/
PRACTICE PARAMETER PRACTICE PARAMETER

PRACTICE PARAMETER - PDF document

susan
susan . @susan
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-09-06

PRACTICE PARAMETER - PPT Presentation

TheAmericanCollegeRadiologywithmorethan30000memberstheprincipalorganizationradiologistsradiationoncologistsandclinical medicalphysiciststheUnitedStatesTheCollegenonprofitprofessionalsocietywhose ID: 951678

bone journal clinical osteoporosis journal bone osteoporosis clinical practice acr densitometry parameter facr international american dxa xray mineral society

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "PRACTICE PARAMETER" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

PRACTICE PARAMETER TheAmericanCollegeRadiology,withmorethan30,000members,theprincipalorganizationradiologists,radiationoncologists,andclinical medicalphysiciststheUnitedStates.TheCollegenonprofitprofessionalsocietywhoseprimarypurposesareadvancethescienceradiology, improveradiologicservicesto thepatient,studythesocioeconomicaspectsthepracticeradiology,andencouragecontinuingeducationforradiologists, radiationoncologists,medical physicists, and personspracticing alliedprofessional fields. TheAmericanCollegeRadiologywill scienceradiologyandimprovethequalityservicepatientsthroughouttheUnitedStates.Existingpracticeparametersandtechnicalstandardswill reviewedforrevisionrenewal,appropriate,theirfifth anniversarysooner,if indicated. Each practice parameterand technicalstandard,representing policystatement theCollege,hasundergone thorough consensusprocesswhichhasbeen subjectedextensivereviewandapproval.Thepracticeparametersandtechnicalstandardsrecognizethat therapeuticradiologyrequiresspecifictraining,skills,andtechniques,describedeachdocument.Reproductionmodificationthepublished practiceparameterand technical standard those entitiesnot providingthese servicesis not authorized. Revised(Resolution ACRPRACTICE PARAMETER FORTHE PERFORMANCEENERGY RAYABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA) PREAMBLEThisdocumenteducationaltooldesignedassistpractitionersprovidingappropriateradiologiccareforpatients.PracticeParametersandTechnicalStandards Thepracticemedicineinvolvesonlythescience,alsotheartdealingwiththeprevention,diagnosis,alleviation,andtreatmentdisease.Thevarietyandcomplexityhumanconditionsmakeimpossiblealwaysreachthemostappropriatediagnosispredictwithcertaintyparticularresponsetreatment.Therefore,shouldrecognizedthatadherencetheguidancethisdocumentwillassureaccurate IowaMedicalSocietyandIowaSocietyAnesthesiologistsIowaBoardNursingN.W.2d.826(IowaIowaSupremeCourtrefusesfindthat theACRTechnicalStandardfor ManagementtheUseRadiation specialtymedicalorganizationsareusefuldeterminingthedutyowedthestandardcareapplicablegivensituation”eventhoughACRstandardsthemselvesnot establish thestandardcare. PRACTICE PARAMETER INTRODUCTIONThispracticeparameterwasrevisedcollaborativelyby the AmericanCollegeRadiology(ACR),the SocietyforPediatricRadiology(SPR), andtheSocietySkeletalRadiology(SSR).Dualenergyrayabsorptiometry(DXA)[1]clinicallyproven,accurate,andreproduciblemethodmeasuringmineraldensity(BMD)thelumbarspine,proximalfemur,forearm,andwholee-7]. It is usedprimarilytheiagnosisandmanagementosteoporosisandotherdiseasestatescharacterizedabnormalBMD,wellto monitorresponsetherapyfortheseconditions[8,9]mayalsousedmeasurewholecomposition[10includingnonboneleanmass(LM)andfatmass(FM).DXAmeasuredandmayhelpfulassessingnumberconditions,includingsarcopeniaandcachexia.ThispracticeparameteroutlinestheprinciplesperforminghighqualityDXA.INDICATIONS CONTRAINDICATIONSDXAmeasurementBMD,indicatedwheneverclinicaldecisionlikelydirectlyinfluencedtheresultthetest[13]Indicationsforinclude,arelimitedto,individualswithsuspectedabnormalBMD,LM,FM,including[2,5,7,14 Allwomenagedyearsandolderandmenagedyearsandolder(asymptomaticscreening)Allpostmenopausalwomenyoungerthan 65yearsand

