/
Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus

Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
438 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-15

Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus - PPT Presentation

Study Final Report and Next Steps 0 1 FTA Section 5311f Rural Intercity Program Nonurbanized services under 50000 population Intercity service is defined in the FTA guidance Federal S5311f shares same as for S 5311 ID: 320393

5311 intercity section service intercity 5311 service section fta match bus operating rural kind map consultation program requirements areas

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study: Final Report and Next Steps

0Slide2

1

FTA Section 5311(f): Rural Intercity Program

Non-urbanized services- under 50,000 populationIntercity service is defined in the FTA guidanceFederal S.5311(f) shares same as for S. 5311New federal consultation requirements require involvement of intercity operators

Section 5311 is administered

by

Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Slide3

FTA Section 5311(f) Definition of Intercity Service

Regularly scheduled bus service

General PublicOperates with limited stops between two or more urban areas not in close proximityNot commuter service Fixed-route, capable of carrying baggageMeaningful connection with national intercity bus network

2Slide4

3

Meaningful Connection

To National Network of Intercity Bus ServiceService to physical locations where connections can be made (stations or stops)Scheduled to facilitate connection with intercity bus serviceInformation to make connection—schedules, stop locationsInterline ticketing not required by FTA, but Greyhound and other firms (members of the National Bus Traffic Association) are supportiveSlide5

Eligible Uses of S.5311(f) Funds

Operating Assistance (generally 50/50 match on net deficit):Funding of net deficit on a particular route or service

Funding for all intercity routes to support the networkPurchase-of-service/demonstration projectsUser-side subsidiesCapital Assistance (generally 80/20):VehiclesShelters, stops, signage

Intermodal facilities (related to rural usage)

Computers/communications equipment (ticketing)

ADA accessibility equipment

Planning and Marketing

Studies

Marketing Plans, materials, campaigns

Information systems

4Slide6

Section 5311(f) Funding

15 percent set-aside of a state’s S.5311 rural transit apportionment

Unless a state certifies that it has no unmet intercity needs, and has conducted a consultation process with intercity operatorsVirginia amounts:2012: $1,871,639 (15% of $12,477,596)2013: $2,180,234 (15% of $14,534,896)2014: $2,247,062 (15% of $14,980,414)Virginia has previously certified no unmet needs and utilized the funding as part of the general Section 5311 program

5Slide7

Recent

Developments in the Section 5311(f) Program :

Federal Transit Administration oversight of requirements in SAFETEA-LU calling for a consultation process before certifying that there are no unmet rural intercity needs

Opportunity to use “in-kind” operating match (now included in MAP-21 reauthorization) potentially eliminates need to provide local/state/carrier cash match for operating assistance

Increases in overall Section 5311 allocations under SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21 (?)

6Slide8

In-Kind Match:

Only available for Section 5311(f) operating assistance

Previously an FTA administrative pilot project, now included in MAP-21 statutory languageNow used in many states: Washington, Oregon, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Missouri, Alabama, Ohio, Maryland, New Hampshire, Michigan, etc. Uses the value of connecting unsubsidized service as in-kind match for operating assistanceAs pilot project allowed 50 percent of fully-allocated cost of unsubsidized connecting serviceMAP-21 language has no percentage language, awaiting FTA draft circular FTA/state grant must have a letter from the carrier providing value of in-kind match agreeing to provide the in-kind miles, and describing the connecting service, its costs and the value provided

Connecting carrier may have requirements before granting in-kind miles, such as subsidized service must provide coordinated schedules, have interline ticketing, serve common terminals/stops—the benefit to that firm is the feed traffic from the rural areas

7Slide9

Network Prior to Greyhound Restructuring in 2004-2005

8Slide10

9Slide11

10Slide12

11Slide13

Potential Corridors for New Service

Based on demographic comparison of high need areas currently lacking service, combined with survey inputDeveloped to test potential demand, estimate possible costs

Washington, DC to Danville via Rt. 29Washington, DC to Blacksburg via I-66Washington, DC to Blacksburg via Rt. 7Washington, DC to Blacksburg via I-95Norfolk to Washington, DC via Tappahannock/Warsaw

Roanoke to Bristol

Washington, DC to Martinsburg, WV via Rt. 7

Washington, DC to Martinsburg, WV via I-66

Norfolk to Richmond

Norfolk to Harrisonburg

Norfolk to Danville

Richmond to Danville

Richlands

to Bristol

Richlands

to Roanoke

Big Stone Gap to Bristol

Covington to Lynchburg

12Slide14

Potential Corridor Map

13Slide15

Next Steps: Implementation Assistance

Consultation meetings (meet FTA SMR requirements)-December 2014Program and policy options/decisions

Identify needed changes in DRPT Section 5311 program guidance/application to incorporate intercity busDefine initial projects—routes, frequencies, connections, etc.Develop grant application, scope of servicesEvaluation criteriaAssistance in evaluating proposals14