/
Literature Reviews, Literature Reviews,

Literature Reviews, - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
363 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-18

Literature Reviews, - PPT Presentation

APA Style amp Annotated Bibliographies Martha Stephenson UWWhitewater Literature Review Critically analyzes a part of a published body of knowledge Provides a summary of previous research on a topic ID: 164580

amp literature research journal literature amp journal research review articles http article author retrieved library television style annotations topic work london works

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Literature Reviews," is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Literature Reviews, APA Style, & Annotated Bibliographies

Martha Stephenson

UW-WhitewaterSlide2

Literature ReviewsCritically analyze a part of a published body of knowledge

Provide a summary of previous research on a topicDiscuss published information relevant to a particular topic, issue, or theory

Provide a preface

to and rationale for engaging in

research or as a self-contained unit

Required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertationsSlide3

Where to Find Journal ArticlesResearch@UWW

Indexes and databasesInternetReference lists, bibliographies, footnotes, etc.Slide4

How to Find Journal ArticlesOriginal searches

Look up citations found in other sourcesFollow citation trail in databases, such as:

Science Citation Index

ScienceDirect

Sociological Abstracts

and Google ScholarSlide5

Write Your Literature ReviewIntroduction

Identifies topic

Indicates trends, gaps, or conflicts

Lists reasons for doing it

Explains criteria used, organization of the review, and scope

Body

Groups similar literature together

Summarizes each work

Conclusion

Summarizes major contributions

Points out major gaps, inconsistencies, and issues pertinent to future study

Provides an understanding of the relationship between the review topic and a larger area of studySlide6

Read More About Lit ReviewsLiterature Review? – F.D.

Bluford Library, NC A&T State University

http://

libguides.library.ncat.edu/literaturereview

Literature Reviews – Online Writing Lab

at Purdue

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/994/04

/

Review of Literature - The Writing Center, UW-Madison

http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html

Write a Literature Review –University Library, UC Santa Cruz

http://

guides.library.ucsc.edu/write-a-literature-reviewSlide7

Flow Diagram of Research ProcessSlide8
Slide9

APA Style ReferencesDocuments your research

Provides the data necessary to identify and find each sourceEnables finding and using sources

Correct data, punctuation,

and element order are

important

Establishes your credibility

Contains elements that are required for unique identification

If unsure,

provide more information rather than less Slide10

At a minimum each citation includes:Author

TitleDatePublication InformationSlide11

Seek HelpPublication

Manual of the American Psychological Association 6th

ed.

Citing References: APA Style

guide

Sites like OWL, UW-Madison’s Writing Center, and the APA blog

Ask a librarian

Use your wits:

If there is no specific guidance for your source, choose a similar example, combine examples, and otherwise modify to create a great citation Slide12

References ListDouble space

.5” hanging indentAlphabetical order by first elementList works by the same author(s) in chronological order

List works by the same author(s) in one year alphabetically and add a letter after the year. Also add a letter to the date in the parenthetical citation

Do not include retrieval datesSlide13

JOURNAL ARTICLE: two to seven authors; no DOI assigned, paginated by issue, print

Light, M. A., & Light, I. H.

(2008).

The geographic expansion of Mexican immigration in the United States and its implications for local law enforcement.

Law Enforcement Executive Forum Journal

,

8

(1),

73-82.

Author Last Name, First Initial. Middle Initial. & Author Last Name, First Initial. Middle initial.

(Publication year).

Article title.

Journal Title

,

volume number

(issue number),

first page-last page.Slide14

Journal Article from a Database What’s wrong?

Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2008). Primary Teachers' Conceptions of Giftedness.

Journal For The Education Of The Gifted

,

31

(4), 447-480.

Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2008). Primary teachers' conceptions of giftedness.

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

,

31

(4), 447-480. Retrieved from http://journals.prufrock.com/IJP/b/journal-for-the-education-of-the-giftedSlide15

What’s wrong?

Swaray

, R. (2011). Commodity buffer stock

redux

: The role of International Cocoa Organization in prices and incomes.

Journal Of Policy Modeling

,

33

(3), 361-369. DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.03.002

Swaray

, R. (2011). Commodity buffer stock

redux

: The role of International Cocoa Organization in prices and incomes.

Journal of Policy Modeling

,

33

(3), 361-369. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.03.002Slide16

What’s Wrong?

MCCLUSKEY, EMILY. (2010). Chocolate with a conscience.

Choice (0009-496X)

, 14-16. Web. 6/1/2012.

McCluskey

, E. (2010 Dec). Chocolate with a conscience.

Choice

, 14-16. Retrieved from http://www.choice.com.au/Slide17

What’s Wrong?

ERIK, E. (2007, August). H.I.V. Patients Anxious as Support Programs Cut Back.

New York Times (0362-4331

). p. 12. Retrieved from https://libproxy.uww.edu:9443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=28215647&login.asp& site=

ehost

-live

Erik, E. (2007, August 1). H.I.V. Patients Anxious as Support Programs Cut Back.

New York Times

. p. 12. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/Slide18

What’s Wrong?

Clemons, T. L., & National Research Center on the Gifted and, T. (2008). Underachieving Gifted Students: A Social Cognitive Model.

National Research Center On The Gifted And Talented

,

Clemons, T. L., & National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (2008). Underachieving gifted students: A social cognitive model. Retrieved from ERIC database.

