/
University of California Davis University of California Davis

University of California Davis - PDF document

susan
susan . @susan
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2021-08-22

University of California Davis - PPT Presentation

Matthew FarrensWETI CrossCutting Tools2Began by looking at optical for offchip communicationLogical place to startBecame intrigued by onchip possibilities for opticalMulticoreswill require high ban ID: 868845

modeling optical chip model optical modeling model chip electrical power interconnect thermals thermal high equalized resonators technologies sensitive important

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "University of California Davis" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Matthew Farrens University of Califor
Matthew Farrens University of California, Davis WETI Cross - Cutting Tools 2 • Began by looking at optical for off - chip communication – Logical place to start • Became intrigued by on - chip possibilities for optical – Multicores will

2 require high bandwidth interconnect â€
require high bandwidth interconnect – Electrical unlikely to scale well • Latency, power consumption issues Origins 3 • Optical networks have many upsides – High switching speeds – Energy efficiencies in 10’s of fJ /bit • Also, u

3 nique capabilities – Waveguides can
nique capabilities – Waveguides can intersect – High signal density (128 / waveguide, for example) Optics 4 • Many interesting papers in literature • Focus on basic building blocks – Waveguides, resonators, etc • Proposed designs us

4 ed large number of resonators – Hund
ed large number of resonators – Hundreds to millions – Treated as black boxes • Primarily implemented existing ideas using Optics Optical On - chip Networks 5 • Thermals important when devices sensitive to heat – Resonators drift .09nm

5 /C • Pumping many watts of power int
/C • Pumping many watts of power into chip • Is proposed network actually even thermally stable? Nothing on Thermals 6 • No tools existed to answer that question – So we built one • Well, Chris Nitta built one, anyway. Thermally Stable?

6 7 • Tool to model network power c
7 • Tool to model network power consumption • Based on Orion, CACTI – Updated and added optical modeling • Calls Hotspot to calculate temperatures • Written to be called as library like Hotspot Mintaka 8 • Validated to the best o

7 f our ability • Nothing to compare i
f our ability • Nothing to compare it to directly • Checked what we could – Compared Electrical calculations to CACTI – Compared optical numbers to published values Mintaka 9 • Model existing systems in much greater detail • Discover

8 unexpected behavior – Trimming not f
unexpected behavior – Trimming not fixed cost – Power can be absent when needed with photonic tokens • Identify interesting new challenges – Last Mile • Explore unique capabilities of Optical Interconnects – Directly Connected Optical Fab

9 ric Using Mintaka We Could 16x16
ric Using Mintaka We Could 16x16 Arbitration - Free Directly Connected Optical Fabric C. Nitta, M. Farrens , V Akella DCAF – Directly Connected Arbitration Free Photonic Crossbar for Energy - Efficient High Performance Computing , IPDPS, Shang

10 hai, May 2012 (To appear) 11 • Low
hai, May 2012 (To appear) 11 • Low - level simulations important to provide parameters • System - level modeling very important as well – Modeling small number of devices not enough Lessons Learned 12 • Need for universally agreed - upon se

11 t of values • Ideally, 3 numbers for
t of values • Ideally, 3 numbers for each parameter – Theoretical Min/Max – Experimentally demonstrated – Agreed - up/consensus number Lessons Learned 13 • Importance of thermal modeling – Particularly for technologies that are sensit

12 ive to thermals – Even electronics a
ive to thermals – Even electronics are now sensitive because of leakage Lessons Learned 14 • Better thermal modeling of ambient temperature – Need better models of amount of heat that can be moved – Thermals should be integrated with po

13 wer calculations • not separate call
wer calculations • not separate call • Need equalized /electrical interconnect models – How to accurately estimate electrical interconnect cost? – No available models for equalized electrical interconnects • Equalized on - chip interconnect t

14 oolbox Things we need 15 • Need
oolbox Things we need 15 • Need tools to model resilience – Newer, immature technologies prone to more errors • Need to model failures for new technology – Will require techniques to provide reliability • Need ways to model the effective

15 ness of techniques • Need a “Wikiâ
ness of techniques • Need a “Wiki” • Where community can contribute and create universal parameters Things we need 16 • Not looking at entire system can lead to problems – Thermal modeling often not done because it’s complicated •

16 Ignore thermal modeling at your own peri
Ignore thermal modeling at your own peril! • Not including adequate information leads to problems – Traces need dependency information, for example • Need to look at interfaces between technologies also – Last mile problem • GIGO Conclusi