/
Constraining progenitors of Constraining progenitors of

Constraining progenitors of - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
391 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-29

Constraining progenitors of - PPT Presentation

SNRs using Xray morphology and spectra Hiroya Yamaguchi HarvardSmithsonian Center for Astrophysics Classification of SN Progenitors Optical obs of SNe Classification is relatively straightforward ID: 382232

ionization snrs ejecta type snrs ionization type ejecta snr ionized kev density emission w49b ray spectrum net sn1006 kte ion ism nei

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Constraining progenitors of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Constraining progenitors of SNRs using X-ray morphology and spectra

Hiroya Yamaguchi

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for AstrophysicsSlide2

Classification of SN Progenitors

Optical

obs

of

SNe

Classification is relatively

straightforward- Spectrum (historically well established) - Luminosity (56Ni yield)

X-ray obs of SNRs

Classification (Ia/CC) is (was) controversial in many SNRs- Similar X-ray luminosity- Morphology? SNRs can be spatially resolved, strong advantage of X-ray- Spectrum?

SNe

Ia

: nuclear reaction energy ~ 1051 erg

SNe CC: gravitational energy ~ 1053 erg 99% neutrino + 1% kinetic (~ 1051 erg)

Ia (SD)

Ia (DD)

CC (1987A)

=> transformed to thermal energy (X-ray luminosity)Slide3

Type Ia

CC

Ellipticity

Mirror

asymmetricity

Morphology of

SNRs

CC

SNRs are more asymmetric than Ia SNRs (Lopez+09;11)

G344.7

-

0.1 found

to be Type Ia (HY+12)Chandra images of Galactic/Magellanic

SNRsReflects nature of explosion and/or environment?

SNR E0102-72 (CC)

0104-72.3 (Ia candidate)

Doesn’t work for SMC SNRs

… (Lopez+12)

0104-72.3

E

0102-72Slide4

X-Ray Spectra of SNRs

Advantage

- Optically thin (self absorption is almost

negligible, but see Miyata+08)

- K-shell emission from He- & H-like atoms

(kT

e ~ hn ~ 0.1–10 keV, comparable to K-shell potential), so physics is simple

Si

S

Ar

Ca

Fe

Ni

Mg

Ne

Artificial

features

(a sort of

bgd

)

Simple Quiz

CC (W49B)

Ia

(SN1006)

YOU LOSE

m9(^Д^)

Suzaku

spectrum

of

Tycho

(Hayato+10)Slide5

X-Ray Spectra of SNRs

Si

S

Ar

Ca

Fe

Ni

Mg

Ne

Artificial

features

(a sort of

bgd)

W49B (CC)

Large foreground

extinction makes

O/Ne/Mg emission in W49B

weak

Absorption for

different column

density (N

H

[cm

-2

])

SN1006

W49B

Note: although we use N

H

to describe

the column, what we measure in

X-rays is the column of

metals

Yet, weakness of Fe emission in

SN 1006 (

Ia

SNR) is puzzling

=> Understanding of NEI

is essentialSlide6

Non Equilibrium in Ionization (NEI)

Pre-shocked metals in ISM/

ejecta

are

almost neutral (unionized)

Shock-

heated electrons gradually ionize atoms by collision, but ionization proceeds very slowly compared to heating

Fe ion population

in NEI plasma for

kTe = 5 keV

ne

t (cm-3 s)Ion fraction

Fe24+

Fe25+

Fe

26+

Fe

16+

lowly

ionized

high

ly

ionized

Fe

24+

Fe

25+

Fe

26+

Fe

16+

Electron temperature

kT

e

(

keV

)

CIE

n

e

t

: “ionization age”

n

e

:

electron density

t

: elapsed time since gas

was heatedSlide7

Non Equilibrium in Ionization (NEI)

Fe ion

population

in

NEI

plasma for kTe

= 5 keVne

t (cm-3 s)

Ion fractionFe24+Fe25+

Fe

26+

Fe

16+

lowly ionizedhighly ionized

net : “ionization age”

ne : electron density

t : elapsed time since gas was heated

Timescale to reach CIE for ISM

t

~ 3

x

10

4

(n

e

/1 cm

-3

)

-1

yr

As for

e

jecta

Time when the masses of swept-up

ISM

and

ejecta

becomes comparable

Ionization state for the

ejecta

becomes almost

“frozen”

after an SNR evolved.

Ionization age for the

ejecta

strongly depends

on the

initial CSM density

rather than its age.Slide8

Non Equilibrium in Ionization (NEI)

Full X-ray band

Magnified spectra in the

6-7

keV

band

(Fe

K

emission)

Fe-L blend

Fe-K

Observed

spectrum (Convolved by

Suzaku

response)

n

e

t = 5x10

9

1x10

10

5x10

10

1x10

11

3x10

11

Ar

-like

Ne-like

C-like

Be-like

He-like

Model spectra of Fe emission [

kT

e

= 5

keV

]

How does ionization age affect a spectrum?

How can we measure ionization age?

H-

like

6.42

keV

6.44

keV

6.60

keV

6.64

keV

6.67

keV

6.0

7

.0

0.5

10Slide9

Si

S

Ar

Ca

Fe

Ni

Mg

Ne

Artificial

features

(a sort of

bgd

)

Ozawa+2009

HY+2008,

Uchida+, in prep.

SN1006 (Type

Ia

SNR) W49B (CC SNR)Slide10

SN1006: Searching for Fe emission

Fe?

