/
Review Worksheet Review Worksheet

Review Worksheet - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
369 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-10

Review Worksheet - PPT Presentation

Solutions 1 Describe the focus of comparative planetology and discuss its importance to solar system studies Comparative planetology is the approach we use to study and understand our solar system ID: 546780

formed planets solar comets planets formed comets solar jovian asteroids system earth surface moon nebula planetisimals terrestrial materials explain

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Review Worksheet" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Review Worksheet

SolutionsSlide2

1. Describe

the focus of comparative

planetology and discuss its importance to solar system studies.

Comparative

planetology

is

the approach we use to study and understand our solar system

. It

involves

comparing the worlds

of our system, including planets, moons, asteroids, and comets, to one another. Its basic premise is that the s

imilarities and differences

among the worlds can be traced to

common physical processes. Slide3

2. Briefly

outline the theory or hypothesis which best explains the origin of the solar system and explain how the observable properties of the solar system are related to its process of formation.

A large nebula began to collapse gravitationally. As it did so, it began to spin faster

, and

flattened

into a disk and heated up. Planetisimals were formed by accretion of small particles that collided & stuck together growing larger. Slide4

The

greater gravity

of planetisimals attracted more materials and they grew larger, forming planets. Leftover debris became asteroids and comets.Slide5

All the orbital and rotational motions can be explained as preserving the original rotation of the nebula from which the solar system formed.

Accretion

explains planetary isolation. Temperature differences explain differentiation.

Irregularities

can be explained by collisions during the

planetisimal eraSlide6

3. Compare

and contrast the formation of Jovian planets to that of terrestrial planets.

The terrestrial planets are composed primarily of denser materials that condensed in the hotter part of the solar nebula.

The

Jovian planets contain not only the metallic and rocky compounds but also the hydrogen compounds which condensed in the colder part of the nebula, outside the frost

line.Since these materials made up a larger percentage of the nebula, these planetisimals were able to accrete more material.

This

allowed their greater gravity to attract the lighter hydrogen and helium gas. As a result, the Jovian planets have thick atmospheres. Slide7

4. In

the context of planet formation, what are asteroids and comets? Briefly explain why we find asteroids in the asteroid belt and comets in the

Kuiper belt and Oort

cloud.

Asteroids and comets are the leftover

planetisimals that never accreted enough material to form planets. Asteroids

formed inside the

frostline

, comets formed outside the frost line. The asteroids are kept in the asteroid belt by the gravitational influence of Jupiter. Slide8

Comets that formed beyond the orbit of Neptune orbit in the

Kuiper

belt. Comets that formed where the Jovian planets are were flung into extreme orbits by Jupiter and the other large Jovian planets.Slide9

5.

Summarize the basic differences between the terrestrial and the Jovian planets.

Terrestrial planets are metallic or rocky in composition, close to the Sun, are warmer at the surface, have higher average density, have a solid surface, and have few if any moons.

 

Jovian planets are gaseous in composition, lower in density, have no solid surface, are farther from the Sun, and have rings and moonsSlide10

6.

Describe and distinguish between space missions and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.

flyby- lowest cost, easiest type of mission however, can’t do sustained studies, try to capture images/data on the fly

Orbiter- costs more & takes more planning but allows for long term studies

Lander – more costly & more planning, also requires extra fuel for descent to surface, more danger of damage but gives high res images of surface and can study samples. Can collect info on surface comp, temp, pressure, etc.

Sample return- most expensive, heaviest load.Slide11

7. Describe

how the moon formed and the evidence to support this hypothesis.

The Moon formed from a giant impact of a Mars-size

object with the earth. This impact

destroyed

the body and blasted material from the Earth’s mantle into orbit. This material eventually coalesced to form the Moon.  Slide12

Three pieces of evidence are:

the composition of the Moon is similar to that of the earth’s outer layers,

the Moon is depleted of easily vaporized materials, as we would expect from the heat of an impact computer simulations show that the Moon could really have formed this waySlide13

8.

Explain why the early Earth did not form with water, and how it gained it later in its formation.

Earth, and all terrestrial planets, formed inside the frost line

from rocky and metallic

planetisimals

. The temperature of the solar nebula was too hot for water ice to exist and the earth was too small to hold onto a substantial atmosphere of hot gases. Earth gained its water later during the heavy bombardment

phase.

Water-rich

planetisimals

(or comets

) that formed beyond the frost line were scattered into the inner solar system, predominantly through gravitational encounters with Jupiter, and impacted the earth.Slide14

9.

If a fossil is found to contain a sixteenth as much Carbon-14 as a living organism, what is the percent of Carbon-14 remaining? If the half life of Carbon-14 is 5, 715 years

, how old is the fossil?

1/16

= (½ )

4 so four half lives have gone by this means the fossil is about

5715 x 4 = 22,860 years old

the

percent remaining is (1/16) x 100 = 6.25 %