PPT-Hirota integrable dynamics: from quantum spin chains to

Author : tatyana-admore | Published Date : 2016-04-09

AdS CFT integrability Vladimir Kazakov ENS Paris International Symposium Ahrenshoop   Recent Developments in  String and Field Theory Schmöckwitz August

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Hirota integrable dynamics: from quantum..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Hirota integrable dynamics: from quantum spin chains to: Transcript


AdS CFT integrability Vladimir Kazakov ENS Paris International Symposium Ahrenshoop   Recent Developments in  String and Field Theory Schmöckwitz August 2731 2012. Vladimir . Kazakov. (ENS, Paris). “. Facets . of Integrability: Random Patterns, Stochastic Processes, . Hydrodynamics. , Gauge Theories and Condensed Matter Systems. ” . S. imons institute, . NON-SUPERSYMMETRIC MULTI BLACK HOLE CONFIGURATIONS. A.Shcherbakov. LNF INFN Frascati (Italy). in collaboration with A.Yeranyan. Supersymmetry in Integrable Systems - SIS'12. Purpose. In the framework of N=2 D=4 supergravity, . . Natalia Storch, Kassandra Anderson & Dong Lai. Cornell University. Many hot Jupiter systems . have . been found to exhibit misalignment between the . orbital axis (. L. , the axis perpendicular to the orbital plane) . Alexander Burin. Motivation: . to study cooperative dynamics of interacting spins. 2. of . 21. Three alternative models. Classical model of resonant window . E. 0. for electronic spins . due to. . nuclear spins: . “. Kaleidoscope . of Exotic Quantum Phases in a Frustrated XY Model. ,”. Christopher N. Varney, Kai Sun, Victor . Galitski. , and Marcos . Rigol. , . Phys. Rev. . Lett. ., . 107. , 077201 (2011) (also chosen for Editor’s suggestion and . A Copernican View. C. S. Unnikrishnan. Gravitation Lab, . Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, . Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India. . E-mail address: . unni@tifr.res.in. Website: . www.tifr.res.in/~filab. By: Miles H. Taylor. The EPR Paradox. In 1935, physicists Albert Einstein, Boris . Podolsky. , and Nathan Rosen created a thought experiment that was supposed to show a lack of completeness in quantum mechanics, a relatively recent creation at the time. The thought experiment, later called the EPR paradox after the last names of the creators, was based upon a paradox they saw in the quantum entanglement idea of quantum mechanics regarding the fact that one cannot know observables from different sets. They began by imagining two physical systems that interact when created, so that they will be defined by a single quantum state (Blanton). In other words, one must begin by imagining two entangled particles. Even when separated, the two systems will still be described by the same wave function, no matter the distance between them, as they are still entangled. If someone measures an observable, such as the spin if the systems are photons, of one system, it “will immediately determine the measurement of the corresponding observable in the second system” (Blanton). This applies even at distances that special relativity should prohibit. Imagine that the two systems are light-years apart. According to quantum mechanics, measuring an observable in the first system forces the corresponding observable in the other system into a well-defined state immediately, despite the fact that they are not close enough to have an effect on one another. The information between the two has passed much too fast for the distance under the theory of relativity. This left two options for Einstein, . Building Blocks . Paola Cappellaro. Quantum Engineering Group - MIT. . The approach to QIP. Challenges in quantum information. Engineer a scalable quantum system. Control a large quantum system…. for advanced computing (. C. o. Q. u. NAC. ). Irfan Siddiqi. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley. Hartmut. . Häffner. , Joel Moore, Dan Stamper-. (Integrable Optics for High Intensity Beams). Jeffrey Eldred. , Sasha . Valishev. UChicago. Workshop Nonlinear & Collective Effects. 28 Oct 2017. 2. 2. Jeffrey Eldred |. . An RCS with Integrable Optics for the Fermilab PIP-III Upgrade. EMN Meeting: Quantum Comm. & Quantum Imaging, Berlin, Aug 2016. John S. Colton. Physics Department. Brigham Young . University, Provo, Utah. Student researchers: . Ken Clark. Daniel Craft. Jane Cutler. ” Workshop is to discuss theoretical and experimental hot issues related to quantum physics, from foundational issues (such as findings and ideas to investigate quantum effects in biological systems. The Workshop is supported by . Part 1. Outline. Introduction. Problems of classical physics. Black-body Radiation. experimental observations. Wien’s displacement law. Stefan – Boltzmann law. Rayleigh - Jeans. Wien’s radiation law. ----a critical evaluation. Rui. Xian(Patrick. ). D. W. Leung, et al., Efficient implementation of coupled logic gates for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 042310(2000). CO781, July 2010. . Outline.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Hirota integrable dynamics: from quantum spin chains to"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents