PPT-Applying the Coherence Principle

Chapter 8 Ken Koedinger 1 Coherence Principle Which is better for student learning A When extraneous entertaining material is included B When extraneous entertaining material is excluded. PRINCIPLE 2UNEXPECTED PRINCIPLE 3COPRINCIPLE 4CREDIBLE PRINCIPLE 5EMTINAL PRINCIPLE 6 SORIES Computational Models of Discourse. Presented by : Henock Tilahun . Information Ordering for Text Generation. Papers to be presented:. “. Evaluating Centering-based Metrics of Coherence Using a Reliably Annotated Corpus. Tomas . Mancal. Charles University in Prague. QuEBS. 09. 8.7.2009 Lisbon. Collaborators. : . Jan . Ol. šina, . Vytautas. . Balevičius. . and. . Leonas. . Valkunas. System of Interest: Photosynthetic Aggregates of Chlorophylls. Align Words To Corresponding Graphics. Presented By: . Chivonda. Coleman. This principle states that on-screen words should be placed near the parts of the on-screen graphics to which they refer.. When there is too much text to fit on the screen the text describing each action or state can appear as a small pop-up message that appears when the mouse touches the graphics.. Julia Hirschberg. CS 4705. Thanks to Dan Jurafsky, Diane Litman, Andy Kehler, Jim Martin . What makes a text or dialogue coherent? . “Consider, for example, the difference between passages (18.71) and (18.72). Almost certainly not. The reason is that these utterances, when juxtaposed, will not exhibit coherence. Do you have a discourse? Assume that you have collected an arbitrary set of well-formed and independently interpretable utterances, for instance, by randomly selecting one sentence from each of the previous chapters of this book.” . Plasmaspheric. Hiss . Van Allen Probes/BARREL 2014 . cooperative campaign. EFW team: Aaron Breneman, John . Wygant. , Cynthia . Cattell. , David . Malaspina. , and others. University of Minnesota. BARREL team: . Petr . Skopintsev. P04 Users . Meeting, 13.06.2014. Collaboration between:. Jens . Viefhaus. . (P04 – Beam line). Axel . Rosenhahn. . (. Analytical . Chemistry Group, Ruhr-University . Bochum. ). (. Chapter 9) . Ken Koedinger. 1. Personalization Principle. Which is better for student learning?. Conversational style of instruction. Formal style of instruction. Example. : . “. You. should be very careful if . Content Guide, pp. . 68-72. Personal routine . EL. EO/P. . . Not . (yet) evident . . . Emerging Developing. . Controlled. Emerging Coherence and Cohesion (EL):. Because his teeth need to be clean. . NET/C. # . Chris Klug. DEV-B315. Who am I?. The S.O.L.I.D . Principles. …have heard about S.O.L.I.D?. How many of you…. How many of you…. …can name all 5 principles?. How many of you…. :. What is Cache Coherence?. Cache Coherence: Do we need it? . Coherence Property - I:. Read R from Address X on Core C0 returns the value written by the most recent write W on X on C0, if no other core has written to X between W and R.. February 2016. 1. FOCUS IN GRADES 6-8. Introduction. : Who We Are. We are a team . of current and . former classroom teachers, curriculum writers, school leaders, and education experts who have worked in the private, public, and non-profit sectors. We are dedicated to . 1. We are a team . of current and . former classroom teachers, curriculum writers, school leaders, and education experts who have worked in the private, public, and non-profit sectors. We are dedicated to . David Attwood. University of California, Berkeley. 1. The short wavelength region of the electromagnetic spectrum. 2. n = 1 – δ + iβ δ, β << 1. Characteristic absorption edges for almost all elements in this spectral region.