University of Victoria Summer 2011 Pascal Courty Economics of Strategy Objectives for today Discuss course outline Introduction to economics of strategy Academic influences Course objectives ID: 272456
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Economics of Strategy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Economics of Strategy
University of Victoria
Summer 2011
Pascal CourtySlide2
Economics of Strategy
Objectives for today
Discuss
course outline
Introduction to
economics of strategy
Academic influencesSlide3
Course objectives:
learn how market environment and firm’s strategy influence firm performance
Learning approach: mix of formal lectures
(1/2), discussion of research articles (1/4),
and class discussion(1/4)Material: book, slides, weekly emails, research articlesPre-requisites: Micro, IO, game theoryExpectations: read book chapters, read research articles, follow instructions in weekly emailsGrading: pb sets (40%), midterm (30%), essay (30%)
Course outlineSlide4
Part I. Incentives, Firms, and Markets
Chapters 3, 5, 6, 16, 17
Performance measurement and incentives within firms
Vertical boundaries of the firm
Part II. Markets and Competitive AnalysisChapters 9, 10, 11, 12Thinking strategically and strategic commitmentPricing rivalryEntryIndustry analysisPart III. Competitive Advantage and Industry DynamicsChapters 13, 14, 15Competitive advantageInnovation and industry dynamics
Course ContentsSlide5
Economics of Strategy
Academic Influences
Industrial organization (analysis of market competition)
Game theory (strategic interactions)
Economics of organization (transaction cost economics, contract theory)Incentive theory (personnel economics, information theory)Focus can be on managerial ability to change firm position (organizational behaviour) or market environment (competition economics)Slide6
Research articles
Part I. Incentives, Firms, and Markets
The Dynamics of Franchise Contracting: Evidence from Panel Data. Francine Lafontaine and Kathryn L. Shaw. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 107, No. 5 (October 1999) (pp. 1041-1080)
Peers at Work.
Alexandre Mas and Enrico Moretti. American Economic Review 2009, 99:1, 112–145.Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective. Pankaj Ghemawat. The Business History Review, Vol. 76, No. 1 (Spring, 2002), pp. 37-74Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Michael C. Jensen and Kevin J. Murphy. Journal of Political Economy, 98. Page 225 of 225-264Part II. Markets and Competitive AnalysisHow Much Does Industry Matter, Really? by Anita M McGAHAN, Michael E Porter. Strategic Management Journal (1997) Volume: 18, Issue: S1, Publisher: John Wiley \& Sons, Pages: 15-30Commitment to a Process Innovation: Nucor, USX, and Thin-Slab Casting. Pankaj Ghemawat. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy Volume 2, Issue 1, pages 135–161, March 1993.Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. Steven Klepper. American Economic Review. 1996, vol
86, 562-58.
Klepper
, S., and K. Simons, "The Making of an Oligopoly: Survival and Technological Change in the Evolution of the U.S. Tire Industry," Journal of Political Economy 108 (2000), 728-760.
What do we know about entry? P. A.
Geroski
International Journal of Industrial Organization. Volume 13, Issue 4, December 1995, Pages 421-440
Part III. Competitive Advantage and Industry Dynamics
Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies. Marianne Bertrand and Antoinette
Schoar
.
Quarrterly
Journal of Economics, Nov 2003,
vol
143. Page 1169 of 1169-1208
Does management matter? Evidence from India. Nicholas Bloom, Benn
Eifert
,
Aprajit
Mahajan
, David McKenzie and John Roberts. Mimeo 2011.
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries. Nick Bloom and John Van
Reenen
. Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 2007.
Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Rebecca M. Henderson and Kim B. Clark. Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35, 9-30.
Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Rebecca Henderson and Iain Cockburn. Strategic Management Journal. 1994,
vol
15, 63-84.
Exploiting a Cost Advantage and Coping with a Cost Disadvantage. David
Besanko
, David
Dranove
, Mark
Shanley
. Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Feb., 2001), pp. 221-235
On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory. Luis Cabral and Jose Mata. American Economic Review, 2003. 93, 1075-90. Slide7
Slides by: Richard Ponarul,
California State University, Chico
Copyright 2010 John Wiley Sons, Inc.
Chapter 4
The Power of Principles: A Historical PerspectiveSlide8
1840, 1910, and Today
The years 1840, 1910 and 2009 represent widely disparate business conditions.
The general economic principles behind business strategy are enduring.
Business practices evolve with changing environment.Slide9
Doing Business in 1840
Numerous intermediaries - Farmers to factors to brokers agents to buyers
Substantial price risk for participants
Infrequent transactions
Scarcity of information regarding sales and prices of comparable goodsSlide10
Infrastructure in 1840
Infrastructure in transportation, communication and finance were poorly developed in 1840.
