/
1 Comparison of The Joint Commission 1 Comparison of The Joint Commission

1 Comparison of The Joint Commission - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
395 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-21

1 Comparison of The Joint Commission - PPT Presentation

and DNV GL HCs National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations NIAHO MS Standards Kathy Matzka CPMSM CPCS 2 History TJC NIAHO 1952 began Unique statutory ID: 659239

niaho privileges medical clinical privileges niaho clinical medical current standards hospital professional surgical staff data applicant required practitioner review

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Comparison of The Joint Commission" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

Comparison of The Joint Commission and DNV- GL HC’s National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations (NIAHO℠) MS Standards

Kathy Matzka, CPMSM, CPCSSlide2

2

History TJC NIAHO

1952 began

Unique statutory

hospital deeming authority 1965 Medicare statuteJuly 15, 2008, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 became law 11/09 – CMS approval 4,546 Hospital and CAH in 20114,429 Hospital and CAH in 2013 (90% of accredited hospitals)4,032 Hospital and CAH in 2016 (88% of accredited hospitals)

12/19/07 Application to CMS

09/08 CMS approval

94 Hospital and CAH on 7/14/10

393 Hospital and CAH on 4/17/2016Slide3

3

ProcessTJC NIAHO

Three year survey

Standards directly related to the CMS as well as self-defined

Annual Survey

Most MS standards directly related to the CMSISO 9001 quality managementSlide4

4

Scoring ProcessTJC NIAHO

Three-point scale:

0 = insufficient compliance

1 = partial compliance

2 = satisfactory compliance IconsDocumentation requiredSituational decision rules applyDirect impact requirements applyCategory A requirementCategory C requirement (based on # of times does not meet standard)Measurement of Success needed

Standards Scored as

Meets requirements

Nonconformity Category I Conditional level – Egregious non-compliance

Nonconformity Category I -Noncompliant

Nonconformity Category II – Occasional or isolated lapse in compliance

Immediate Jeopardy - Immediate threat to patient safety

No aggregate scoringSlide5

5

Appointment Timeframe TJC NIAHO

Two years

Three years if state law does not addressSlide6

6

Continuing Medical Education TJC NIAHO

LIPs and other practitioners privileged through the medical staff process must participate in CE

Participation must be documented and considered in decisions about reappointment, renewal, or revision of individual clinical privileges

All with privileges participate in CE that is at least in part related to their clinical privileges

CME considered in decisions about reappointment or renewal or revision of clinical privileges

Action on an individual’s application for appointment /reappointment or initial or subsequent clinical privileges is withheld until the information is available and verifiedSlide7

7

Current CompetenceTJC NIAHO

The hospital verifies in writing and from the primary source, whenever feasible, or from a CVO, information concerning the current competence

Evaluate data from other organizations where the applicant currently has privileges, if available

Initial - MS qualifications include verification of current competence

Reap - Review of individual

performance

data for variation from

benchmark Variations to peer review for

determination of validity, written explanation of findings and, if appropriate, an action plan

to include

improvement strategiesSlide8

8

Malpractice HistoryTJC NIAHO

MS evaluates involvement in a professional liability action, including final judgments and settlements involving a practitioner

Must evaluate any evidence of an unusual pattern or an excessive number of professional liability actions resulting in a final judgment against the applicant

Review of involvement in any professional liability action at initial and reappointment Slide9

9

Peer RecommendationsTJC NIAHO

Required at initial, reap, consideration of termination, or revision/revocation of clinical privileges

Address the relevant training and experience, current competence, and any effects of health status on privileges being requested

Include evaluation of the applicant’s medical knowledge, technical and clinical skills, clinical judgment, communication skills, interpersonal skills, and professionalism

Obtained from a practitioner in the same professional discipline as the applicant with personal knowledge of the applicant’s ability to practiceList of appropriate sources

Two peer

recommenda-tions

required at initial appointmentSlide10

10

Clinical PrivilegesTJC NIAHO

PSV for current licensure or certification

PSV of relevant training

Evidence of physical ability to perform the requested privilege

If available, data from professional practice review from other organization where the applicant currently has privilegesRecommendations from peers/facultyOn renewal, review of the applicant’s performance within the hospital

All

permitted

by the organization and by law to provide patient care services

independently have

delineated clinical privileges

If

available and/or required by the

MS, a

review

of individual

performance data variation from criteria determined by the medical staff to identify need for

training or

proctoring that may be requiredSlide11

11

TelemedicineTJC NIAHO

3 choices

The originating site can fully privilege and credential the practitioner according to MS standards or

Use credentialing information from the distant site if the distant site is a Joint Commission-accredited organization or

Use credentialing and privileging decision from the Joint Commission-accredited distant siteMedical staff at both sites make recommendation for services to be provided via telemedicineFor non-deeming, can be via contract only if TJC accredited entity

2

choices

The originating site can fully privilege and credential the practitioner according to

