CERN R Gehring KIT Th Parker ESS J Stadlmann P Spiller GSI EuCARD² is cofunded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme Grant Agreement 312453 ID: 778147
Download The PPT/PDF document "M. Seidel (PSI ), E. Jensen" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
M. Seidel (PSI), E. Jensen (CERN), R. Gehring (KIT),Th. Parker (ESS), J. Stadlmann, P. Spiller (GSI)EuCARD² is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement 312453
The
Accelerator Energy Efficiency program of EuCARD
2
Slide2Accelerator Efficiency – OutlinePolitical picture of energy efficiencyDesire: sustainable energy: but insufficient storage; numerical examples of amounts of energyConsequences for accelerator facilitiesW
ork package EnEfficient within the EuCARD
2 programPower flow in an acceleratorM
ajor consumers in typical accelerator facilities
C
onversion to secondary radiation: highest potentialExamples of technical developments towards higher efficiencyHeat recoveryEfficient magnetsEfficient RF generation, s.c. cavitiesEnergy management
abstract
concrete
Slide3The Energy problemClimate change and worldwide scarcity of resources cause critical reflections on the use of fossil energy carriers; nuclear power has other problems and is disputed …Energy cost will rise over medium timescales (at least not decrease) Improving efficiency is a strategy in many countries, this also affects accelerator projects
new accelerator projects and existing facilities must consider efficiency and sustainability
Slide4Energy:
Order of Magnitude Examples
generation
consumption
storage1d cyclist „Tour de France“(4h x 300W): 1.2 kWh1 run of cloth washing machine:0.8…1 kWhCar battery (60 Ah
):0.72 kWh
1d Wind Power Station (avg):12 MWh
1d
SwissLightSource
2.4 GeV,0.4 A
:
82 MWh
ITER superconducting coil:
12.5 MWh
1d
nucl. Pow. Plant Leibstadt (CH):30 GWh1d CLIC Linear Collider @3TeV:14 GWhall German storage hydropower:40 GWh
CLIC, 580 MW
SLS, 3.5 MW
ITER
hydro storage
car battery
nucl
. plant 1.3 GW
cyclist, 300 W
wind-power, 3 MW peak
Slide5Energy: Order of Magnitude Examplesgenerationconsumptionstorage1d cyclist „Tour de France
“(4h x 300W):
1.2 kWh1 run of cloth washing machine:0.8…1 kWhCar battery (
60 Ah
):
0.72 kWh1d Wind Power Station (avg):12 MWh1d SwissLightSource 2.4 GeV,0.4 A: 82 MWhITER superconducting coil:12.5 MWh
1d nucl. Pow. Plant Leibstadt (CH):
30 GWh1d CLIC Linear Collider @3TeV:
14
GWh
all German storage
hydropower
:
40
GWh
1d Earth/Moon System E-loss:
77
TWh1d electrical consumpt. mankind:53 TWhWorld storage hydropower:O(1 TWh )1d sunshine absorbed on Earth:
3,000,000 TWh1d total mankind (inc.fuels):
360 TWh
1.) Accelerators are in the range where they are relevant for society and public discussion
2.) Desired turn to renewables is an enormous task; storage is the problem, not production3.) Fluctuations of energy availability, depending on time and weather, will be large!
Slide6Task 1: Energy recovery from cooling circuits, Th. Parker, A. Lundmark (ESS)Task 2: Higher electronic efficiency RF power generation, E. Jensen (CERN)Task 3: Short term energy storage systems, R. Gehring (KIT)Task 4: Virtual power plant, J. Stadlmann (GSI)
Task 5: Beam transfer channels with low power consumption, P. Spiller (GSI)
Networking Activity “EnEfficient”, EuCARD
2
links to all workshops on www.psi.ch/enefficientEuCARD: „European Coordination for Accelerator Research”, co-funded by European Commission, 2013…2017EnEfficient: WP3, networking activity to stimulate developments, support accelerator projects, thesis studies etc.
Work Package Leader: M. Seidel (PSI)
Slide7Power flow in Accelerators Electrical GridAcceleratorRadio Frequency
MagnetsVacuum etc.
A
uxiliary
systemscryogenicsconv. cooling, AC etc.Instrumentse.g. particle detectors
conversion to secondary radiation (beam collisions, targets,
undulators …)
direct beam application
:
p-therapy
isotope production
secondary radiation
exotic particles, e.g. Higgs, B-mesons
synchrotron radiation
neutrons
muons
figure of
merit:
secondary
particles, X-rays on
sample per KWh
beam
finally all converted to waste heat !
