/
Dissolution Technologies  MAY  In Vitro Release of Nicotine From Chewing Gum Formulations Dissolution Technologies  MAY  In Vitro Release of Nicotine From Chewing Gum Formulations

Dissolution Technologies MAY In Vitro Release of Nicotine From Chewing Gum Formulations - PDF document

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
474 views
Uploaded On 2015-03-04

Dissolution Technologies MAY In Vitro Release of Nicotine From Chewing Gum Formulations - PPT Presentation

acuk Introduction n addition to its confectionery rolechewing gum also has a proven value as a delivery vehicle for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients 1 It can be taken discreetly without water and allows for local and systemic delivery It ID: 41317

acuk Introduction addition

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Dissolution Technologies MAY In Vitro ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Technologies In Vitro Release of Nicotine From Chewing Gum FormulationsYamini Morjaria,William J Irwin,Paul X Barnett,Rick S Chan,andBarbara R Conway Email:conway@aston.ac.uk Introductionn addition to its confectionery role,chewing gumalso has a proven value as a delivery vehicle forpharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients (1).It can be taken discreetly without water and allowsfor local and systemic delivery.It can be employed fortreatment of diseases of the oral cavity and throat,e.g.for caries prevention,or it can release drugs thatcan be absorbed through oral mucosa directly into AbstractRelease of nicotine from conventional gums and from gums made using a directly compressible gumbase was studied using the European Pharmacopoeia apparatus for testing of medicated chewing gums.It was found that gum base and the method of preparation used in a formulation were important factorswhen controlling the release of drugs from chewing gum. Medicines Research Unit,Aston University,Birmingham,UK,Glaxo SmithKline Consumer Healthcare,St.Georges Avenue,Weybridge,UKGlaxo SmithKline Consumer Healthcare,1500 Littleton Rd,Parsippany,New Jersey,USACorresponding author Technologies Pharmagum¨ S consists primarily of gum base and sor-bitol.Pharmagum¨ M contains gum base,Mannitol andIsomalt (www.spipharma.com).The powder mix was com-pressed using a Manesty single-punch tablet machine.Nicorette¨ chewing gum (4 mg,batch/lot BH559A) waspurchased and used as supplied.The chewing machine consists of a temperature-con-trolled chewing chamber in which the gum piece ischewed by two electronically-controlled horizontal pistonsdriven by compressed air (Figure 1).The two pistons trans-mit twisting and pressing forces to the gum,while a thirdvertical piston,(ÒtongueÓ) operates alternately to the twohorizontal pistons to ensure that the gum stays in theappropriate position.The temperature of the chamber canbe maintained at 37±0.5¡C and the chew rate can be var-ied.Other adjustable settings include the volume of themedium,the distance between the jaws and the twistingmovement.The European Pharmacopoeia recommendsusing 20 ml of unspecified buffer (with a pH close to 6) in achewing chamber of 40 ml and a chew rate of 60 strokesper minute.The gums were placed in the chewing chamber with 40ml of artificial saliva,see Table 2 (6).The temperature of thechewing chamber was set to 37C with a chew rate of 60chews/minute.The machine was run without chewinggum for the first two minutes,and then the buffer removedto ensure that any residues from the extensive washingand cleaning procedure were removed and to allow equili-bration of chew rate and temperature.Release from thegum samples was then studied.Two-mL samples weretaken at 0,5,10,15,20,25 and 30 minutes and replacedwith equal amounts of fresh artificial saliva.The sampleswere then immediately filtered though a 0.45 m filter andthe nicotine levels determined using reversed-phase HPLC.A Waters Xterra RP-18 4.6 x150mm column was employedand the mobile phase consisted of 70% ammonium phos-phate buffer (pH 8.5):30% acetonitrile.The injection vol-ume was 20 µL,flow rate was 1 mL/minute and nicotinewas detected at a wavelength of 260 nm.These conditionsresulted in a retention time of 3.4 minutes.A CNS Farnell QTS 25 texture analyzer was used tostudy the texture of the gums.A 2 mm stainless steelprobe was used to penetrate the gums at 30 mm/min to adepth of 3 mm.The load that encountered the probe wasthen plotted against time.The dissolution curves for the release of nicotine(Figure 2) from the compressible formulations are similar=82.4).Pharmagum¨ M and Pharmagum¨ S showed afaster release rate compared to the conventional gum=36.6).An explanation for this can be proposed byexamining the texture of the gums.Pharmagum¨ M and Pharmagum¨ S gums are