Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration Ayla Stein Metadata Librarian University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign Santi Thompson Head of Digital Repository Services University of Houston Libraries ID: 472491
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Evolving Repository Landscape:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Evolving Repository Landscape: Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration
Ayla Stein
Metadata Librarian
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Santi Thompson
Head of Digital Repository Services
University of Houston LibrariesSlide2
Presentation Overview
Background
Literature Review
MethodologyResults DiscussionLimitations & Next Steps Conclusion
Goydenko
Liudmila
/
gettyimagesSlide3
Why do this study?Slide4
Research Questions
What motivations prompt institutions to migrate from one DAMS to another?
In what directions are institutions moving? For example, are institutions moving from proprietary systems to open source systems?Slide5
Literature Review
Selecting
Initial DAMS
Policy & PlanningEvaluation CriteriaNeeds AssessmentsCase studies on DAMS
Migration
Dissatisfactions
Wants & NeedsSlide6
Methodology
Eligibility
Evaluation topics
Topic selectionSurvey designSlide7
Eligibility
Respondents have completed the migration process from the “Old DAMS" to the "New DAMS“
Respondents are currently migrating from the “Old DAMS” to the “New DAMS“
Respondents have selected a “New DAMS” but have not started the migration processSlide8
Evaluation Topics
Implementation & Day-to-Day Costs
User Administration
Organizational ViabilityTechnical SupportSystem AdministrationExtensibility
Information Retrieval & Access
Content Management
Preservation
User Interface Customization
Interoperability
Reputation
Metadata StandardsSlide9
Survey Design
Question Formats
Demographic information
System MovementSelection & Ranking of MotivationsSlide10
Results Overview
Survey Demographics
Top 5
TopicsPriority RankingsHighlights from Top 5 Topics - VisualizedSlide11Slide12Slide13Slide14Slide15
Priority Rank
Rank 1: Implementation, Preservation, Extensibility
Rank 2: User Customization, Content Management, Technical Support
Rank 3: Content Management, ExtensibilityRank 4: Content Management, Preservation, Information Retrieval, System Administration
Rank 5: Metadata Standards, Technical Support, User Interface, InteroperabilitySlide16
Content Management ResultsSlide17
Metadata ResultsSlide18
Extensibility ResultsSlide19
Preservation ResultsSlide20
UI Customization ResultsSlide21
Technical Support ResultsSlide22
Discussion
What needs and/or factors prompt institutions to migrate?
What “direction” are institutions migrating?
Overall themeSlide23
Self Control
Content Management: Scalability
Metadata: Multiple Schema & Flexibility
Extensibility: Local Development UI Customization: Local Design DecisionsSlide24
Third Party Support
Technical Support: a role for governing organizations, vendors, and communitiesSlide25
Inconclusive
Digital Preservation: Contradictory Results Slide26
System MovementSlide27
Limitations &
Next Steps
Limitations
Future ResearchInstitutional/ Data RepositoriesSlide28Slide29
Works Cited
California Digital Library, “Glossary” (2014) Retrieved March 30, 2015 from
http://www.cdlib.org/gateways/technology/glossary.html
Slide30
Images Cited1
. By Kathryn Greenhill [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia
Commons
2. All other images used courtesy of gettyimages http://www.gettyimages.com/licenseinfo 3. Charts created by Ayla Stein and Santi Thompson