menyoungerthanyearswhohaveriskfactorsforosteoporosisincluding:historyfracturethewrist,hip,spine,proximalhumeruswithminimaltrauma,excludingpathologicfracturesFamilyhistoryosteoporoticfractureLow mass(lessthan127lbs57.6CurrentusecigarettesExcessiveusealcoholLossheight,thoracickyphosisIndividualsanyagewithfindingssuggestivedemineralizationfragilityfracturesimagingstudiessuchradiographs,computedtomography(CT),magneticresonanceimaging(MRI)Individualsreceiving(orexpectedreceive)glucocorticoid therapyformorethanmonthsIndividualsbeginningreceivinglongtermtherapywithmedicationsknownadverselyaffectBMD(eg,anticonvulsantdrugs,androgendeprivationtherapy,aromataseinhibitortherapychronicheparin)Althoughprotonpumpinhibitors(PPIs)mayassociatedwith increasedriskfragilityfractures,routinescreeningBMDrecommendedpatientsreceivingPPIstheabsenceotherriskfactor[24] Individualswithan endocrinedisorderknownto adverselyaffectBMD(eg,hyperparathyroidism,hyperthyroidism,Cushing’ssyndrome)PostpubertalhypogonadalmaleswithsurgicallychemotherapeuticallyinducedcastrationIndividualswithmedicalconditionsassociatedwithabnormalBMD,suchas:ChronicrenalfailureRheumatoidarthritisandotherinflammatoryarthritides PRACTICE PARAMETER Eatingdisorders,includinganorexianervosaand bulimiaGastrointestinalmalabsorptionsprueOsteomalaciaAcromegaly,chronicalcoholism,establishedcirrhosisMultiplemyelomaGastricbypassforobesity.Theaccuracyin thesepatientsmightbe affectedobesityOrganTransplantationProlongedimmobilizationProlongedpoornutritionIndividualsbeingmonitoredto:Assesstheeffectivenessof osteoporosisdrugtherapy[25]FollowmedicalconditionsassociatedwithabnormalBMDmayindicatedtoolmeasureregionalandwholefatand(eg,forpatientswithmalabsorption,cancer, eatingdisorders)[22,26PediatricIndicationsandConsiderationsIndicationsforperformingBMDexaminationsandsubsequentassessmentchildrendiffersignificantlyfromthoseadults.InterpretingBMDmeasurementschildrencomplicatedthegrowingskeleton.unabletakeintoaccountchangesbody and skeletalsizeduringgrowth,limitingits usefulnesslongitudinalstudies.Forexample,increaseDXAmeasuredarealBMDthespinemorelikelyreflectionthechangevertebralsizethanchangeBMD.Becausequantitativecomputedtomography(QCT)assessbothvolumeanddensitytheaxialandappendicularskeleton,maymoreusefulthanchildren.Becauselowerradiationdose,peripheralQCT,whichassessestheextremities,maypreferableto centralQCTin pediatricpatients. childrenandadolescents,BMDmeasurementindicatedwheneverclinicaldecisionlikelydirectlyinfluencedtheresultthetest.IndicationsforDXAinclude,butarelimited[29]Individualsreceiving(orexpectedreceive)glucocorticoidtherapyformorethanmonthsIndividualsreceivingradiationchemotherapyformalignancyIndividualswithan endocrinedisorderknownto adverselyaffectBMD(eg,hyperparathyroidism,hyperthyroidism,growthhormonedeficiency,Cushing’ssyndrome)Individualswithbone dysplasiasknownto haveexcessivefracturerisk(osteogenesisimperfecta,osteopetrosis)highbonedensitysuchwithprolongedexposurefluorideIndividualswithmedicalconditionsthatcouldalterBMD,suchas:ChronicrenalfailureRheumatoidarthritisandotherinflammatoryarthritidesEatingdisorders,includinganorexianervosaand bulimiaOrgantrans

plantationProlongedimmobilizationGastrointestinalmalabsorption,includingthatrelatedCysticFibrosisSprueInflammatoryboweldiseaseMalnutritionOsteomalaciaVitamindeficiencyAcromegalyCirrhosis PRACTICE PARAMETER HIVinfectionProlongedexposurefluoridesContraindicationsThereareabsolutecontraindicationsperformingDXA[30]However,examinationmaylimitedvaluerequiremodificationthetechniquereschedulingtheexaminationsomesituations,including:RecentlyadministeredoralcontrastradionuclidesPregnancySeveredegenerativechangesfracturedeformityin themeasurementareaImplants,hardware,devices,otherforeignmaterialin themeasurementareaThepatient’sinabilityattaincorrectpositionand/orremainmotionlessforthe measurementExtremeshighlowmassindexthatmayadverselyaffecttheabilityobtainaccuratemeasurements.QCT maydesirablealternativetheseindividuals[31Forthepregnantpotentiallypregnantpatient,seethe ACRSPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Adolescents and Women with Ionizing Radiation [34] QUALIFICATIONS ANDRESPONSIBILITIESOF PERSONNELFor physicianregistered radiologist assistant, and radiologic technologist qualifications see the ACRAAPMSIIM SPR Practice Parameter for Digital Radiography [35]For Qualified Medical Physicist qualifications, see the For Qualified Medical Physicist qualifications see the ACRAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of DualEnergy XRay Absorptiometry (DXA) Equipment [36]Additional specific qualifications and responsibilities include: Physicia[37Theexaminationmustperformedunderthesupervisionandinterpretedlicensedphysicianwiththefollowingqualifications:Knowledgeand understandingbonestructure,metabolism,and osteoporosisDocumentedtrainingandunderstandingthephysicsrayabsorptionandradiationprotection,includingthepotentialhazardsradiationexposurebothpatientsandpersonnelandthemonitoringrequirementsKnowledgeandunderstandingtheprocessDXAdataandimageacquisition,includingproperpatientpositioningand placementregionsinterest,and artifactsandanatomicabnormalitiesthatmayfalselyincreasedecreasemeasured valuesKnowledgeandunderstandingtheanalysisandreportingincluding,limitedto,BMD,score, score,WHO fractureriskassessmenttool(FRAXandtheWHO classificationsystemKnowledgeand understandingthe criteriaforcomparisonserialmeasurements,includinglimitationscomparingmeasurementsmadedifferenttechniquesanddifferentdevices,therationalebehindprecisiontesting,andthestatisticalsignificanceserialchangesBMDAwarenessotherbone densitometrytechniques,includingQCT,peripheralQCT,peripheralDXA,andquantitativeultrasound(QUS),fulfillconsultativerolerecommendingfurtherstudies,futuremeasurements,diagnosticproceduresto confirmsuspectedabnormalitiesseenimages PRACTICE PARAMETER Whenperformingfortheassessmentcomposition,thephysicianshouldhaveadditionalknowledgeand understandingof:Analysisandreportingincludingnotlimitedappendicularleanmass(ALM),and visceraladiposetissue(VAT)Othermodalitiesusedassesscomposition,includingCT,MRI,QUS,bioelectricalimpedanceanalysis,andanthropomorphicanalysisThe supervising physician must be responsible for overseeing the DXA facility and its equipment quality control program.

