/
Ann Swanson Executive Director Ann Swanson Executive Director

Ann Swanson Executive Director - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
372 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-05

Ann Swanson Executive Director - PPT Presentation

Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading Chesapeake Bay Commission TriState Legislative Commission PA MD VA Legislative Partner of Chesapeake Bay Program ID: 715748

cost trading sigps bay trading cost bay sigps nutrient costs chesapeake load amp state water basin quality stormwater tmdl

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Ann Swanson Executive Director" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Ann SwansonExecutive DirectorChesapeake Bay CommissionMay 2012

Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake

The Economics of Nutrient TradingSlide2

Chesapeake Bay CommissionTri-State Legislative Commission

PA, MD, VALegislative Partner of Chesapeake Bay Program7 Members Each (21 total)2 Senate3 HouseGovernor or DesigneeCitizen At-Large32 years of Policy for the BaySlide3

The Chesapeake Bay is impaired

and subject to a federally imposed TMDL.Slide4

Nutrient Trading is

One Possible SolutionIn our region, 4 states have nutrient trading programsPennsylvaniaMarylandVirginiaWest VirginiaSlide5

How Can Trading Reduce Costs?Slide6

Our Approach to the TaskProject Development & Funding

Economics Analysis, Modeling and Report PreparationProject Management, Policy & Technical ExpertiseTransparency, Accuracy & ApplicabilityEconomics of Trading Advisory CouncilSlide7

Purpose of the StudyIs:

To investigate the POTENTIAL cost savingsTo estimate how potential savings are affected by different trading scenariosIs NOT: To model specific state programsTo predict future trading levelsSlide8

Summary of FindingsSlide9

Why Potential Cost Savings?Slide10

A Market Requires

Defined ProductBuyerSellerVoluntary EntryIn Reality . . .Markets Do Not Work PerfectlyPolicymakers must consider factors other than cost

A

Marketplace

Requires

Rules and Boundaries

Information

AccessSlide11

Market Restrictions

Baseline for Agriculture TMDL implementationBaseline for Significant Point Sources TMDL WLA or 2010 loadProtection of Local Water Quality Trades limited to 9M lbs N; 200,000 lbs PTrading Ratio

2:1

Transaction Costs

38%

Maintain Productive Farmland

maximum 25% retirementSlide12

Nutrient Trading ScenariosGeography

3 scenariosIn-Basin-StateIn-StateIn-BasinWatershed-wideSlide13

Nutrient Trading ScenariosSources

3 short term scenarios SigPS-Only SigPS-AgrNPS SigPS-AgrNPS-Urban1 long term scenario

Offset-OnlySlide14

Significant Point Sources (SigPS)475 municipal and industrial facilities

16 tiers of treatment based on:8, 5 or 3 mg/L N1, 0.5 or 0.1 mg/L PAnnualized costs (capital and O&M) based on EPA’s ongoing cost analysisControl Projects, Load Reductions and Annual Costs

Jane Thomas

, ian.umces.edu/

imagelibrary

Slide15

Control Projects, Load Reductions and Annual CostsAgricultural and

Urban Stormwater BMPsAnnualized unit costs ($/ac/yr)Includes land, installation and O&MSlide16

Aligning Our WorkThe Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model Phase 5.3.2

Provided Key InputsWatershed network and segmentationLand use/land coverDelivered loadsBMP nutrient removal ratesAcres of BMP implementationSlide17

Analytical Framework

9 step process to identify the least-cost solution (representing the trading outcome) Optimization model used always seeks least cost BMPs first as available within other constraints (basin, state, local water quality, etc.) Slide18

Cost-Effectiveness of Ag BMPs and Stormwater for N Removal Vary Widely

*Value ranges for dry ponds and street sweeping are above $1,000/lbUsing N as an example Slide19

The FindingsSlide20

Cost of Meeting

SigPS Load Reduction TargetsNo-Trading v. In-Basin-State TradingSlide21

Cost of Meeting SigPS Load Reduction TargetsSlide22

Cost of Meeting SigPS and Regulated Urban

Stormwater Load Reduction TargetsSlide23

Cost of Offsets for Added Capacity at Municipal SigPSLong Term Offset-Only Trading ScenariosSlide24

Summary of FindingsSlide25

Keys to a Successful Trading Program

VerificationLocal Water Quality ProtectionMeasurable and Enforceable CapSlide26

Ann SwansonExecutive DirectorChesapeake Bay Commission410-263-3420aswanson@chesbay.us

www.chesbay.usQuestions?