/
&fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai Suraerv (1997) 35. 170-172 I &fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai Suraerv (1997) 35. 170-172 I

&fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai Suraerv (1997) 35. 170-172 I - PDF document

pasty-toler
pasty-toler . @pasty-toler
Follow
391 views
Uploaded On 2017-02-01

&fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai Suraerv (1997) 35. 170-172 I - PPT Presentation

Protection of the lingual nerve during operations on the third molar a simple method S AppiahAnane M G AppiahAnane Garston Dental Clinic Liverpool North Mersey Community NHS Trust Abercro ID: 516241

Protection the lingual nerve

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "&fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

&fish Journal of Oral and Maxillofaciai Suraerv (1997) 35. 170-172 I Protection of the lingual nerve during operations on the third molar: a simple method S. Appiah-Anane, M. G. Appiah-Anane Garston Dental Clinic, Liverpool; North Mersey Community (NHS) Trust, Abercromby Health Centre, Liverpool, UK SUMMARY. The object of the study was to assess the incidence of 170 Table 1 -Age and sex of study group Protection of the lingual nerve during operations on the mandibular third molar 171 Sex Age (years) 14-19 Total Male 12 I 2 Female 20 IO 5 I 2 I 213 Total 32 Table2- Classification of wisdom teeth according to state of eruption and impaction Vertical Distoangular Mesioangular Horizontal who had sustained lingual damage after the extraction of wisdom teeth were compensated with awards of El2000 and &I4000 because the operations had ‘negligently performed’.7 After a recent case in Ireland damages of &40000 were awarded.’ Traditionally, the main purpose of placing a lingual retractor CONCLUSION Retention of the lingual cuff of tissue affords optimum protection for the lingual nerve during removal of mandibular third molars. In this study only one of the 362 patients (who had wisdom teeth removed in total) had transient lingual sensory loss. There was no permanent damage to a lingual nerve. Acknowledgement We thank Mrs Hania Harte for independently assessing patients in this study. References 1. Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal 172 British Journal of Oral and MaxiNofacial Surgery 6. Howe G. Minor oral surgery, 3rd edn. Bristol; John Wright, 1992;339:801. 8. Wake MJC. Medicolegal issues - thirty-fourth consultants discussion 156-161. 9. Rees RT. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Br Dent 42: 565-561. The Authors Correspondence and requests for reprints