BeppoSAX

MECS

spectrum

Chandra image

Prototypical Type

Ia SNR, but emission from Fe has never been detected.

- Only one possible detection reported by BeppoSAX

- XMM-Newton failed to detect

Vink+00

Suzaku

spectrum(HY+08)

Detected! but weak despite of its Type

Ia originFe-K

centroid ~ 6420eV (< Ne-like) … Corresponding net is ~ 1

x

10

9

cm

-3

s

Fe

24+

Fe

25+

Fe

26+

Fe

16+Slide11

SN1006: Multiple net Components in Si

Approx with 2-

n

e

t

components

for Si and S ejecta net1 ~ 1×1010

cm-3 s net2

~ 1×109 cm-3 s cf. Fe: net ~ 1×109 cm-3 s

Si ion fraction

@1keV

Si

12+Si

13+Si6+

Si8+

C~O-like

He-like

Mg

Si

broad feature

S

Reverse shock heats from outer region

Outer

ejecta

= highly ionized

Inner

ejecta

= lowly ionizedSlide12

SN1006: Fullband Spectrum & Abundances

ISM

(

w

/ solar

abundance)

Outer ejecta (ne

t ~ 1010 cm-3

s)Inner ejecta (net ~ 109)Non-thermal

(synchrotron)

Fe

Derived abundance ratios compared

to the W7 model of Nomoto+84

Outer

ejecta

Inner ejecta

Suggests stratified composition with Fe toward the

SNR center,

which results in the lowly-ionized (thus weak) Fe emission

HY+08Slide13

Ejecta Stratification in Type Ia SN/SNRs

XMM image of

Tycho

Radius (

arcmin

)

Radial

profile

FeSi

Color: Si-K

Contour: Fe-K

Decourchelle+01

Mazzali+07

IME

56

Ni

Enclosed mass

SN 2003du

(

Tanaka+10)

See also

Badenes+06Slide14

Si

S

Ar

Ca

Fe

Ni

Mg

Ne

Artificial

features

(a sort of

bgd

)

Ozawa+2009

HY+2008,

Uchida+, in prep.

SN1006 (Type

Ia

SNR) W49B (CC SNR)Slide15

W49B: Peculiar Ionization State

- RRC can be enhanced only when

the plasma is

recombining

(e.g., photo-ionized plasma)

Similar recombining SNRs - IC443 (HY+09) - SNR 0506-68 (Broersen+11) - other 3 & a few candidates“Recombining NEI” in

SNRs is not unique => Need to define “recombination age”

CrMnHe-like Fe Ka

Ni + Fe K

b

Fe-K RRC

H-like Fe

Ozawa+09Ejecta is highly ionized to be He-likeRadiative recombination continuum

Fe25+ + e- → Fe24+ + h

n … indicates presence of a large fraction

of H-like Fe

Measured

kT

e

~

1.5

keV

Temperature (

keV

)

Fe

24+

Fe

25+

Fe

26+

Fe

16+

Fe ion population in a

CIE

plasmaSlide16

W49B: Possible Progenitor

blast wave

2nd reverse shock

reverse shock

Blast wave

b

reakout into ISM

BW speed becomes faster and expand

adiabatically, resulting in rapid cooling with “frozen” ionization state Shimizu+12Explosion in dense CSM

- Numerical (Shimizu+12)

- Analytical, more progenitor- oriented (Moriya 12)

RSG case (

vw ~ 10 km/s)

WR case (vw ~ 1000 km/s)Type II-P or IIn

could be a progenitor of a recombining SNR (Moriya 12)Slide17

Fe-K diagnostics

Extreme cases have been shown

SN1006: Type

Ia

SNR,

Fe lowly-ionized due to a low ambient density and ejecta stratification with Fe more concentrated toward the center W49B: CC SNR, Fe over-ionized (recombining),

possibly due to interaction with high-density CSM … and inhomogeneous ejecta structure?

Red: SiBlue: FeGreen: continuum

Other SNRs?Slide18

Fe-K diagnostics

Type

Ia

CC

- Type

Ia

and CC

SNRs are clearly separated (CC more ionized)- Luminosity of both groups are distributed in the similar range.

(HY+, in prep.)

n

e

t = 5x10

9

1x1010 5x1010 1x1011 3x1011

Can be explained by ionization (and temperture, density effects)

--- Measuring ionization state is essential for measuring

element abundances!!Slide19

Fe-K diagnostics

Type

Ia

CC

(HY+, in prep.)

Ionization ages expected if the

SNRs

have evolved in uniform ISM with

typical density

Hachisu+01

Badenes+07

If the SD scenario is the case, a large, low-density

cavity is expected around the progenitor No evidence of an “accretion wind” and a resultant cavity but for a few

Type Ia SNRsSlide20

Evidence of cavity/CSM in Ia SNRs

RCW86 (Williams+11)

Unique

Ia

SNR where the presence of

a surrounding cavity is suggested

Kepler

(Reynolds+07)

N103B (Lewis+03)Slide21

Summary

X-ray observation of

SNRs

is one of the best methods to study

stellar/

explosive nucleosynthesis. (optically-thin, K-shell emission)- Understanding of non-equilibrium in ionization is, however, essential for accurate measurement of element abundances.

- Fe emission in Type Ia SNRs is commonly weak due to low-density ambient and stratified chemical composition.- In CC SNRs, on the other hand, Fe is highly ionized, sometime

overionized, possibly due to initial CSM interaction.- No evidence of a large cavity expected from an “accretion wind” around Type Ia

SNRs, except for RCW86, constraining progenitor system??