/
Benjamin  Ades -Aron , Stephanie Yeager, Benjamin  Ades -Aron , Stephanie Yeager,

Benjamin Ades -Aron , Stephanie Yeager, - PowerPoint Presentation

phoenixbristle
phoenixbristle . @phoenixbristle
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-26

Benjamin Ades -Aron , Stephanie Yeager, - PPT Presentation

Els Fieremans Nand Miskin Ajax George James Golomb Center for biomedical imaging New York University School of Medicine New York NY Control 1144 Poster eP104 Diffusion Kurtosis of the Cortical Spinal Tract Characterizes ID: 803177

1144 benjamin gmail adesaron benjamin 1144 adesaron gmail nph kurtosis diffusion axial axonal tract control differences awf controls disease

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Benjamin Ades -Aron , Stephanie Yeager," is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Benjamin

Ades-Aron, Stephanie Yeager, Els Fieremans, Nand Miskin, Ajax George, James GolombCenter for biomedical imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Control #: 1144

Poster #: eP-104

Diffusion Kurtosis of the Cortical Spinal Tract Characterizes

Adult Normal Pressure

Hydrocepalus

Slide2

Speaker Name: Benjamin

Ades

-Aron

I have no financial interests or relationships to disclose with regard to the subject matter of this presentation.

Declaration of

Financial Interests or Relationships

Slide3

Purpose

To investigate changes in cortical-spinal tract (CST) integrity in patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) using tractogaphy and diffusion MRILocalize exactly where NPH effects the CSTTo determine whether this method can be used as a diagnostic tool to differentiate patients with NPH from control groupsTo study whether permanent cell damage can be assessed in NPH using diffusion model biomarkers

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide4

Diffusion Kurtosis ImagingDKI is sensitive to myelination, axonal integrity, and

intravoxel fiber orientationAxial Diffusivity (AD) axonal integrity Axial kurtosis (AK) fiber coherence / presence of microstructureAxonal Water Fraction (AWF) demyelination and axonal atrophy

Demyelination/axonal loss

Detected by AD and AWF

Fiber alignment Detected by AK

Images from:Fieremans E, Novikov DS et al., ISMRM 2012 #465 and Atsushi Nakanishi et al. Neuroradiology 2013

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide5

Seed ROIs in the cerebral peduncle and precentral gyrusDiffusion and Kurtosis parameters were resampled onto streamlines as scalars

Streamlines were truncated and normalized for group comparisons

FA image

seed ROIs

Streamlines

Weighted tracts

Tractography

Mrtrix

package (J-D

Tournier

, Brain Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia)

AK image

AD

image

AWF

image

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide6

Materials and Methods

Number of subjects

Age

Gender m/f

NPH

14

58 – 87, mean 75

7/7

Alzheimer's

10

60 – 85, mean 75

5/5

Control

11

60 – 87, mean 75

6/5

Data

Acquisition

3T

MRI acquired with b = 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2 in 60

directions

Diffusion Processing

Standard

Diffusion and Kurtosis measures (mean, axial, and radial) were computed after smoothing and motion + eddy correction in FSL

WMTI metrics were computed in addition to standard model parameters

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide7

Alzheimer’s

healthy controlNPH

Demonstration of Group Differences

Alzheimer’s

Healthy control

NPHAxial DiffusionAxial Kurtosis

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide8

Along-Tract Axial Diffusivity

*

*

Significant differences between NPH and control groups occur between

60% and 85%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide9

Along-Tract Axial Kurtosis

*

*

Significant between 50% and 90%

*

*

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide10

Along-Tract Axonal Water Fraction

*

*

Significant between

70% and 85%

*

*

*

*

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide11

ROC analysis AUC values

NPH vs Alzheimer’sNPH vs Healthy Controls Alzheimer’s vs Healthy ControlsFA

0.64

0.52

0.76

MD0.910.980.79RD0.880.98

0.84

AD

0.92

1.0

0.51

MK

0.61

0.83

0.82

RK

0.68

0.58

0.82

AK

0.92

0.99

0.67

AWF

0.65

0.93

0.86

AUC is a measure of diagnostic accuracy

75% of the distance along the tract (corona radiata)#1144 benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide12

ResultsAxial Diffusivity was found to be greater in NPH than Alzheimer’s and control groups in the periventricular CSTAxial Kurtosis and Axonal Water Fraction were lower than control groupsMain statistical differences were found in the superior corona

radiata and posterior internal capsuleAD and AK have high diagnostic accuracy

#1144 benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide13

Blue

:

P

(controls

)

Red: P(NPH)

Tracts do not pass through areas

of maximum white matter disease

Leukoareosis

Probability Maps

Probability of

luko

Residuals

Region where only NPH is affected

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide14

Regression

for AD and controls

only

No correlation between volume of

lukoarosis

and axial Kurtosis in NPH at high axial kurtosis values

While

diffusion metrics

correlate

with the presence of white matter legions

, these

legions

do not

explain the

the

differences in diffusion between groups

Are we detecting

leukoareosis

rather than NPH?

#1144

benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide15

Conclusions

Pathology in NPH is located in the upper periventricular part of the CST. The superior corona radiata and some posterior internal capsule

Differences in Axial Kurtosis imply that the CST in NPH is more tightly aligned than that of AD and controls

Increased axial diffusivity and axonal water fraction imply neuronal loss in the CST in NPH patients compared to AD and controls

Axonal loss reflected by increased AD and decreased AWF may reflect irreversible

damage done to the CST due to mechanical stress placed on white matter tissue by the expanding ventriclesLeukoareosis cannot account for the changes we have seen#1144 benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide16

Thank you

Ajax George, M.D.James Golomb, M.D.#1144 benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com

Slide17

ReferencesHattori, T., et al. "Altered microstructure in corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease with dementia." American Journal of Neuroradiology 32.9 (2011): 1681-1687. Hong, Y. J., et al. "Differences in microstructural alterations of the hippocampus in Alzheimer disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a diffusion tensor imaging study." American Journal of Neuroradiology 31.10 (2010): 1867-1872.

Fieremans, E., et al. "Novel white matter tract integrity metrics sensitive to Alzheimer disease progression." American Journal of Neuroradiology 34.11 (2013): 2105-2112 #1144 benjamin.adesaron@gmail.com