Slide8Ring Cyclotron 590 MeV
loss
10
-4
Power transfer through
4 amplifier chains 4 resonators 50 MHz
SINQ
spallation source
Example:
PSI Facility, 10 MW
2.2 mA /1.3 MW
Proton therapy centre [250 MeV sc. cyclotron]
dimensions:
120 x 220 m
2
Muon production targets
50 MHz resonator
Slide9Electricval grid ca. 10 MWRF Systems 4.1 MWMagnets
2.6 MW
aux.SystemsInstruments 3.3 MW
Beam on targets
1.3 MW
heat to river, to air
neutrons
muons
cryogenics
Example:
PSI Facility, 10 MW
n: per beamline:
10
13
s
-1
@ 10eV ≈ 20µW
+
: per beamline
5·10
8
s
-1
@ 30MeV/c
≈ 300µW
Slide10Conversion efficiency grid to secondary radiation
Conversion to secondary radiation/particles is often required
has great potential for the overall efficiency, for example:
Synchrotron Radiation
emittance!; optimized
undulators
; FEL: coherent radiation; energy recovery
Colliders
low-beta insertion; crab cavities etc.
Neutron Sources
target; moderators, neutron guides etc.
Muon Sources
target; capture optics; µ-cooling
PSI-HIPA: muons
PSI-HIPA: neutrons
SLS: SR
SwissFEL
: SR
linear collider, high energy:
Slide11Example: improved conversion efficiency Spallation Target [M. Wohlmuther, PSI]
Measure
gainZr cladding instead steel
12%
more compact rod bundle
5%Pb reflector10%inverted entrance window10%total gain factor
1.42
colour code: neutron density on same scale
(MCNPX)
old
new
beam
beam
Slide12Accelerator Efficiency – OutlinePolitical picture of energy efficiencyDesire: sustainable energy: but insufficient storage; numerical examples of amounts of energyConsequences for accelerator facilities
Work package EnEfficient within the Eucard-2 program
Power flow in an acceleratorMajor consumers in typical accelerator facilitiesConversion to secondary radiation: highest potential
Examples of technical developments towards higher efficiency
Heat recovery
Efficient magnetsEfficient RF generation, s.c. cavitiesEnergy management
Slide13Participants (Experts) from DESY, ALBA, SOLEIL, ESS, MAX-4, PSI, DAFNE, ISIS (institutes)e-ON, Kraftringen, Lund municipality (industry, local authorities)
Lab survey on consumption and heat recoveryHeat recovery works for many facilities; high temperatures beneficial; local heat distribution system required
Greenhouses/food production present interesting application (non-linear scaling)New facilities MAX-4 and ESS foresee heat recovery on large scale
talks: http://indico.esss.lu.se/indico/event/148/
Heat Recovery Workshop, Lund, March 2014
[Th. Parker, E .Lindström, ESS]
Slide14Lab Survey: Energy Consumption & Heat[Master Thesis, J. Torberntsson, ESS]
10 in operation
2 under Construction
Energy consumption
Cooling methods
Energy related costs
Slide15Use of Waste Heatproduce work electrical power?example:
: efficiency 8%
: efficiency 20%
convert heat to higher T level for heating purposes
example:
,
,
:
,
,
(available for heating)
use heat directly at available temperature
example:
: heating
: green houses, food production
1 [electrical power]
0.95 [mechanical power]
0.3…0.4 [heat]
Q
uality of power
Slide16An increase in temperature from
to
doubled the growth rate in salmon
smolt
.
Weight (average) in grams
Days
A
.
Kiessling
However: strong scaling with
T
for food production, i.e. fish!
Slide17Efficient RF Generation and Beam AccelerationThe more energy is converted – the less you have reject into environment!RF generation efficiency is key for many accelerator applications, especially high intensity machinesTopics at Cockcroft workshop:klystron developmentmulti beam IOT (ESS)magnetronshigh Q s.c. cavities
Workshop EnEfficient RF sources:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/297025/
E2V: magnetron
THALES: multi-beam klystron
CPI: multi-beam IOT
THALES: TETRODE
SIEMENS: solid state amplifier
Slide18Inductive Output Tubes – considered for ESS[M. Jensen (ESS) @ EnEfficient RF sources, 2014]
P
in
P
out
Klystron/MBK
IOT
MB-IOT
back-off for feedback
Operating
Power Level
+6 dB
sat
65-68%
ESS ~ 45%
High gain
Low Gain
Long-pulse
excursions possible
Short-pulse
excursions possible
IOT
’
s don
’
t saturate.
Built-in headroom for feedback.
