Hornig Fox Natalie Griffin Overcoming I mplementation C hallenges to Early Warning Systems and Seizing Opportunities Baltimore MD November 13 2014 Session Objectives Why Understand the need for EWS ID: 546973
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Joanna" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Joanna Hornig FoxNatalie Griffin
Overcoming
I
mplementation
C
hallenges
to Early Warning Systems and
Seizing Opportunities
Baltimore, MD November 13, 2014Slide2
Session ObjectivesWhy: Understand the need for EWSWhat
: Learn more about what an EWS is
How
: Understand some of the challenges and opportunities implicit in an EWS
Next
:
Identify a few steps that can be taken in your school or district to start or improve an EWSSlide3Slide4
The National Graduation Rate Challenge and Opportunities
Challenge
: Approximately 20 percent of America’s students drop out of high school and do not receive a standard diploma in four years
Opportunity
: There has been general improvement in the last decade, of about 10 percent nationally, to an 80-81 percent average
Opportunity:
Gains have been driven by a 15-percentage point increase for Hispanic students and a 9-percentage point increase for African-American students
Challenge
: Averages mask differences among sub-groups – at the state level, and within districts and schools. These can be up to and over 20 percentage points.Slide5
Getting StartedDo you know the college-going and success rate
in your district? From each of the high schools?
Do you know the
4-year cohort graduation rate
for your district? And each high school?
Are there differences among subgroups? (low-income, special education, ELLs/LEPs, Hispanic, African-American, White and Asian).
What do you know about feeder patterns from middle to high school? What do they tell you?Slide6
Indicators or influencers?
Special Education,
ELL/LEP
Standardized Test
Scores, GPA
6
Course Failure
Core Courses
Elective Courses
Poor Attendance
Overage: 1–2 years,
2
years+
Behavior Marks
Minor Referrals
Suspensions
Gender
Socio-economic Status
Parental EducationSlide7
QuestionsWhat do you suspect are the main contributors to students’ struggles?
To students’ strengths? Slide8
Key EWS Indicators
F
rom
L
ongitudinal Research Slide9
9
Four Year Graduation Rates by Freshman Absence Rates, from Chicago (CCSR)Slide10
23% of K-12 students in Oregon were chronically absent in 2009-10
Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ODE data, 2009-10.
Chronic Absence By Grade Level in OregonSlide11
Graduation Rate by GPA, from Chicago (CCSR)Slide12
Research TakeawaysGood News: Students are resilient and usually signal well before dropping out
Students start with one indicator and develop more indicators over time, 6
th
grade on
We have to mix prevention with intervention, especially in 6
th
– 9
th
grade
Some students will move up with their classmates even if they have an indicatorSlide13
Fundamental QuestionWhat do we need to do differently in middle schools to better prepare students for success in high school, college and careers?Slide14
What Do We Know About Students?
Pre-K and Elementary Grades
-Core academic competencies and socialized into the norms of schooling in a joyful manner
Middle Grades-Intermediate academic skills (reading comprehension and fluency, transition from arithmetic to
mathematics) and a need for adventure and camaraderie; extra help and support for students in need
High School
-Transition to adult behaviors and mind set and the right extra help for students with below grade level skillsSlide15
Our choice: Can we or can’t we change outcomes if students slide off-track?Slide16
What is an EWS?EWS are systems that result from collaboration among educators, administrators, parents and communities to use
data effectively to keep students on the pathway to graduation. The best EWS enable:
rapid identification of students who are in trouble
rapid interventions that are targeted to students’ needs, both immediate and long-term, for support, redirection and greater success
frequent monitoring of the success of interventions
rapid modification of interventions that are not working
shared learning with continuous improvementSlide17
What’s a Good Start?An EWS team organized around keeping students on-track: organizing data, developing student “support lists,” organizing adults, and applying interventionsImproving interventions
Developing new onesSlide18
Support List and Next Steps
Support List
All
students
with an EWS risk
factor
Students needing tutoring
/
mentoring
Students seeing the counselor/ social worker
Students receiving ELA/Math intervention class
Students referred to outside agencies
Students supported by other school partners
Students in
in- and out-of
school programming or clubsSlide19
Challenges and OpportunitiesSlide20
Challenges Large numbers of students with indicators overwhelm resourcesLarge numbers of students increase the challenge for teachers and other school adultsDifferentiation within classrooms becomes more difficultSlide21
Data Is attendance data entered frequently and consistently by the data entry person in the front office? By each teacher? By each person responsible for discipline/behavior reporting? By others?
Does the data system enable adults to view the ABCs for all students in a class? A grade? All students in a school? Longitudinally?
Can student “support” lists be produced easily (
eg
identify “at-risk” students based on indicators, not demographics)?
Are there agreed-on criteria for who is “at risk”?
Are reports relating to ABC
patterns
(students, subgroups, groups) available frequently? (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly?) Who has responsibility for analyzing these reports?Slide22
Data UseIs the data accurate, complete and consistent (for instance, is there a school-wide grading policy that holds teachers accountable for giving so-many gradable items per week? Is there consistency in the type of items that are graded?