The physician accepts final responsibility for the quality of all DXA examinations.The physician’s continuing medical education should be in accordance with the ACR Practice Parameter for Continuing Medical Education (CME) [40] Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine TechnologistTheexaminationmustbe performedtechnologistwiththefollowingqualificationsandresponsibilities:Responsibilityforpatientcomfortandsafety,preparingandproperlypositioningthepatient,placementregionsinterestforBMDmeasurements,monitoringthepatientduringthemeasurements,andobtainingthe measurementsprescribedthesupervisingphysicianDocumentedformaltrainingtheusetheDXAequipment,includingallmanufacturerspecifiedqualityassuranceprocedure[41]Knowledgeandfamiliaritywiththemanufacturer’soperatormanualforthespecificscannermodelbeingusedResponsibilityfordeterminingprecisionerrorandcalculatingleastsignificantchange(LSC)(seesectionVII.Statelicensureand/orcertification,required.Organizationsprovidingcertificationin bone densitometryincludetheAmericanRegistryRadiologicTechnologists(ARRT),theNuclearMedicineTechnologyCertificationBoard(NMTCB),andthe InternationalSocietyforClinicalDensitometry(ISCD)Thetechnologist’scontinuingmedicaleducationshouldaccordancewiththenationalregistrystatelicensurerequirementswhereapplicable.SPECIFICATIONS OFTHE EXAMINATIONThe writtenelectronicrequestfora DXAexaminationshouldprovidesufficientinformationto demonstratethe medicalnecessitytheexaminationandallowforproperperformanceandinterpretation. Documentationthatsatisfiesmedicalnecessityincludessignsandsymptomsand/orrelevanthistory(includingknowndiagnoses).Additionalinformationregardingthespecificreasonfortheexaminationprovisionaldiagnosiswouldhelpfulandmaytimesneededallowfortheproperperformanceandinterpretationof the examination.Therequestfortheexaminationmustoriginatedphysicianotherappropriatelylicensedhealthcareprovider.Theaccompanyingclinicalinformationshouldbe providedphysicianotherappropriatelylicensedhealthcareproviderfamiliarwiththepatient’sclinicalproblemquestionandconsistentwiththestatescopepracticerequirements.(ACR Resolutionadopted2006 revised2016, Resolutionhistoryshouldbe obtainedfromthe patientregardingriskfactors(aslistedin sectionIII),and priorsurgerythatcouldpotentiallyaffecttheaccuracymeasurements.Questionnairesfoundwww.iscd.org or www.nof.org . PRACTICE PARAMETER Standardexaminationadultsshould,minimum,consistposteroanteriorscanthelumbarspineandeitherhip[7,42However,imagingbothhipswouldprovideinformationthelowesthipBMD,andthefuturehipbecomesunavailableutilize(eg,fractureand/orsurgery),therewouldcomparisoninformationavailablefortheunaffectedhipdetermineBMDchange.instanceswherethisfeasible(extensiveabdominalaorticcalcification,degenerativediseasethelumbarspinehip,scoliosis,fractures,implants),alternatesitescanusedforevaluatingthepatient,includingtheotherhip,nondominantforearm,whole[46]thenondominantforearmmayusefulindividualswhoexceedtheweightlimitthe DXA tableandindividualswithhyperparathyroidism[7]childrenandadolescents,DXAexaminationshouldconsistexaminationthelumbarspineandwholebody[7,4750]Whatacquiredmayvarywiththeindication.individualswithquadriplegi