similarto a tablet in appearance.Since Pharmagum¨ M has 50 %more gum base compared to Pharmagum¨ S (www.spipharma.com),this should provide a more pleasantmouth feel and it was expected that this would result in aslower release of drug.However,this was not the casebecause both formulations crumbled when placed in the Ingredient Pharmagum¨ (S/M) 84.8 Nicotine Polacrilex 2.2 Magnesium Stearate 2.0 Sorbitol Sodium Carbonate 3.0 Table 1.Directly compressible nicotine gum formula- Table 2.Artificial Saliva Formulation Components Quantity (mmol L 2 KHCO NaCl MgCl CaCl Citric Acid 0.15 pH adjusted to 6.7 with NaOH or HCl Figure 1.Schematic diagram of the chewing chamber of In vitroapparatus used Technologies chewing machine.For patient acceptability,and in orderto provide a controlled release of nicotine,the gumshould remain intact during the chewing process.Thetexture of the gums under pressure (mimicking chewingaction) can be studied using a texture analyzer.Nicotine was released in a controlled manner from theconventional gum formulation (Figure 2).In vitronicotinerelease from conventional gums has been shown to becomparable to reported chew-out studies (7).The gumwas soft and remained intact when chewed in the chew-ing apparatus.As the texture analyzer probe penetrated the conven-tional gum,a small constant force was needed to reachthe desired depth.Once the desired depth was reached,on withdrawal a negative peak was observed,showingthe adhesiveness of the gum (Figure 3).The gums formedusing the compressible formulations are hard and crum-ble when pressure is applied (Figure 4).The peak heightindicates the initial biting resistance or gum firmness,while the downward peak is related to tack or adhesionof the gum (1).Pharmagum¨ S,(mean hardness 21,783 g),Pharmagum¨ M (mean hardness 21,222 g) are more thanten times the hardness of the conventional gums (meanhardness 1,684 g).As the probe penetrated thePharmagum¨ S and M formulations,the gums crumbledlike a tablet,hence,the sharp drop in the curve after 2and 3 seconds respectively.This phenomenon was alsoobserved in the chewing chamber of the chewing appa-ratus.The gum initially crumbles and then comes togeth-er to form a gum.The crumbling of the gum allows thenicotine to be released and provides a faster release ratecompared to the conventional gums,which remain intactduring the process.A possible explanation for the crum-bling could be due to the formulation method of thegums.The gum particles are surrounded by various pow-dered excipients and are unable to flow together.Whenpressure is applied,the gum crumbles into the originalparticles.On wetting by saliva,the soluble excipientswould wash away allowing the wetted gum particles toflow together.ConclusionNicotine release from chewing gum formulations canbe studied using the EP apparatus.The apparatus can beused as a quality control dissolution test and will provevaluable in the development of new chewing gum formu-lations.References1.WW Lee,ÒChewing gum as a delivery vehicle for phar-maceutical and nutraceutical substancesÓ.Pharm TechOn-line,2:1-11,2001.2.LL Christrup and N M¿eller,ÒChewing gum as a drugdelivery systemÓArch Pharm Chem,Sci Ed,14:30-36,3.JN Rider,ELBrunson,WG Chambliss,RW Cleary,AHHikal,PH Rider,LA Walker,CM Wyandt and AB Jones,ÒDevelopment and evaluation of a novel dissolutionapparatus for medicated chewing gum productsÓPharm Res,9:255-260,1992.4.C Kvist,S-B Andersson,S Fors,B Wennergren and JBerglund,ÒApparatus for studying in vitrorelease from Figure 2.In vitrorelease of nicotine from compressible gum formulationsand a commercial gum (Nicorette¨ 4mg) using the EuropeanPharmacopoeia chewing gum apparatus. Figure 3.Texture profile of Nicorette¨ gum at 27¡C.(Each line indicates each gumsample analyzed and three samples were analyzed per formulation). Figure 4.Texture profile of Pharmagum¨ M and Pharmagum¨ S at 27¡C.(Each line indicates each gum sample analyzed and three samples were ana- Technologies medicated chewing gumsÓ.Int J Pharm,189:57-65,5.European Pharmacopoeia 4Edition-2002,GeneralChapter 2.9.25,ÒChewing gum,Medicated,DrugRelease FromÓ,pp 227-228,Directorate for the Qualityof Medicines of the Council of Europe,Strasbourg,6.S Parker,D Martin and M Braden,ÒSoft acrylic resinmaterials containing a polymerisable plasticiser II:Water absorption characteristicsÓ.Biomaterials,20:55-60,1999.7.Y Mistry,WJ Irwin,BR Conway,PBarnett,T Grattanand RS Chan,Òrelease of nicotine from com-mercially available nicotine gums using the EuropeanPharmacopoeia apparatusÓ.J Pharm Pharmacol53S:197,2001.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the BBSRC andGlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare.We are grateful toSPI Pharma for supplying the samples of Pharmagum