(ED505382)Slide19

Parenthetical In-Text CitationsInclude the author's last name, if not written in the text, and the date

Always give page numbers for quotations (section 6.03)

When paraphrasing, the

Manual

encourages inclusion of a page number

(section 6.04)

… (

Chaitin

, 2016, p. 112).

or

Chaitin

(2016) found ... (p. 112).Slide20

Creating a Parenthetical Citation

Sillick

, T. J., &

Schutte

, N. S. (2006). Emotional intelligence and self-esteem mediate between perceived early parental love and adult happiness

. E-Journal of Applied Psychology

,

2

(2), 38-48. Retrieved from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/ejap/article/view/71/100

 

(

Sillick

&

Schutte

, 2006, p. 40)

Slide21

On Compiling an Annotated Bibliography

Plan your research

efficiently

Be organized, consistent, accurate, thorough, and detail oriented

Use Interlibrary Loan (ILL) to get articles, as you want the most relevant articles, not just those available immediately through the library

Set the

overall organization and content of each major

sectionSlide22

3 Ways to Organize Entries:

Alphabetically by author

Used least often

Chronologically by date of publication

Use when research has developed in stages, or

Use when research generally does

not

focus on particular works or topics

Topically by subject

Use when an author has written in several genres, or

Use when scholarship generally focuses on individual works or distinct topics

Keep it simple, as complicated breakdowns make it difficult to use

Consult your mentor for your requirementsSlide23

Three Major Tasks:

Examine the main articles thoroughly:

Reread all the primary texts and major studies

Compile a list of themes

Decide what types of works you will include:

Journal articles

(for this project)

Define your limits

Include all articles that are wholly or mostly about your topic, even those that seem wrong, outrageous, or out of date

Know your style manual wellSlide24

Three Major Tasks for

Compiling Entries:

Identifying scholarly articles

Keep a record of resources you have searched

Record and look at even vague, ambiguous, or uninformative articles that may discuss your topic

Obtaining journal articles

Find them in our print or online library collections

Find them on the Internet (try Google Scholar)

Use Interlibrary Loan through

ILLiad

Writing entries

Learn your citation style

Establish your subject termsSlide25

What Kind of Annotations?Approach or Degree of Evaluation

How overt will your evaluation be?

Evaluate based on quality and significance of a study, not your critical biases

Annotations that reflect prejudice against a particular methodology, critical theory, or type of scholarship breed distrust in usersSlide26

What type of Annotations?

ParaphraseUses the point of view of the item

Provides

a

short transcription in the order of the original

Commentary

Uses a disinterested perspective to cover the main concerns of the item and its approach to them

May describe the author's argument

Focuses on what the original is about rather

than in what it

says

You are the expert

Summary

Edits or organizes in a shorter form

Transcribes, but in comparison to commentary, summary is shorter

Is proportionally lengthy (longer articles=longer abstracts

)Slide27

What type of Annotations?

Descriptive

Main

purpose or idea

Contents

Author’s conclusions

Intended audience

Author’s research methods

Special features of the work such as illustrations, etc.

No value judgments

Critical

Author’s

bias or tone

Author’s qualifications for writing the work

Accuracy of information provided

Limitations or significant omissions

Contribution to the literature of the subject

Comparison with other works on the topic

Value judgments

Conclusions or recommendationsSlide28

Example: Descriptive Annotation

London, H. (1982). Five myths of the television age." Television Quarterly

10

(1), 81-89.

Herbert London, the Dean of Journalism at New York University and author of several books and articles, explains how television contradicts five commonly believed ideas. He uses specific examples of events seen on television, such as the assassination of John Kennedy, to illustrate his points. His examples have been selected to contradict such truisms as: "seeing is believing"; "a picture is worth a thousand words"; and "satisfaction is its own reward." London uses logical arguments to support his ideas which are his personal opinion. He doesn't refer to any previous works on the topic. London's style and vocabulary would make the article of interest to any reader.Slide29

Example: Critical Annotation

London, H. (1982). Five myths of the television age." Television Quarterly

10

(1), 81-89.

Herbert London, the Dean of Journalism at New York University and author of several books and articles, explains how television contradicts five commonly believed ideas. He uses specific examples of events seen on television, such as the assassination of John Kennedy, to illustrate his points. His examples have been selected to contradict such truisms as: "seeing is believing"; "a picture is worth a thousand words"; and "satisfaction is its own reward." London uses logical arguments to support his ideas which are his personal opinion. He doesn't refer to any previous works on the topic; however, for a different point of view, one should refer to Joseph Patterson's, "Television is Truth" (

The Journal of Television

45 (6) November/December 1995: 120-135). London's style and vocabulary would make the article of interest to any reader. The article clearly illustrates London's points, but does not explore their implications, leaving the reader with many unanswered questions.Slide30

What style of Annotations?Tense

Historical present is most commonP

assive voice should be avoided

Use a variety of verbs (See

handout for examples)

Sentences

Compose “paraphrase

” annotations

with complete sentences In “commentary

” annotations,

subjectless

sentences are acceptable. However, do not omit articles, prepositions, etc. as this reduces readabilitySlide31

Final Comments:Consistency is important

Reread your entries to check for

consistency

Good

annotations give the essence of the work

Read the entire work, not just beginning and end

Lastly, number your entriesSlide32

References

Annotated bibliographies. (2012). Retrieved from http://libguides.library.umkc.edu/annotatedbibliography

Guidelines for preparing an annotated bibliography, (n. d.) Retrieved from http://library.uwb.edu/ guides/annotations.html

Harner

, James L. (2000).

On compiling an annotated bibliography

(2nd ed.). New York: Modern Language Association of America.

How to write annotated bibliographies. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.library.mun.ca/guides/howto/ annotated_bibl.php

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association

(6th ed.). (2010).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Reed, Lois E. (

n.d

.). Performing a literature review. Retrieved from http://www.iris.ethz.ch/msrl/education/

iris_studies

/

pdf

/ literature_review.pdf