/
Military decision-maker and head of language classes: Military decision-maker and head of language classes:

Military decision-maker and head of language classes: - PowerPoint Presentation

pasty-toler
pasty-toler . @pasty-toler
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-01-09

Military decision-maker and head of language classes: - PPT Presentation

Military decisionmaker and head of language classes two commanders on the same boat SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT SENDER HELPER OPPONENT ID: 772375

sender french subject object french sender object subject language receiver professional years level military opponent practice occasional school education

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Military decision-maker and head of lang..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Military decision-maker and head of language classes:two commanders on the same boat

SENDER HELPEROPPONENTRECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT

SENDER HELPEROPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT

SENDER HELPEROPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT  Linguistic competency Military learner

SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT  Linguistic competency Military learner

SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT PRINCESS  FREEDOM KING KNIGHT

HEAD OF THE LANGUAGE CLASS PROFESSOR  l inguistic competency m ilitary learner SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT mission & pedagogical material psycholinguistic difficulties

MILITARY HIERARCHY HEAD OF THE LANGUAGE CLASS  l inguistic competency m ilitary learner SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT professor m ission poorly defined

(academic profile + starting level)pedagogy used = length of training

Officer 1 Officer 2 Asian European 30 years old 45 years old continued higher education high school education daily use of English (professional and academic) survival English (occasional professional) Very recent French language learning in private lessons French learned at school beginner French level intermediate French level no French practice occasional French practice

Officer 1 Officer 2 Asian European 30 years old 45 years old continued higher education high school education daily use of English (professional and academic) survival English (occasional professional) Very recent French language learning in private lessons French learned at school beginner French level intermediate French level no French practice occasional French practice

Officer 1 Officer 2 Asian European 30 years old 45 years old continued higher education high school education daily use of English (professional and academic) survival English (occasional professional) Very recent French language learning in private lessons French learned at school beginner French level intermediate French level no French practice occasional French practice

MILITARY HIERARCHY HEAD OF THE LANGUAGE CLASS  l inguistic competency m ilitary learner SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT professor m ission poorly defined

MILITARY HIERARCHY HEAD OF THE LANGUAGE CLASS  l inguistic competency m ilitary learner SENDER HELPER OPPONENT RECEIVER OBJECT SUBJECT professor m ission poorly defined inter-allied communication

three ways of better identifying the aim of our workcontact with the professional future of the learners we train: a brainstorming session where the former officers from the program compare what they learned during their training with their real needs during their schooling at the Ecole de guerrean external perspective:Master students each year do an internship study on adequacy of the pedagogical methods, course content, and the general organization of the program with the real needs of the officers the long term: contact with officers who, in general 5 or 10 years after studying at the Ecole de guerre, return to Paris as Defense Attaché

upstream downstream