Peter Anderson Grazier ClermontAlpha brother Paul Anderson starting pump jack The Process of Protecting a Grazing Operation Outside of the Proposed Mining Operation Objection to EIS No precedence for projects this size ID: 547308
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "In the Land Court v’s Hancock Coal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
In the Land Court v’s Hancock Coal
Peter Anderson, Grazier Clermont/Alpha
brother Paul Anderson, starting pump jackSlide2Slide3
The Process of Protecting a Grazing Operation Outside of the Proposed Mining Operation
Objection to EISNo precedence for projects this size
Make Good Agreements vs Make Good ProvisionsNegotiations with the Multi-National and multiple personnelBreakdown of NegotiationsLand Court of Queensland-
Hancock Coal Pty Ltd v Kelly &
Ors
and Dept. of Environment and Heritage Protection (No.4) [2014] QLC 12
The decision by Member Smith
The fallout and costs, still no MGASlide4
Suggestions for amendments to the Water Act
The distance from the mining lease where a miner should be required to enter into MGA with LandholdersTime Frame for MGALevel of drawdown to trigger MGA
Cumulative modellingNo landholder should be left in the position of going into the Land Court to seek security over their groundwater hence their business & livelihoodSlide5
“Water is where you find it”
The late Neil Anderson, “Glenlea Downs”, Clermont