Weber State University and Utah State University Understanding Outcomes of a MultiYear MultiCounty Marriage Celebration Event Since the 1950s the desire for relationship education has been increasing in the United States resulting in the increased creation and proliferation of relationship e ID: 783347
Download The PPT/PDF document "Drs. Pamela B. Payne & Naomi Brower" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Drs. Pamela B. Payne & Naomi BrowerWeber State University and Utah State University
Understanding Outcomes of a Multi-Year, Multi-County Marriage Celebration Event
Slide2Since the 1950’s the desire for relationship education has been increasing in the United States resulting in the increased creation and proliferation of relationship education programs (Cowan, Cowan and Knox, 2010; Cowan and Cowan, 2014).
Several meta-analyses (Cowan & Cowan, 2014;
Halford & Bodenmann, 2013) show that generally these programs may have small but statistically significant impact on marital quality as often indicated through self-reports. Marriage relationship education has a greater affect in the short-term for those that are in immediate distress, and greater long-term effects for those that are in a preventative position (Blanchard, Hawkins, Baldwin, & Fawcett, 2009).
Introduction
Slide3The Weber County Marriage Coalition hosts an annual event in conjunction with Utah State University Cooperative Extension
as a “date night” enrichment event
.The event had a yearly theme such as “Creating the Best Ever Marriage,” “Shake it Up,” or “Love Talks.” Speaker topics were selected through a needs assessment from the marriage coalition and from participant feedback from previous events. Workshops were presented by professionals from the local area and included topics such as intimacy, communication, and staying connected. An
entertaining keynote speaker
provided a fun but educational end to the evening.
About the Northern Utah Marriage Celebration
Slide4The primary goal of this project is to determine if the Northern Utah Marriage Celebration event influences participant knowledge.
Research question 1: Does participant knowledge increase from prior to the event to two weeks post event?
Does this differ by year of participation?Research question 2: Are there any differences based on participant age in the knowledge obtained and retained from the marriage celebration?Research Question 3: Are there any difference based on participant sex in the knowledge obtained and retained from the marriage celebration? Goals and Research Questions
Slide5The evaluation tool included presenter feedback, a posttest-then-retrospective-pretest questionnaire, demographic information, and open-ended questions (Marshall, Higginbotham, Harris, & Lee, 2007
).
Asked participants to rate six levels of relationship knowledge before and after the program (e.g., “how to effectively communicate with my spouse/partner,” and “how to settle disagreements well) on a rating scale from poor (1) to perfect (5). An electronic follow-up survey was sent approximately two weeks after the conference to those that provided email addresses. Perceived relationship knowledge scale (PRKS) (Bradford, Stewart, Higginbotham, & Skogrand, 2015)which is
a 6-item measure used to assess participant understanding of various relationship skills such as communication, problem solving, and strengthening relationship
.
Cronbachs
alpha .88 and .87 in this sample for pre- and post-test respectively
Methods
Slide6Average event attendance is roughly 520 individuals per year (N = 480 in 2015; N = 554 in 2016)
Participants
Year
Participant Sex
Age
Pre-Test (N = 368)
2015
Male = 47.3 % (N = 189)
Female = 52.8% (N = 211)
M = 40 yrs (SD = 10.7) Range 4 – 70
Pre-Test (N = 500)
2016
Male = 48.4 % (N = 242)
Female = 51.6 % (N = 258)
M = 41 yrs (SD = 11.1)
Range 14 - 74
Post-Test (N = 355)
2015
Male = 47.3 % (N = 174)
Female = 52.7 % (N = 194)
M = 40 yrs (SD = 10.7)
Range 4 - 70
Post-Test (N = 474)
2016
Male = 47.5 % (N = 225)
Female = 52.5 % (N = 249)
M = 41
yrs
(SD = 11.2)
Range 14 - 74
Slide7Results
Results indicated a significant (
p < .001) and positively correlated (r = .456) increase in participants from the pretest to the posttest across both years of participation. This suggests that the Marriage Celebration is meeting its goal of increasing participant knowledge in their relationships. Results indicate that participants in 2015 and 2016 did not differ at Time 1 but did differ significantly at Time 2.
Scale
Time 1: F Value
Time 1 Group Differences
Time 2: F Value
Time 2 Group Differences
Direction of Difference (Figure 1)
Perceived Knowledge
3.6t
ns
5.4*
2015 & 2016
p < .05
2015 < 2016
Slide8Research Question 2 results indicate that there were difference in participants knowledge transformation based on age at the post-test assessment but not during the pre-workshop assessment.
There was
a significant difference between various age groups at the time of the post-test, but not at the pre-test assessment. Results indicate that younger participants were gaining more perceived knowledge than older participants were on the self-reported perception of relationship skills measureResearch Question 3 results indicated that there were no significant differences in knowledge obtained and retained by participant sex.
Results
Slide9Results
Slide10This suggests that Community Relationship Education is effective. The Marriage Celebration does help individuals improve their relationships.This supports the continuation of CRE events such as this one.
Age matters… Participants at the older end of the spectrum may be less concerned with perceptions of knowledge making them more open to learning to improve their relationships. Participants at the younger end of the spectrum may be more eager to learn as their relationships may be newer.
Participant sex doesn’t matter in obtaining and retaining knowledge.Discussions
Slide11We should continue to offer Community Relationship Education aimed at prevention and enhancement for couples. Longitudinal work would be beneficial to determine if these improvements are enduring over time or if the benefit is only short term.
Does dosage matter?
We will be examining the difference between this event and other similar events that have differing lengths. What does the qualitative data say? We will be exploring this next for 2015-2017. Implications and Future Directions
Slide12Contact: Pamela B. Payne pamelapayne@weber.edu
Thank you! Questions?