst is in uterus and is a “ball of cells. Weeks 2-8: Organs and limb buds begin to develop. Weeks 12-16: “Quickening” begins, mother can feel fetus’s movements, fetus is approx. 5 ½ inches long. What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “evaluating information”? What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “evaluating information”? Comprehension Reliability Author Authority Analyzing Bias Fiske & Rai, 2015. Pleasing Gods. Human and animal sacrifice. Self-sacrifice. Religion and Morality . (McKay & Whitehouse, 2015) . 2. nd. look at theory. Morality = “the intentions, motivations, evaluations, and conjoined emotions that operate to realize ideal models of social relationships in a culturally meaningful manner” (p. 135). Cosmological argument. Teleological argument. Moral argument. Resurrection. Personal Experience. Kalam Cosmological Argument. The argument:. Everything that . begins to exist. has a cause. The universe began to exist .