ccerebralpalsy,oftenwithspinalfusionhardwareandproximalfemoralhardwarehippointcontracture,thedistalfemurthelateralpositioncanusedformeasurementBMDandfollowtherapy.Thepediatricnormativedatabaseforthistechniquevendorspecific[51TherelationshipBMDfracturechildrenclearlyestablished[26,48] examinationincludesimagestheareaswhereBMDmeasured.priorimages(eg,radiographs,CT,MRI)theseanatomicareasareavailable,theyshouldrevieweddeterminespecificsitesshouldbe analyzed using[54]Positioningandsofttissueequivalentdevicesissuedthemanufacturermustusedconsistentlyandproperly.Comfortdevices,suchpillowsundertheheadknees,mustinterferewithproperpositioningand mustneverappearthescanfield.Forthelumbarspine,vertebraemayexcludedtherescoredifferencemorethan1.0comparedtheadjacentvertebrae,therearefocalstructuralabnormalitiesoverlyingthevertebra,suchfractures,previoussurgery,degenerativechanges,otherinternalexternal,artifacts.Theremainingvertebrae(minimumtwolevels)areusedfordiagnosisandmonitoring.Diagnosticclassificationshouldmadeusingsinglevertebra.Fordiagnosispostmenopausalwomenandmenagedyearsandolder,measuredBMDvaluesmustcomparedwiththosetheadultreferencepopulationvalues,yieldingscorethatcorrespondsWHOdiagnosticcategory Fordiagnosischildren,premenopausalwomen,andmenyoungerthanyears,measuredBMDvaluesmustcomparedwithpopulationspecificagematchedvalues,yieldingscore[7]Typically,scoreslowerareconsideredto bebelowtheexpectedrangeforage.Fordiagnosischildrenandadolescents,measuredBMDvaluesmustcomparednormativepediatricdatabaseyieldinggenderspecificscore.ethnicityspecificdatabaseshouldbe usedavailableandadjustmentforheightwhenpossible.BMDvaluesandscoresfortotalbodylessheadregioninterestarecommonlyreported.Reportsshouldalsoincludemineralcontent(BMC)[55]Typically,scoresbeloware consideredabnormal.Whenmonitoringpatients,comparisonshouldmadepriorexaminationsthesameskeletalsite,regioninterest,andareasize.Theprecisionerrorandthespecificscanner(s)shouldascertaineddeterminemeasuredchangesare statisticallysignificant[7,56the priorexaminationwasperformedthesamedevice(notjustthesamemanufacturermodel),quantitativecomparisontheexaminationsperformed.theexaminationwasdifferentdevice,thencomparisonqualitativeunlesscrosscalibrationcalculationhasbeenperformed [41,60Comparabilityscans,in orderdecreasingvalidity,follows: PreviousexaminationsthesamewellmaintaineddevicePreviousexaminationsanotherdevicewithcrosscalibrationcalculationperformedPreviousexaminationsanotherdevicefromthe samemanufacturerPreviousexaminationsdevicefromanothermanufacturer(notrecommended) PRACTICE PARAMETER Vertebralfractureassessment(VFA)lowdoselateralimagethethoracicandlumbarspinethatmayadded to astandardDXAdeterminewhethervertebralfracturesare present[63,64]VFAshouldconsideredpatientswithheightlossbackpainwhohavebeenassessedconventionalradiographs,CT,MRI.VFAintendedsolelyidentifywhetherspinecompressionpresentanddoesreplaceconventionaldiagnosticimagingforotherpurposes.TrabecularBoneScore(TBS)methodobtainingquantitativedatatexturefromDXAspineimages.TBSrequiresspecializedsoftwarethatmeasuresrelativepixelamplitudevariationssummingthesquaredgrayleveldifferences[65]TBShasbeenshownimprovefractureriskpre

dictionusingtheFRAXtool.TBSadjustedfractureriskcalculationusingtheFRAXtoolespeciallyvaluablepatientswithtypediabetes,whofracturehigherBMDlevelsthannondiabetics[66]WhenassessingcompositionusingDXA,additionalfactorsshouldconsidere[22,28]Somepatientsmaytootalltoowideincludedthescannedfield.patientswhoaretootall,parttheheadexcluded,thepatientimagedwithbentknees.patientswhoaretoowide,halfthecan imaged,and theotherhalfbe estimatedbecauseof symmetry. Anythingthatalterswaterimpactmeasurements.Forinstance,overhydratedpatientmayresultdecreasedandincreasedScansobtainedsoonafterovernightfastingbeforethe patienthas consumedanythingallow formostreproduciblemeasurements.Whenassessingmusclemassmeasurements,suchtotalLM/height2,armslegs(ALM),ALM/totalweight,andALM/height2areusefuldetectingsarcopeniaandotherchronicconditionsthataffectAdipositymeasurements,includingVAT,subcutaneousadiposetissue,andindex(FM/height2),mayusedevaluatingpatientswithcancer,cachexia,andotherchronicconditionsthataffectanddistribution.DOCUMENTATIONReportingshoulddoneaccordancewiththe ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings [67] permanentrecord mustmaintained,and shouldinclude:Patientidentification,facilityidentification,examinationdate,imageorientation,andunitmanufacturerand modelClinicalnotesor patientquestionnairecontainingpertinenthistoryPositioning,anatomicalinformation,and/ortechniquesettingsneededforerformingserialmeasurementsPrintoutstheirelectronicequivalenttheimagesand regionsinterestprovidedthescannerForpostmenopausalwomenandmenagedyearsandolder,thereportsshouldincludetheBMDg/cm²),score,andclassificationaccordingWHOcriteria.Onediagnosticcategorynormal,osteopenia(lowbonemass),osteoporosisassignedpatientbasedthelowestscorethelumbarspine,totalhip,femoralneck,radius(radius33%,radius1/3).WHOclassificationis assignedonlyto the lowestscore,siteevaluated.OsteoporosisWHOcategoryfurtherdefinedmild,moderate,severe.Theonlyexceptioncombinationscoreconsistentwithosteoporosisandfragilityfracturethatdiagnosed“severeosteoporosis.”statementaboutfractureriskrecommended,appropriate.ThemostcommonlyusedmodelforcalculatingabsoluterisktheWHOFractureriskassessmenttool(FRAXtool).TheFRAXtoolprovidesyearriskhipfractureandglobalfracture(hip,spine,forearm,humerus),hasbeenFDAapprovedandmayappliedmen PRACTICE PARAMETER womenwhomeetcriteria[68]theUnitedStates,FRAXtypicallyreported patientsalreadyreceivingtheraforosteoporosis,patientswithknownvertebralhipfractures,patientsyoungerthanyears.OtherconsiderationsfortheuseFRAXareavailabletheInternationalSocietyforClinicalDensitometryOfficialPosition StatementFRAX[69]Forpremenopausalwomenand menyoungerthan 50 years,the BMD and scoreshouldbe reportedforskeletalsite examined.TheWHOclassificationdoesapplyto theseindividuals(exceptforwomenmenopausaltransition).scoresabove2.0areconsideredwithintheexpectedrangefortheirage.Individualswith scores2.0 andlowerareconsideredto havelowdensityfortheirage.Forchildrenandadolescents,scoresshouldreported.TheWHOclassificationdoesapply;theterms“osteopenia”and“osteoporosis”shouldusedwhenBMCarealBMDscoresarelessthanequal“Lowmineralmassmineral