Poor infrastructure meant the dominance of small family run firms.
Markets were local.Slide11
Transportation in 1840
Railroads, in their infancy, were fragmented. National railway network had not yet arrived.
Waterways were used for long distance transportation. Yet routes were limited.
With poor transportation, producers were limited to local marketsSlide12
Communication in 1840
Postal service was the dominant mode of long distance communication.
Postal service relied on the horse and stagecoach.
Telegraph was expensive and was used only for important time-sensitive information.Slide13
Finance in 1840
Most businesses were sole proprietorships or partnerships which made long term debt difficult to obtain.
Shares of stock were not easily traded and cost of capital was high.
No institutional mechanism existed for handling business risk.
Futures trading to manage price risk was yet to come about.Slide14
Production Technology in 1840
Most factories used century old methods of production.
Textile manufacture was mechanized.
Use of standardized parts (prevalent in clocks and guns then) was just beginning.
Scale intensive industries and high volume production were non existent.Slide15
Government in 1840
Government was involved in large infrastructure investments such as canals and railroads.
Later in the century government regulation of the business environment was emerging.
Prime Meridian Conference led to the system of standard time.Slide16
Business in 1840
Technology limited production to traditional modes.
Production served local markets.
Without transportation infrastructure and access to large markets, mass production technologies would not have been useful.Slide17
Business in 1840
Without communication infrastructure, information on prices, sellers and buyers was not readily available.
Credit was available based on personal relationships.
As a result businesses were small and informally organized.Slide18
Business Conditions in 1910
Mass-production technologies made possible high volume low cost manufacture of goods.
Railroads dominated transportation and allowed mass distributors to reach widely scattered customers.
Telegraph and telephones greatly improved long distance communications.Slide19
Business Conditions in 1910
Manufacturing became more vertically integrated.
Multidivisional firms emerged in response to the size and complexity of operations.
Industries were becoming concentrated.
As standardization increased so did labor related conflicts.Slide20
Finance in 1910
Securities markets traded shares of large industrial firms.
Credit bureaus made credit related information easily accessible.
Innovations appeared in monitoring and reporting business activities.
Public disclosure of accounting information was in vogue.Slide21
Government in 1910
Government regulation extended to such areas as corporate law, antitrust and worker safety.
Increased regulation forced managers to collect a lot of data on internal operations.
Mandatory secondary schooling provided the labor force needed by large bureaucratic organizations.Slide22
Business in 1910
Expanded infrastructure allowed firms to expand their markets, product lines and production scale.
New technologies allowed high volume standardized production.
Growth of financial infrastructure made large scale firms viable.Slide23
Doing Business Today
Large vertically integrated firms have been declining.
Alliances and joint ventures could work better than mergers and acquisitions
.
Firms adopt complex matrix structures.Slide24
Transportation Infrastructure Today
Air
, water,
rail and ground transportation have become better coordinated.
Sophisticated communication and data processing technologies enable container shipping.Cities like Atlanta have grown relying on air transport in spite of poor rail and water connections.Slide25
Communications Technology Today
Capacity for instantaneous transmission of complex information makes possible global markets for products and services.
Technology has enhanced worker productivity.
Coordination of activities has become easier with modern computer and communication technologies.Slide26
Finance
Regulation of banking and securities markets resulted in a stable financial services sector.
Capital markets and financial institutions became more active in evaluating firm performance.
Globalization of financial markets made many mergers and acquisitions possible.
Liquidity crisis of 2008 has slowed economic and entrepreneurial activity.Slide27
Production Technology
Modern technologies such as CAD/CAM have made low cost tailor-made production feasible.
Use of new technologies often means reorganizing the firm around these technologies.Slide28
Government
In some areas (airlines, trucking and financial services) traditional regulation has been relaxed.
Regulation has increased in other areas (workplace safety, discrimination and environmental protection).Slide29
Government
Intergovernmental treaties and agreements create regional free trade zones.
Government’s anti trust policy encourages in-house development of capabilities.
Government policy supports basic research and the commercialization of R & D projects.Slide30
Business Today
With rising demand from developing nations the market size has increased.
Firms focus on a narrow range of activities and enjoy the economies of scale.
Financial innovation enables faster growth of firms and the ability of new entrants to challenge the incumbents.Slide31
Infrastructure in Emerging Markets
Unlike the advanced nations, many developing nations still lack transportation and finance infrastructures.
Businesses are reluctant to invest in countries where corruption, cronyism and conflicts are rampant.Slide32
Business Conditions and Strategy
Business conditions change over time and so do the optimal strategies.
Principles needed to arrive at successful strategies do not change.
Recipes change from period to period but principles behind the recipes do not.