70%
Courtesy of CPI
Klystrons: Back-off for feedback, cost: 30%
IOTs: Operate close to max efficiency
Slide19Klystrons: Methods to get high efficiency ()[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7194781]
‘’Classical” bunchingNew bunching with core oscillations (COM)
RF
=78.0%Useful RF phase
Normalised velocity
Normalised velocity
RF period, rad
RF
=89.6%
Normalised velocity
RF period, rad
Electrons velocities distributions prior entering the output cavity
Bunch phase
Bunch phase
0
0
2
2
Output cavity
Output cavity
Slide20Superconducting cavities for CW operationRelated references:A. Grasselino et al., “Nitrogen and argon doping of niobium for superconducting radio frequency cavities: a pathway to highly efficient accelerating structures”, Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 26 No. 102001S. Posen and A. Liepe, “RF Test results of the first NB2SN Cavities coated at Cornell”, Proceedings of SRF2013, Paris France
Voltage
, dissipated power and cryogenic efficiency:
New developments:
N
2 doping, high Q, low PdissipPossibly Nb3Sn cavities, high Q at 4.2K, thus better
promising example: FNAL results
Low power accelerator magnetsWorkshop on Special Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design, November 2014, CERN; indico.cern.ch/event/321880/in prep: Ph. Gardlowski, master thesis, systematic comparison of beam transport
TypePro
Con
Permanent magnets
No power required, reliable, compact
Tunability difficult, large aperture magnets limited, radiation damageOptimized electro-magnetLow power, less cooling (+vibrations)
Larger size, cost
Pulsed magnet
Low average power, less cooling, high fields
Complexity of magnet and circuit, field errors
Superconducting magnet
No
ohmic
losses, higher fields
Cost
, complexity,
cryo
installationHigh saturation materials
Lower power, compactnessand weight
Cost, gain is limited
Slide22NdFeB magnets with Br = 1.37 T 4 permanent magnet blocksgradient = 15.0…60.4 T/m, stroke = 0..64 mmPole gap = 27.2 mm
Field quality = ±0.1% over 23 mm
Permanent Magnet Quad Design for CLIC
[B. Shepard, STFC Daresbury]
Stroke =
0 … 64 mm
Tunable
high-gradient permanent magnet quadrupoles, B.J.A. Shepherd
et al
2014
JINST
9 T11006
Slide23Pulsed Quadrupole Magnet
[P. Spiller et al, GSI]
Prototype Quadrupole
Gradient
80 T/m
Length
0.65 m
Pulse length
90
m
s (beam 1
m
s)
Peak current
400 kA (35 kA)
Peak voltage
17 kV (5 kV)
Energy @17 kV
65 kJ (5.6 kJ)
Inductivity
535 nH
Capacitor
450
m
F
Forces
200 kN
Engineering model of the prototype quadrupole magnet incl. support
See U. Bell et al:
IPAC15: WEPMA021
low average power; energy recovery in capacitive storage possible for periodic operation; high field
complexity added by pulsing circuit; field precision potentially challenging
Slide24E management: impact of solar/wind energy(taken from internet)Renewables cause strong variationsImpact on accelerators?
Energy management, but how?
Germany
Slide25Energy management example: CLIC Study on standby modes
Andrea Latina, CERN
CLIC project predicts large power for 3TeV case: 580 MW
idea:
Prepare standby modes for high consumption times during day; relatively fast luminosity recovery from standby (challenging)
Model calculation includes standby power, start-up timesresult of model with 2 standbys during day:
Slide26Energy Storage for AcceleratorsLIQuid HYdrogen & SMES
storage systems needed for:
pulsed RF systems
cycling synchrotrons
pulsed magnets
uninterrupted powerstrategic energy managementdevelopment by KIT for general purpose:hybrid SMES/LH2[M. Sander, R. Gehring, KIT]
large power 10...100 MWcapacity to
70 GWhSMES to 10 GJ
synergy with existing cryogenics
Slide27SummaryWith scarcity of resources and in presence of global climate change, Energy Efficiency becomes important for accelerator projects; Eucard-2 offers a networking activity dedicated to this topic.Physics concept to generate radiation for users has large potential for efficiency (SR, exotic particles, µ, n etc.); advancements should be better communicated as efficiency improvementsMany technical efforts are undertaken with heat recovery, RF systems, cavities, magnets, energy management
3rd Workshop
on Sustainable Energy for large Accelerator RI‘s took place last week at DESY: http://erf.desy.de/energyworkshopPlanned
:
proton
driver efficiency (Feb 16), http://indico.psi.ch/event/Proton.Driver.Efficiency.WorkshopEnergy management (2016)EuCARD2/EnEfficient – stay tuned: www.psi.ch/enefficient
Thank you for your attention!