Susan LoessPerez MS CIP CCRC Director of Research Compliance Office of Research Services Graduate Thesis and Dissertation Conference February 6 2016 Purpose of IRB What Requires Review Levels of Review ID: 548202
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Human Subjects Research: The DePaul IRB ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Human Subjects Research: The DePaul IRB Process and Protocol Preparation Guidance
Susan Loess-Perez, MS, CIP, CCRC
Director of Research Compliance
Office of Research Services
Graduate Thesis and Dissertation Conference
February 6, 2016Slide2
Purpose of IRBWhat Requires Review
Levels of Review
Non-ReviewableExemptExpeditedFullShort Summary of DePaul ProcessGuidelines for submissionCommon General ProblemsCommon IRB ConcernsConsent Principles and ConcernsContact InformationQ &A
TopicsSlide3
A committee that has been formally designated to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans with the
aim to protect the rights and welfare of the research subjects.
Has authority to approve, require modifications, or disapprove researchThe Purpose of the IRBSlide4
The IRB and the Human Subject Protections Program
Researchers
FWA InstitutionOffice of Research ServicesLocal Review Boards/Departmental ReviewSupport Offices ORS-Grants and ContractsComplianceBilling
General Counsel
Institutional Review Board
Human Subjects Protection ProgramSlide5
All human subject research conducted by DePaul faculty, staff, or students, whether conducted at DePaul or in other locations.
Activities must meet the definition of research contained in the
federal regulations.Activities must involve human subjects as defined in the federal regulations.What Requires IRB Review?Slide6
Is what I am doing research?Does this activity involve a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable
knowledge?
Am I using a systematic approach, such as scientific methods, to collect and analyze data?Is the primary goal or intent to disseminate the information or apply it to persons outside the individual or group involved in the activity?Will the activity result in knowledge expressed in theories, principles, and statements of relationships that can be applied to others’ experiences?Where to Start?Slide7
Does my research involve Human Subjects?Human subject means a
living individual
about whom a researcher obtains:(1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or(2) Identifiable private informationIf it is “Research,” What’s Next? Slide8
Non-ReviewableNot researchNot involving human subjects
Exempt
ExpeditedConvened or FullResourcesDePaul website: Levels of reviewhttps://offices.depaul.edu/ors/research-protections/irb/Pages/default.aspx OHRP decision trees: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/checklists/decisioncharts.html Levels of ReviewSlide9
Projects that do not involve “research” and/or “human subjects”
Non-
generalizable survey/interview research, such as:Surveys/interviews for internal program evaluationSurveys/interviews conducted by students for a class project & that will not be used outside of the classJournalism interviewsMost Oral history projectsResearch utilizing information about deceased personsResearch using archival or currently existing data, when:
Data accessed or used by the researcher are permanently de-identified or coded
and the PI will not have the key to link the data to the person
What research is non-reviewable?Slide10
Submit information to the Office of Research Services, Research Protections at ORP@depaul.edu
Receive a letter with Non-Reviewable Determination
Why might you want this?Funding agencyJournal publicationPersonal recordsNon-Reviewable Determination ProcessSlide11
Little or no risk (benign)
Must fall within one or more of the exemption categories (6)
Cannot involve prisonersCannot involve survey or interview research with children or observation of children when the investigator takes part in the activity being observedMust be someone with institutional authority that makes the exemption determinationExemption DeterminationsSlide12
In-depth IRB reviewMay be reviewed administratively
Informed consent
DePaul requires an information sheet or processContinuing ReviewExempt from What?Slide13
Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational setting, involving normal educational practices, such as research on regular and special education instructional strategies or research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.
