September 2016 Slide 1 TGax MAC Ad Hoc - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

September 2016

Slide 1

TGax MAC Ad Hoc September 2016 Meeting Agenda

Date: 2016-09-12

Authors:

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

Slide2

IEEE 802.11 TGaxHigh Efficiency WLANMAC Ad HocCo-Chairs: Brian Hart (Cisco Systems)Reza Hedayat (Newracom)Eric Wong (Apple)

Slide 2Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide3

Slide 3

Agenda ItemsCall meeting to order Patent policy, etc. (Call for Potentially Essential Patents)Call for submissionsSet and approve agendaNote ad hoc rules // Slides 13-14Note MAC ad hoc sessions this week Mon: PM2Tue: AM2, PM2 Wed:PM1, PM2Technical Presentations approved by 802.11ax chair for presentation this week, and related straw pollsAny other technical presentations Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide4

Slide 4

Slide

4Meeting Protocol, Attendance, Voting & Document Status

Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slotCell Phones to be silent or OffRegister your attendance via https://imat.ieee.org while on a meeting SSID (e.g.

Verilan-secure)Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission, be sure it does not contain company logos or advertisingQuestions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, Member’s AreaContact Jon Rosdahl –

jrosdahl@ieee.orgReza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide5

Slide 5

Patent Policy and Other GuidelinesSee the following 5 slidesReza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide6

Slide 6

Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee:Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentationAdvise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development.Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard

Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom.

The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance.It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference.

Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board.

(Optional to be shown)

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide7

Slide 7

Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform

All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:

“

Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)

” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’

s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)

The above does not apply if the patent

claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group

Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2

Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged

No duty to perform a patent search

Slide #1

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide8

Slide 8

Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html

Slide #2

If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html

This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide9

Slide 9

Call for Potentially Essential PatentsIf anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now orProvide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible orCause an LOA to be submitted

Slide #3

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide10

Slide 10

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.

Technical considerations remain primary focusDon’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.Don

’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.--------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

Slide #4

Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide11

September MAC SubmissionsIncluding leftover submissions since July 2016

Slide 11Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

DCN

Title

Author

Notes11-16/0864d0.1 comment resolution on clause 6Yasuhiko InoueMON/PM1

11-16/0869

Comment resolution section 9.3 TWT

Zhou Lan

 MON/PM1

11-16/0881

Comment resolution on ROMI

Jayh Park

 MON/PM1

11-16/0882

Comment resolution on TOMI

Alfred Asterjadhi

 MON/PM1.

Not

SPed

yet

11-16/0883

Comment resolution for CID152

Jayh Park

 MON/PM1

11-16/0884

Spec. Text for HE Operation element and AID Assign Rule

Jianhan Liu

 TUE/AM2

11-16/0913

SU Multi-TID Rules

Jarkko Kneckt

 

11-16/0917

Text for TID value of ALL ACK signaling

Woojin Ahn

 

Withdrawn

11-16/0918

Discussions on Partial BSS Color

Geonjung Ko

 

Withdrawn

11-16/0924

NAV resetting with RTS/MU-RTS

Weimin

Xing

 TUE/AM2

11-16/0925

Spex

text on NAV resetting with RTS/MU-RTS

Weimin

Xing

 TUE/AM2

11-16/0941

CR HE Fragmentation - part 2

Ming Gan

 TUE/AM2

11-16/0942

CR Service Field

Ming

Gan

 SP deferred to PHY ad hoc

11-16/0960

AP access procedure for UL MU operation

Jinsoo

Ahn

Presented in telecon. No SP

11-16/0961

Consideration on Multi-STA

BlockAck

Optimization

Hanseul

Hong

 

TUE/AM2

11-16/0962

EDCA rules-follow up 1

Jing Ma

Presented in telecon.

SPed

in TUE/AM2

Slide12

September MAC SubmissionsIncluding leftover submissions since July 2016

Slide 12Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

DCN

Title

Author

Notes11-16/0998Rules for 2 EDCA parameterslaurent cariou TUE/AM2

11-16/1110

comment resolution on

subclause

10.22.2 and 10.22.4

Yongho Seok

TUE/PM2

11-16/1131

comment resolution on mu

ack

policy

Yongho Seok

TUE/PM2

11-16/1154

MAC CR for CID 966

Weimin Xing

Withdrawn

11-16/1157

Comment resolution on SU_MU ACK procedures

Jeongki

Kim

TUE/PM2

11-16/1173

Comment Resolution on Two NAVs - Part II

Po-Kai Huang

11-16/1180

Proposed text changes for MU EDCA parameters

laurent

cariou

TUE/AM2

11-16/1181

CW value after UL MU procedure

Woojin

Ahn

TUE/PM2

11-16/1182

HE Sounding Feedback Segmentation

Liwen Chu

Withdrawn

11-16/1183

MU RTS CTS data rate comment

Liwen Chu

MU CIDs. Transferred

11-16/1184

A-MPDU 25.10 25.10.2 comment

resolution

Liwen Chu

TUE/PM2

11-16/1185

A-MPDU 25.10.3 comment resolution

Liwen Chu

11-16/1186

A-MPDU Content Comment Resolution

Liwen Chu

11-16/1188

MAC Capabilities in HE Capabilities IE

Alfred Asterjadhi

TUE/PM2

11-16/1189

CC0-TWT operation

Alfred Asterjadhi

11-16/1195

MAC Clarifications

Alfred Asterjadhi

11-16/1204

Intra-PPDU Power Save for a Multiple BSSID Set Case

Geonjung Ko

11-16/1205

Text for Intra-PPDU Power Save for a Multiple BSSID Set Case

Geonjung Ko

11-16/1210

Comment Resolution on MU acknowledgement procedure

Junichi Iwatani

11-16/1211

CR_CID_122_576_972_2598

Huizhao Wang

11-16/1213

CR TWT and HE element related

Matthew Fischer

11-16/1220

MU mode EDCA control

Jinsoo Ahn

11-16/1234

Spec Text for TWT Protectioin field

Hanseul Hong

11-16/1236

Text for Partial BSS Color and AID Assignment Rule

Geonjung

Ko

Withdrawn

11-16/1237

setting-quiet-time-period

Chao-Chun Wang

11-16/1238

Setting Quiet time period - text

Chao-Chun Wang

Slide13

Straw-poll MAC-CR1 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.4 the comment resolutions in document 16/864r5 for CIDs: 83, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1238, 1239, 1240, 2292, 2293, 2294, 2304, 2305, 2306, 1125, 1230, 1241, 1596,1869, 2420, 1123 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 13Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide14

