/
Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage

Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
419 views
Uploaded On 2015-12-05

Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage - PPT Presentation

Nick Fox University of Sheffield UK Pam Alldred Brunel University UK Introduction Rationale for the paper Anthropocentrism and sexuality Antihumanism and sexuality Study of young mens sexuality ID: 215515

bodies sexuality anti assemblage sexuality bodies assemblage anti produce hetero affect human affects capacities social young sexual desires men

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage

Nick Fox, University of Sheffield, UK Pam Alldred, Brunel University, UK Slide2

Introduction Rationale for the paper.

Anthropocentrism and sexuality.Anti-humanism and sexuality.Study of young men’s sexuality.The hetero-masculinity assemblage.Slide3

Rationale for the paper

Two theoretical moves are required to resist ‘humanist enticements’ (e.g. individualism, free will, identity) associated with sexuality. Post-structuralism has shown how sexual knowledgeabilities are culturally-specific.

Anti-humanist turn sees sexual bodies and desires as products of an impersonal and nomadic sexuality that flows between bodies, things, ideas and social formations.Slide4

AnthropocentrismGives priority to human bodies, human subjects and human experience.

Reflected in:HumanismRomanticismIndividualism

Identity politicsSlide5

Sexuality and anthropocentrism

Anthropocentric accounts :‘... classify sexual desires according to a very limited number of formulaic syntheses of genders and sexes: there is the norm (heterosexuality), then an inversion of the norm turned into an exclusive disjunction from the norm (homosexuality), then a perversion of the norm in a whole range of in-betweens (bisexuality and, to a much lesser degree, transsexuality

).’

(

Lambevski

2004: 306).Slide6

Anti-humanist approaches

Human bodies and subjects are no longer privileged as agents.Focuses instead on assemblages of bodies, things, ideas, social institutions.Elements within assemblages affect and

are affected by

each other.

These

flows of affect

produce

capacities

in bodies,

collectivities

and things.Slide7

Anti-humanism and sexuality

Sexuality is an impersonal, nomadic flow of affect within assemblages of bodies, things, ideas and social institutions and formations.This flow produces sexual (and other) capacities to desire in bodies, and hence manifestations of sexuality.Sexuality is consequently both infinitely variable and typically highly constrained (by capitalism, patriarchy, heteronormativity, genitality

,etc. ).Slide8

From ontology to methodology

Use social methods that:Explore the flows of affect in sexuality-assemblages.Identify the forces that produce conventional sexualities.Assess how to resist these forces.Slide9

The sexuality of young men

Alldred & David’s study (2007) of young people’s views of sex education and teenage pregnancy.

Focus group with eight white, working-class young men in ‘alternative education’ provision; history of multiple exclusions and tales of victimisation by teachers.

Context: English town in industrial decline; viewed as teenage pregnancy ‘hotspot’.Slide10

Data analysis methodology

Noisy and riotous engagement, with constant overlapping and interrupting.Approach the focus groups as ethnography (‘writing culture’) rather than interviews. No attempt to make claims of ‘authenticity’ or ‘identity’ by recourse to quotations from the transcript.Slide11

1. Sexuality produced relationally

Boastful heterosexualised

masculinities (initially understood as flirtation) is the product of status hierarchical affects.

This reflects location within a broader assemblage of hetero-patriarchal, economic and educational affects.

These produce both ‘manual workers’ and

a hetero-

masculinist

sexuality.Slide12

2. Sexuality as capacity

The analysis sees the hetero-masculinity of these young men not as a fixed attribute, but as fleeting opportunities that produce actions and desires in different contexts.These multiple capacities to

affect and be affected emerge from the assemblage of bodies, things and social formations.

Contrasts with

Bourdieu

‘s ‘cultural

capital‘ , in which capital is owned (or lacked) by bodies.Slide13

Sexuality as contingent and variable capacities

The physical aggression in this group is a reflection of the competitive affects within the assemblage (e.g. competition for jobs or particular girlfriends,).Capacities can variously produce hetero-sexuality; male-male aggression;

homosocial

or homosexual intimacies (and potential for other actions and desires)

.Slide14

The hetero-masculinity assemblage

boys - school exclusion - education system - alternative education – jobless men - local community norms – teenage pregnancy – benefits - mechanic’s apprenticeship – cars –driving – adult status – cigarettes – take-away food – bodily maturation – height – sexual desire – virginity –’girls’ – ‘being up-for-it’ – erections – peer discourse on heterosexSlide15

Some conclusionsSexuality is a flow of affect within an assemblage of human and non-human.

There are myriad possible sexualities.Capitalism, patriarchy, commodification and genitalism produce narrow sexualities.

There is potential to resist, and explore

nomadic sexuality.Slide16

Anti-humanism, affects and the sexuality-assemblage

Nick Fox, University of Sheffield Pam Alldred, Brunel University