Are teachers
entering grades at the same intervals? Etc.)
Is there a team structure that enables groups of adults to consider student data together?
Is there a set meeting time for the team (bi-weekly, one hour minimum) that is built into the schedule?
Are there protocols for data conversations?
Does school administration value the team meeting, and set expectations and hold team members accountable for participating? Do administrators participate?Slide23
EWS Team MeetingsDoes an interdisciplinary team of “the right people” meet
to coordinate, create, and monitor
support/interventions
for students who are exhibiting early warning
indicators?Slide24
EWS Discussion ProtocolIdentify Student (1 minute) Identifies
which off-track behaviors the student is exhibiting
Identifies
data supporting identification for intervention (from
EWS
report)
Team
provides information (2 minutes)
Team
members succinctly (monitor your airtime) provide additional information about
why
off-track indicators may be present
Team members discuss intervention options (3 minutes) Consult resource map Discuss who will champion follow up Determine date for follow-up conversation Determine communication with family Slide25
For students who are currently receiving interventions:
Team Members discuss Student Progress (2 minutes per student)
Identify
the student
support
Are the interventions/support working
to improve
student’s behavior
, course performance
, and/or
attendance?
How
do we know (student data)?What next?
EWS Discussion ProtocolFollow-Up MeetingsSlide26
Has the team defined what an “intervention” is?Have you asked, “What will we accomplish with this intervention?”Or, “Who will carry this intervention out”Or, “Which students are we not reaching?”
Or, “Are there students in this school who do not have a relationship with an adult? With a peer?“
Or, “Do we recognize students for improvement as well as achievement?”
Or, “How can we encourage more improvement?”
Student Support
Systems -- InterventionsSlide27
Student Support Systems/InterventionsHave available interventions been inventoried?Does the term “intervention” bring to mind only negative connotations or does it include comprehensive, school wide efforts to build student motivation and enthusiasm?
Are interventions categorized by level? (how many students, how serious are the challenges, how big are the opportunities, and how many adults are needed for success, for instance?) Slide28
Possible SnagsPolicy and PracticesDo policies and practices support promotion and graduation, specifically
supporting students in staying in
school, motivating
students
to learn
and
engaging them in
learning
at high
levels?
Do
policies and practices support efforts to overcome difficult-to-change
adult as well as student attitudes? Slide29
Possible Snags Communicating Across TransitionsDo middle grades personnel – many or all of them, beyond the counselors – communicate with high schools to
understand that and how academic and behavioral expectations differ between grades 8 and 9?
Are students frequently exposed to the differing expectations
before
they run into them head on in grade 9? Are they prepared?Slide30
What is the appropriate balance between expectations and support? What do each of those words mean in the context of your school?Do adults in your school show through their actions that it is part of their professional role to support students and not simply evaluate them – non-academically as well as academically?
Adult Attitudes – Hard QuestionsSlide31
More Hard Questions“What are the top problems?” “What are the challenges which are under the power of adults to influence?”
“What are the challenges that are beyond the power of adults to change?”
“How will we prioritize
?”
“What are the opportunities?”
“What might be three fruitful first steps?”Slide32
Broadening the Circle of SupportAre you drawing in school adults who represent many different perspectives on students (academic and elective teachers, counselors, school nurse, social workers, cafeteria workers, building engineers, school resource officers, etc.)Are you drawing in older students as mentors and tutors? As examples? From the high school? From local colleges?
Are you drawing in community adults?Slide33
Broadening the Circle of SupportAre you capitalizing on youth-engaged community resources? (retired teachers, alumni, librarians, folks who work at youth-serving community and health agencies, local judges and law enforcement representatives, for example)Are you capitalizing on business and higher-education related resources in or near your community? (the admissions and outreach folks at the community college, the chamber of commerce, the local economic development agency, etc.)Slide34
Invite the Community in
Attendance, behavior and course passing improves and
p
romotion and graduation rates riseSlide35
Almost a Last Word on EWS
Find out what works for your school!
T
he fewer indicators the better – aim for a simple, clean
system
Most students in need of interventions can be identified by the ABC’s. At the individual level, pay more attention to GPAs than state assessments.
Influencers
beyond
the ABCs are often useful in determining type of interventionsSlide36
What Works
Link the
EWS system to
overall
school
improvement, achievement improvement and curriculum, instruction and assessment efforts
Prioritize
Tie the EWS plan into the school improvement plan/strategic plan
Bring the community in
Envision the future and commit
to achieving it!Slide37
Contact InformationJoanna Hornig Fox
Deputy Director
Everyone Graduates Center
Johns Hopkins University
jhfox@jhu.edu
(410) 516-4338
Natalie Griffin
Promotion Coach, C.F. Vigor High School
Mobile County Public Schools, AL
natalgrif@Comcast.net
251-221-3045
251-591-6248