MS standards

or

Use credentialing and privileging decision

from telemedicine entity or distant

site

Medicare participating hospital

When

services

provided

by a contracted entity,

GB must

identify

criteria

for selection and procurement of

services

and

how to evaluate

the

entitySlide12

12

Temporary PrivilegesTJC NIAHO

120 days for new applicant with complete file awaiting MEC approval

Time as specified in bylaws for patient care need

On recommendation of MS President or designee

No successful challenges to licensure or registration; involuntary termination of MS appointment; involuntary limitation, reduction, denial, or loss of clinical privileges

Not exceed 120 days

Locum

tenens

not

to exceed

6 months

On r

ecommendation

of a

MEC member, MS president or

medical director (as defined

by MS

U

rgent

patient care need

Complete application w/o negative

or

adverse information

before action by the medical staff or governing bodySlide13

13

Temporary PrivilegesTJC NIAHO

Patient care need verify

Current licensure

Current competence

New Applicant verifyCurrent licensure Relevant training or experience Current competence

Ability to perform the privileges requested

Other criteria required by medical staff bylaws

NPDB

In all cases verify

education

(AMA/AOA

Profile OK

current competence

primary verification of State professional

licenses

professional

references (including current

competence)

Database

profiles from AMA, AOA, NPDB, and OIG Medicare/Medicaid ExclusionsSlide14

14

Allied Health ProfessionalsTJC NIAHO

LIPs through MS process

Non-LIP APRNs and PAs HR or MS if not providing a medical level of care

If State law allows, MS may include DPM, OD, DC, PA, CRNA, NM, APRN, DMD, PHD or other designated professionals approved by MS and Board and eligible for appointmentSlide15

15

Executive CommitteeTJC NIAHO

10 EPs outlining responsibilities, structure, function

If MS has an executive committee, a majority of the members of the committee shall be doctors of medicine or osteopathy

CEO and the nurse executive of the organization or designee shall attend each meeting on an ex-officio basis, with or without voteSlide16

16

NotificationsTJC NIAHO

The decision to grant, deny, revise, or revoke privilege(s) is disseminated and made available to all appropriate internal and external persons or entities, as defined by the hospital and applicable law

A current roster listing each practitioner’s specific surgical privileges must be available in the surgical suite and scheduling area

Include surgeons with suspended surgical privileges or whose surgical privileges have been restrictedSlide17

17

Surgical PrivilegesTJC NIAHO

Included in general category for privileges

All practitioners performing surgery

have

surgical privileges established by the department of surgery and medical staff and approved by the governing bodyPrivileges for general surgery and surgical subspecialties defined with established criteria approved by

MS

Privileges correspond with established

competencies of each

practitionerSlide18

18

Automatic SuspensionTJC NIAHO

The medical staff bylaws include

description of indications for automatic suspension or summary suspension of a practitioner’s medical staff membership or clinical privileges

description of when automatic suspension or summary suspension procedures are implemented

The medical staff will define the criteria and have a mechanism for consideration of automatic suspension of clinical privileges of a practitioner at a minimum when:

revocation/restriction of professional

license

DEA certificate has been revoked, suspended or on probation

Failure to maintain the minimum specified amount of professional liability insurance

non-compliance with written medical record delinquency or deficiency

requirements

Mechanism for immediate and automatic suspension of clinical privileges due to the termination or revocation of the practitioner’s Medicare or Medicaid statusSlide19

19

QA/PI DataTJC NIAHO

FPPE

OPPE

Medical Assessment

BloodMedicationOperative and other procedure(s)Appropriateness of clinical practice patternsSignificant departures from established patterns of clinical practiceUse of criteria for autopsiesSentinel event dataPatient safety data

Practitioner specific performance data is required and must be rate-based with comparative peer or national data available for comparison.

Blood use

Prescribing of medications

Surgical Case Review

Specific departmental indicators

Moderate Sedation Outcomes

Anesthesia events

Appropriateness of care for non-invasive procedures/interventions

Utilization data

Significant deviations from established standards of practice

Timely and legible completion of patients’ medical records

Variants analyzed for statistical significanceSlide20

20

Addressed by TJC, Not NIAHO

Verification of applicant identity

Use of CVO (DNV does allow – is addressed under telemedicine)

Health status (DNV only under surgical privileges)Applicant required to provide info re: previously successful or currently pending challenges to licensure or voluntary relinquishment, felony convictionsLeadership standards place additional responsibilities on MSResidency program requirementsSlide21

21

Addressed by NIAHO, not TJC

Receipt

of database

profile from OIG - Medicare/Medicaid Exclusions initial/reappointment/temporary privilegesSlide22

22

Resources

Standards: NIAHO

®

Standards

, Interpretive Guidelines, or Accreditation Process www.dnvaccreditation.comJointcomission.orgSlide23

Questions to Consider…Will our reputation in the community suffer if we change? (Are minimal standards sufficient in today’s healthcare climate?)Contracts with insurers may require certain accreditation and may need renegotiation Will there be a saving in direct and indirect accreditation costs?23Slide24

24

Questions