Straw-poll MAC-CR2 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/869r2 for CIDs: 1315, 2424, 2589, 2590, 2591 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 14Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide15

Straw-poll MAC-CR3 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/881r1 for CIDs: 2, 60, 61, 184, 185, 207, 445, 446, 655, 685, 775, 856, 1223, 1224, 1562, 1565, 1568, 1569, 1572, 1573, 1574, 2200, 2236, 2238, 2239, 2328, 2330, 2657 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 15Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide16

Straw-poll MAC-CR4 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/883r1 for CID: 152 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 16Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide17

Straw-poll MAC-1 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.4 the proposed text in document 16/884r3. Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 17Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide18

Straw-poll MAC-2 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.4 the proposed text in document 16/925r1. Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 18Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide19

Straw-poll MAC-CR5 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/941r0 for CIDs: 1477, 675, 423, 166, 1823, 2270, 2268, 2254, 2198, 1824, 1818, 1800, 1796, 1663, 1491, 1489, 1488, 2630 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 19Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide20

Straw-poll MAC-3 Do you agree to accept the spec changes proposed in document 16/1180r1. Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 20Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide21

Straw-poll MAC-CR6 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/881r2 for CIDs: 2, 60, 61, 184, 185, 207, 445, 446, 655, 685, 775, 856, 1223, 1224, 1562, 1565, 1568, 1569, 1572, 1573, 1574, 2200, 2236, 2238, 2239, 2328, 2330, 2657 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 21Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide22

Straw-poll MAC-CR-7 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/1110r0 for CIDs: 2468, 2470, 2448, 2450, 2451, 809 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 22Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide23

Straw-poll MAC-CR8 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/1131r2 for CIDs: 2445, 2457, 2494, 2395 Results: Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 23Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide24

Straw-poll MAC-CR9 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.4 the comment resolutions in document 16/1157r0 for CIDs: 129, 130, 131, 132, 405, 406, 407, 408, 672 Results:Strawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 24Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide25

Straw-poll MAC-CR10 Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/1184r1 for CIDs: 2258, 2446, 1588, 1645 Results: Y/N/AStrawpoll passed with no objection

Slide 25Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide26

Straw-poll MAC-CR-X Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.1 the comment resolutions in document 16/XXXr1 for CIDs: … Results: Y/N/A

Slide 26Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide27

Straw-poll MAC-X Do you agree to add to the 11ax specification D0.4 the comment resolutions in document 16/xyzr2 for CIDs: … Results:YNA

Slide 27Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide28

Ad Hoc Groups Operation (1/2)Governing document is 15/075r0Proposed changes to the specification framework shall be discussed in the ad hoc groups first, which are then brought to the Taskgroup for an approval vote.A straw poll (doesn’t require voting rights) result of >=75% is required within an Ad Hoc to approve the resolution of all or part of an issue and forward that resolved item to the Taskgroup where it becomes a motion that requires >=75% approval to modify the specification framework or the draft specification. The straw poll affection the TG specification framework shall include Do you agree to add to the TG Specification Framework:x.y.z. [brief description of the feature]In the case a consensus can not be reached within an Ad Hoc group (a stalemate that prohibits further progress), the subject is moved to the Taskgroup if an Ad Hoc straw poll vote to move the subject to the Taskgroup achieves >50% approval.

Slide 28Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide29

Ad Hoc Groups Operation (2/2)Governing document is 15/075r0A motion passing with >50% in the Taskgroup shall be sufficient to move an issue previously assigned to an Ad Hoc group to any Ad Hoc group. A straw poll vote of >50% is required in an Ad Hoc group to refuse an issue from the Taskgroup.An issue may be sent from one Ad Hoc to another if both the sending Ad Hoc and the receiving Ad Hoc approve straw polls for taking the respective actions with >50% approval. A notice should be sent to the reflector indicating the approval of a straw poll to move an issue.During Taskgroup face to face Plenary and Interim sessions, Chairs for each of the Functional Block Ad Hocs shall report on Progress and Content to the Entire Taskgroup. These Update sessions provide the opportunity for peer review to ensure the creation of a coherent Specification.

Slide 29Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide30

Slide 30

Backup SlidesReza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide31

Slide 31

Strawpoll MAC 1-1: Premotioncontribution-file-nameDo you agree to add the TGax SFD: ABCY: N: Abstain: Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide32

Slide 32

Approval of MAC Ad Hoc MinutesApprove TGax MAC ad hoc minutes of meetings and teleconferences from the July 2015 meeting until today: <Doc reference>Mover: Seconder:Y: N: Abstain: Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide33

Slide 33

Strawpoll xxxx (“Testing the temperature of the room”)Do you … xxxxY: N: Abstain: Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016

Slide34

Slide 34

Strawpoll xxxx (“Premotion”)Do you agree to add to the TG Specification Frame work document?x.y.z. <feature description>Y: N: Abstain: Reza Hedayat (Newracom)

September 2016