density”thepreferredterminologyforpediatricDXAreports[70]Forallexaminations,thereportshouldindicatewhetherartifactsothertechnicalissuesmayhaveinfluencedthereportedmeasurementsBMD. statementcomparingthecurrentstudyprioravailablestudiesshouldincludestatementwhetheranychangesmeasuredBMDarestatisticallysignificant.Recommendationsfor,andthetimingof,followDXA scanmayalso be included.Whenappropriate,suggestionsforfurtherimaging(eg,radiography,CT,MRI)otherancillarytestsshouldbe provided.EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONSVariousequipmentdesignsthataccuratelyandreproduciblymeasureBMDusingareavailable.Theequipmentshouldprovidethefollowing:Normaladultandagematchedreferencepopulationvaluesmatchedforandapplicabletheequipmentbeingused.Somedevicesalsoprovidereferencevaluesmatchedforethnicityandbodyweight.Labeledimagestheanatomicsitemeasuredandmeasurementresults.Theseshouldrecordedpermanentlyforpatientrecords.Precisionerrorsmeasurementphantomstandardthatexceedthespecificationsrecommendationsthemanufacturerandarelessthan1%.vitro(phantom)precisionshouldequatedwithvivo(patient)precision,therolethetechnologistpatientpositioningandanalysiscritical.phantomotherstandardmustbe measuredaccordingto the manufacturer’srecommendationsordermonitorinstrumentcalibration. EQUIPMENT QUALITYCONTROLDXAequipmentqualitycontrolespecially importantformonitoringthe effectivenesstherapyprogressiondisease[41]EachDXA facilityshould havedocumentedpoliciesandproceduresforevaluatingtheeffectivemanagement,safety,andoperationDXAequipment.ThequalitycontrolprogramshoulddesignedconsultationwithQualifiedMedicalPhysicistminimizerisksforpatients,personnel,andthepublicandmaximizethequalitythediagnosticinformation.installationDXAunit,environmentalradiationsafetysurveyshouldconductedQualifiedMedicalPhysicist.Thesurveyshould includeanyadditionalevaluationrequiredstateregulations. PRACTICE PARAMETER Qualitycontrolproceduresshouldperformedandpermanentlyrecordedtrainedtechnologist.Theseproceduresaregenerallyrequiredleastdaysweekandalwaysbeforethefirstpatientmeasurementtheday.Theyshouldinterpretedimmediatelyuponcompletion,accordingtheguidelinesprovidedthemanufacturer,ensurepropersystemperformance.problemdetected,accordingmanufacturerguidelines,theservicerepresentativeshouldnotifiedandpatientsshouldbe examined untiltheequipmenthasbeenclearedforuse.EachfacilityshoulddetermineprecisionerrorandcalculateLSC.facilityhasmorethanDXAtechnologist,thesevaluesshouldrepresentan averagepooleddatafromalltechnologists.Uponreplacementthe DXA unit,precisionerrorandLSC shouldcrosscalibratedandrecalculated[71]RADIATION SAFETYIN IMAGINGRadiologists,medicalphysicists,registeredradiologistassistants,radiologictechnologists,andallsupervisingphysicianshaveresponsibilityforsafetytheworkplacekeepingradiationexposurestaff,andsocietywhole,“aslowreasonablyachievable”(ALARA)andassurethatradiationdosesindividualpatientsareappropriate,takingintoaccountthepossibleriskfromradiationexposureandthediagnosticimagequalitynecessaryachievetheclinicalobjective.Allpersonnelthatworkwithionizingradiationmustunderstandthekeyprinciplesoccupationalandpublicradiationprotection(justification,optimizationprotectionan