Research involving the use of educational tests, survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior
unless information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and any disclosure of the human subjects’ responses outside of the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’ financial standing, employability, or reputation.Exempt categoriesSlide14
3. Research as per category 2 that is not exempt under category 2, if the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office…
Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if the sources are publicly available
or if the information is recorded by the investigator so that the subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.Research and demonstration projects, which are designed to study, evaluate, or examine public benefit or service programs…Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies…Exempt Categories (cont.)Slide15
Initial Review
Does not mean fast review
Minimal risk-i.e. probability and magnitude…not greater than daily life …or routine examinationsReviewed by one or more IRB membersSpecific categories (7 initial, 2 for continuing review)Is assigned an approval period Most often 364 daysCan be any time period assigned by the IRB
Continuing review, amendments, Final reports, Unanticipated problems/adverse events
Expedited ReviewSlide16
5) Research involving data, documents, records, or specimens that have been collected, or will be collected
(6) Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings for research purposes
(7) Research on individuals or groups or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies. Most Common Expedited Categories at DePaulSlide17
Greater than minimal risk or Minimal risk research that doesn’t fit into one or more of the expedited categories
Protocol receives a review by the convened Board, rather than a subcommittee review
Is assigned an approval period No categoriesConvened or Full ReviewSlide18
Summary of DePaul ProcessSlide19
Materials Required for Exempt Projects
Materials Required for
Expedited or Full ProjectsExempt applicationExpedited/full applicationExempt info sheet or processConsent, parent/guardian permission, assent forms, as appropriateMeasures or data collection toolsMeasures or data collection toolsRecruitment materials (e.g. scripts, flyers)Recruitment materials (e.g. scripts, flyers)Collaborative IRB approval*
Collaborative IRB approval*
Letters of collaboration or support*
Letters of collaboration or support*
Grant application, if federally funded
Grant application, if federally funded
CITI training completion for PI and Faculty Sponsor
CITI training completion for PI and Faculty Sponsor
Guidelines for SubmissionSlide20
Before beginning the IRB process-PLAN YOUR RESEARCH PROTOCOL!Proof read your materials for typos, incoherent or confusing language, and inconsistencies
Avoid scientific jargon, write as if explaining to someone not in your field of study
Ensure the application matches the consent documents regarding risks, benefits, and limits of confidentialityMake sure the info sheets or consent documents are written at a 6th-8th grade reading level, or at a level appropriate for the target populationMore information is better than too littleCommon General ProblemsSlide21
RecruitmentSnowball recruitmentPrivacy issues
How contact information is obtained
Engagement of othersHow it is used, in final formatOnline surveysWhen and how is the information sheet or consent presented to subjects?Active consent or agreement process?Can they skip questions?Will payment be offered? If so how is contact information gathered?Anonymous or confidential?Common IRB ConcernsSlide22
Data collectionHow is data recorded?De-identified, coded, with identifiers.
What procedures or method of data collection will be used?
Surveys (anonymous or confidential), questionnaires, interviews, record reviews, collection of artifacts.Measures to protect confidentiality of data once collectedWhat happens to data when research is completed?Audio or video recordingHow will these be used in the research?Will they be used outside of the research?Archived, documentary, teaching/training Is appropriate language included in the consent or information sheet?When are these destroyed?State law (see guidance document)Common IRB ConcernsSlide23
Consent processIs a process, it is not about signing a form.
Involves providing information in an understandable way, assessment of understanding through discussion with the subject, and ongoing assessment and affirmation.
Begins with initial contact with the participant (recruitment). It is ongoing, particularly for longitudinal research.Can be written, verbal, or elements or entire process can be altered or waived.General Principles of ConsentSlide24
Missing elements or informationInaccurate or incomplete informationReading level and vocabularyAge appropriate assent
Does the subject have the capacity to provide consent?
Not obtaining signaturesNot obtaining appropriate Legal Guardian permissionUsing the currently approved documentCommon Consent ConcernsSlide25
Susan Loess-Perez, MS, CIP, CCRC
Director of Research Compliance
Phone: 312-362-7593Email: sloesspe@depaul.eduDiana Alfaro, MSAssistant Director of Research CompliancePhone: 312-362-7592Email: dalfaro@depaul.eduJessica Bloom, MPHResearch Protections CoordinatorPhone: 312- 362-6168Email: jbloom8@depaul.edu
Richard Mulnix, II, MS
Research Protections Coordinator
Phone: 312-362-7497
Email:
rmulnix@depaul.edu
Office of Research Services
DePaul University
1 East Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
Office Location: 14 E. Jackson, Suite 1030
Fax: 312-362-7574
General Research Protections Email box:
ORP@depaul.edu
IRB Webpage:
https://
offices.depaul.edu/ors/research-protections/irb/Pages/default.aspx
Contact InformationSlide26
Questions?Q and A