dapplicationdoselimits)andtheprinciplespropermanagementradiationdosepatients(justification,optimizationandtheusedosereferencelevels) http://wwwpub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1578_web57265295.pdf Nationallydevelopedguidelines,suchtheACR’sAppropriatenessCriteriashouldusedhelpchoosethemostappropriateimagingprocedurespreventunwarrantedradiationexposure.Facilitiesshouldhaveandadherepoliciesandproceduresthatrequirevaryingionizingradiationexaminationprotocols(plainradiography,fluoroscopy,interventionalradiology,CT)takeintoaccountpatienthabitus(suchpatientdimensions,weight,bodymassindex)optimizetherelationshipbetweenminimalradiationdoseandadequateimagequality.Automateddosereductiontechnologiesavailableimagingequipmentshouldbe usedwheneverappropriate.suchtechnologyis notavailable,appropriatemanualtechniquesshouldused.AdditionalinformationregardingpatientradiationsafetyimagingavailabletheImageGently®forchildrenwww.imagegently.organdImageWisely®foradultswww.imagewisely.org websites.Theseadvocacy andawarenesscampaignsprovidefreeeducationalmaterialsforallstakeholdersinvolvedimaging(patients,technologists,referringproviders,medicalphysicists,andradiologists). RadiationexposuresotherdoseindicesshouldmeasuredandpatientradiationdoseestimatedforrepresentativeexaminationsandtypespatientsQualifiedMedicalPhysicistaccordancewiththeapplicableACRtechnicalstandards.Regularauditingpatientdoseindicesshouldperformedcomparingthefacility’sdoseinformationwithnationalbenchmarks,suchtheDoseIndexRegistry,theNCRPReportNo.ReferenceLevelsandAchievableDosesMedicalandDentalImaging:RecommendationsfortheUnitedStatestheConferenceRadiationControlProgramDirector’sNationalEvaluationrayTrends.(ACR Resolutionadoptedin revisedin 2013, Resolution52).QUALITYCONTROL ANDIMPROVEMENT,SAFETY,INFECTION CONTROL,ANDPATIENT EDUCATIONPolicies and procedures related to quality, patient education, infection control, and safety should be developed and implemented in accordance with the ACR Policy on Quality Control and Improvement, Safety, Infection Control, and Patient Education appearing under the heading Position Statement on Quality ontrol& Improvement, Safety, Infection Controland Patient Education on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/ClinicalResources/PracticeParameters andTechnicalStandards ). PRACTICE PARAMETER Equipment performance monitoring should be in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and applicable aspects of the ACRAAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Radiographic Equipment [72] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThispracticeparameterwasrevisedaccordingtheprocessdescribedundertheheadingTheProcessforDevelopingACRPracticeGuidelinesandTechnicalStandardsthewebsite https://www.acr.org/Clinical Resources/PracticeParametersandTechnicalandards theCommitteeMusculoskeletalImagingthe CommissionBodyImaging,CommitteePracticeParametersGeneral,Small,Emergencyand/orRuralPracticetheCommissionGeneral,Small,Emergencyand/orRuralPractice,andtheCommitteePracticeParametersPediatricRadiologytheCommissionPediatricRadiologyin collaborationwiththe SPR andthe SSR. DanielWessell,MD,Ph.D Committee on Body Im

aging (Musculoskeletal) (ACR Committee responsible for sponsoring the draft through the process) William B. Morrison, MD, Chair Kambiz Motamedi, MD Dawn M. Hastreiter, MD, PhD Mary K. Jesse, MD Catherine C. Roberts, MD Kenneth S. Lee, MD David A. Rubin, MD, FACR Suzanne S. Long, MD Naveen Subhas, MD Jonathan S. Luchs, MD, FACR Committee on Practice Parameters – General, Small, Emergency and/or Rural Practices (ACR Committee responsible for sponsoring the draft through the process) Sayed Ali, MD, Chair Marco A. Amendola, MD, FACR Pil S. Kang, MD Gory Ballester, MD Jason B. Katzen, MD Lonnie J. Bargo, MD Serena McClam Liebengood, MD Christopher M. Brennan, MD, PhD Steven E. Liston, MD, MBA, FACR Resmi A. Charalel, MD Gagandeep S. Mangat, MD Charles E. Johnson, MD Tammam N. Nehme, MD Candice A. Johnstone, MD Jennifer L. Tomich, MD Padmaja A. Jonnalagadda, MD CollaborativeCommitteemembersrepresenttheirsocietiestheinitialandfinalrevisionthis practice parameter ACR SPR SSR Leon Lenchik, MD Marguerite T. Parisi, MD, MS Mary G. Hochman, MBA, MD Robert D. Boutin, MD Jeannette M Perez - Rossello, MD Tony T. Wong, MD Jonathan Flug, MD, MBA Richard E. A. Walker, MD Kevin B. Hoover, MD Sue C. Kaste, DO Robert J. Ward, MD PRACTICE PARAMETER Committee on Practice Parameters – Pediatric Radiology (ACR Committee responsible for sponsoring the draft through the process) Beverley Newman, MB, BCh, BSc, FACR, Chair Lorna P. Browne, MB, BCh Sue C. Kaste, DO Timothy J. Carmody, MD, FACR Tal Laor, MD Brian D. Coley, MD, FACR Terry L. Levin, MD Lee K. Collins, MD Marguerite T. Parisi, MD, MS Monica S. Epelman, MD Sumit Pruthi, MBBS Lynn Ansley Fordham, MD, FACR Nancy K. Rollins, MD Kerri A. Highmore, MD Pallavi Sagar, MD LincolnBerland,MND,FACR,Chair, CommissionBodyImagingRobertPyatt,Jr,MD,FACR,Chair, CommissionGeneral,Small,Emergencyand/orRuralPracticeartaHernanzSchulman,MD,FACR,Chair,CommissionPediatricRadiologyJacquelineAnneBello,MD,FACR,Chair, CommissionQualityand SafetyMatthew S.Pollack,MD,FACR,Chair, CommitteePracticeParametersTechnicalStandards Comments Reconciliation Committee Samir Patel, MD, FACR, Chair James L. McAnally, MD Johnson Lightfoote, MD, FACR, Co - Chair William B. Morrison, MD Sayed Ali, MD Beverley Newman, MB, BCh, BSc, FACR Jacqueline Anne Bello, MD, FACR Marguerite T. Parisi, MD, MS Lincoln L. Berland, MD, FACR Jeannette M. Pérez - Rosselló, MD Robert D. Boutin, MD Matthew S. Pollack, MD, FACR Richard Duszak, Jr., MD Robert S Pyatt Jr, MD, FACR Jonath

an Flug, MD, MBA Humberto G. Rosas Wolfgang Gowin, MD, PhD Sandra Rutigliano, MD Marta Hernanz - Schulman, MD, FACR Timothy L. Swan, MD, FACR, FSIR Mary G. Hochman, MBA, MD Michael J. Ulissey, MD, FACR Kevin B. Hoover, MD Robert J. Ward, MD Sue C. Kaste, DO Richard E. A. Walker, MD Paul A. Larson, MD, FACR Roland Wong, ScM Leon Lenchik, MD REFERENCESGowin W, Felsenberg, D,. Acronyms in osteodensitometry. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry1998;1:137Brown JP, Josse RG, Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of C.2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2002;167:S1Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, et al. Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization TaskForce for Osteoporosis. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the U1999;10:259Kanis JA, Gluer CC. An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2000;11:192202.Link TM, Lang TF. Axial QCT: clinical applications and new developments. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2014;17:438Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance evaluation of a dualenergy xray bone densitometer. Calcified tissue international1989;44:228Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S. Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Societyfor Clinical Densitometry2013;16:455 PRACTICE PARAMETER Adams JE. Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol2013;9:2842.Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM. Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association2002;288:188997.Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J. Dualenergy xray absorptiometry for totalbody and regional bonemineral and softtissue composition. The American journal of clinical nutrition1990;51:1106WattsNB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dualenergy Xray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2004;15:847Wells JC, Haroun D, Williams JE, et al. Evaluation of DXA against the fourcomponent model of body composition in obese children and adolescents aged 521 years. Int J Obes (L

ond)2010;34:649Miller PD, Bonnick SL, Rosen CJ. Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population. Calcified tissue international1996;58:207Briot K, Roux C. Glucocorticoidinduced osteoporosis. RMD Open2015;1:e000014.Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of GlucocorticoidInduced Osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2017;69:1095110.Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, et al. Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dualenergy xray absorptiometry. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association2001;286:57Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014;25:2359Gluer CC. 30years of DXA technology innovations. Bone2017;104:712.Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet2002;359:192936.Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA1997;7:390406.Kling JM, Clarke BL, Sandhu NP. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review. J Womens Health (Larchmt)2014;23:56372.Shepherd JA, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Heymsfield SB. Body composition by DXA. Bone2017;104:10105.Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2010;16 Suppl 3:137.Andersen BN, Johansen PB, Abrahamsen B. Proton pump inhibitors and osteoporosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol2016;28:420Bonnick SL, Shulman L. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both? The American journal of medicine2006;119:S25Bachrach LK, Gordon CM, Section On E. Bone Densitometry in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics2016;138.Messina C, Monaco CG, Ulivieri FM, Sardanelli F, Sconfienza LM. Dualenergy Xray absorptiometry body composition in patients with secondary osteoporosis. Eur J Radiol2016;85:1493Petak S, Barbu CG, Yu EW, et al. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: body composition analysis reporting. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2013;16:50819.Wong WW, Hergenroeder AC, Stuff JE, Butte NF, Smith EO, Ellis KJ. Evaluating body fat in girls and female adolescents: advantages and disadvantages of dualenergy Xray absorptiometry. The American journal of clinical nutrition2002;76:384Br

inkley M, BroyS, Lieb E, Petak S, Tanner B. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Clinician Course Syllabus, version 10.2. 2010.Van Loan MD, Johnson HL, Barbieri TF. Effect of weight loss on bone mineral content and bone mineral density in obese women. The American journal of clinical nutrition1998;67:734Weigert JM, Cann CE. Dual energy xray absorptiometry (DXA) in obese patient: are normal values really normal? Journal of Women's Imaging1999;1:11Yu DS, Lee DT. Do medically unexplained somatic symptoms predict depression in older Chinese? Int J Geriatr Psychaitry2012;27:11926.American College of Radiology. ACRSPR practice parameter for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant PRACTICE PARAMETER adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. Available at: https://www.acr.org//media/ACR/Files/Practice Parameters/PregnantPts.pdf . Accessed May 18, 2018. American College of Radiology. ACRAAPMSIIMpractice parameter for digital radiography. Available at: https://www.acr.org//media/ACR/Files/PracticeParameters/RadDigital.pdf . Accessed August 15, 2022. merican College of Radiology. ACRAAPM technical standard for diagnostic medical physics performance monitoring of dualenergy xray absorptiometry (DXA) equipment. Available at: https://www.acr.org/ /media/ACR/Files/PracticeParameters/DXAEquipmentStandard.pdf . Accessed December 16, 2020. Hawkinson J, Timins J, Angelo D, Shaw M, Takata R, Harshaw F. Technical white paper: bone densitometry. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2007;4:320Lenchik L, Rochmis P, Sartoris DJ. Optimized interpretation and reporting of dual Xray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. AJR. American journal of roentgenology1998;171:150920.Siminoski K, O'Keeffe M, Brown JP, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting. Can Assoc Radiol J2013;64:281American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for continuing medical education (CME) Available at: https://www.acr.org//media/ACR/Files/PracticeParameters/CME.pdf . Accessed May 18, 2018. Kim HS, Yang SO. Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test ofRadiotechnologists. J Bone Metab2014;21:2Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet1993;341:72Franck H, Munz M, Scherrer M. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy XRay absorptiometry in singlebeam and fanbeam design. Calcified tissue international1997;61:445Lai K, Rencken M, Drinkwater BL, Chesnut CH, 3rd. Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision. Calcified tissue international1993;53:225Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C. Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? Calcified tissue international1993;52:344Rand T, Seidl G, Kainberger F, et al. Impact of spinal degenerative changes on the evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy Xray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcified tissue international1997;60:430Bachrach LK. Osteoporosis and measurement of bone mass in children and adolescents.

Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America2005;34:52135, vii.Binkovitz LA, Henwood MJ. Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation. Pediatric radiology2007;37:2131.Henderson RC, Lark RK, Newman JE, et al. Pediatric reference data for dual Xray absorptiometric measures of normal bone density in the distal femur. AJR. American journal of roentgenology2002;178:439Southard RN, Morris JD, Mahan JD, et al. Bone mass in healthy children: measurement with quantitative DXA. Radiology1991;179:735Grissom LE, Kecskemethy HH, Bachrach SJ, McKay C, Harcke HT. Bone densitometry in pediatric patients treated with pamidronate. Pediatric radiology2005;35:511Harcke HT, Taylor A, Bachrach S, Miller F, Henderson RC. Lateral femoral scan: an alternative method for assessing bone mineral density in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric radiology1998;28:241Henderson R, Berglund LM, May R. The relationship between fractures and DXA measures of BMD in the distal femur of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research0;25:52026.Jaovisidha S, Sartoris DJ, Martin EM, De Maeseneer M, Szollar SM, Deftos LJ. Influence of spondylopathy on bone densitometry using dual energy Xray absorptiometry. Calcified tissue international1997;60:424Salle BL, Braillon P, Glorieux FH, Brunet J, Cavero E, Meunier PJ. Lumbar bone mineral content measured by dual energy Xray absorptiometry in newborns and infants. Acta Paediatr1992;81:953Baim S, Wilson CR, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, Downs RW, Jr., Lentle BC. Precision assessment and radiation safety for dualenergy Xray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2005;8:371Bonnick SL, Johnston CC, Jr., Kleerekoper M, et al. Importance of precision in bone density measurements. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2001;4:10510.Carey JJ, Delaney MF. Utility of DXA for monitoring, technical aspects of DXA BMD measurement and precision testing. Bone2017;104:44Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as PRACTICE PARAMETER result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA1995;5:26270.Genant HK. Universal standardization for dual Xray absorptiometry: patient and phantom crosscalibration results. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research1995;10:997Genant HK, GramppS, Gluer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual xray absorptiometry: patient and phantom crosscalibration results. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research1994;9:1503Pocock NA, Noakes KA, Griffiths M, et

al. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research1997;12:2113Ferrar L, Jiang G, Barrington NA, Eastell R. Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric Xray absorptiometry. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2000;15:57585.Zeytinoglu M, Jain RK, Vokes TJ. Vertebral fracture assessment: Enhancing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. Bone2017;104:54Martineau P, Leslie WD. Trabecular bone score (TBS): Method and applications. Bone2017;104:66Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal I, Ward RJ, Roberts CC, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Osteoporosiand Bone Mineral Density. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2017;14:S189S202.American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. Available at: https://www.acr.org//media/ACR/Files/PracticeParameters/CommunicationDiag.pdf . Accessed July 21, 2017. World Health Organization. Welcome to FRAX®. Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ . Accessed July 21, 2017. Hans DB, Kanis JA, Baim S, et al. Joint Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX((R)). Executive Summary of the 2010 Position Development Conference on Interpretation and use of FRAX(R) in clinical practice. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2011;14:17180.Crabtree NJ, Arabi A, Bachrach LK, et al. Dualenergy Xray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2014;17:225Shepherd JA, Lu Y, Wilson K, et al. Crosscalibration and minimum precision standards for dualenergy Xray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2006;9:31American College of Radiology. ACRAAPM technical standard for diagnostic medical physics performance monitoring of radiographic equipment. Available at: https://www.acr.org//media/ACR/Files/Practice Parameters/RadEquip.pdf . Accessed January 11, 2017. *Practice parameters and technical standards are published annually with an effective date of October 1 in the yearin whichamended,revised,approvedby theCouncil.Forpracticeparametersand technicalstandardspublishedbeforetheeffectivedatewasJanuaryfollowingtheyearwhichthepracticeparametertechnicalstandard wasamended,revised,approvedthe ACR Council. DevelopmentChronologyfor thisPracticeParameter 1998 (Resolution Revised(ResolutionAmended(Resolution17, 34, Revised(ResolutionAmended(ResolutionRevised(ResolutionAmended(ResolutionRevised(Re