PPT-Review Session II Logic and Reasoning

Review Session II Logic and Reasoning John likes any food Peanuts can be eaten Anything eaten is food Prove John likes peanuts f oodx gt likes Johnx eatablepeanuts e atablex gt foodx. Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved 1FQMFXIFFMMZVDDFGVMJNQMFNFUJHUIJLJMM hy does my child always have an attitude Shes often disruptive disrespectful or picking on other children Shes always the one with a chip on her shoulder A. rgue . S. uccessfully. Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Introduction. “Logic has been a formal academic discipline for . almost 2,500 years. For much of western history, logic was one of the main branches of schooling (the classical curriculum consisted of grammar, logic and rhetoric - Language used to persuade or influence others). With the growth of more specialized disciplines and wider curricula in the 20th century, formal logic got lost in the shuffle. In its place, philosophers began formulating courses in what we now call critical thinking, or informal logic.” (FactCheckEd.org, 2008). Pushpak Bhattacharyya. CSE Dept., . IIT Bombay . Lecture–4: Fuzzy . Inferencing. 29. th. July 2010. Meaning of fuzzy subset. Suppose, following classical set theory we say. if . Consider the n-hyperspace representation of A and B. Deductive reasoning. , also . deductive logic. or . logical deduction. or, informally, . ". top-down. " logic. , is the process of . reasoning. from one or more . statements. (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It differs from . In this session we will examine one of the main areas of philosophy, logic.. We will look at identifying logical fallacies inside statements (with examples from apologetic questions). We will also look at different ways to . CS482, CS682, MW 1 – 2:15, SEM 201, MS 227. Prerequisites: 302, 365. Instructor: . Sushil. Louis, . sushil@cse.unr.edu. , . http://www.cse.unr.edu/~sushil. Syllabus. Webpage: . http://www.cse.unr.edu/~sushil/class/ai/. by. Murat . Sensoy. , . Geeth. de Mel, . Wamberto. . Vasconcelos. . and Timothy J. Norman. Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, UK. 1. Outline. Introduction. Motivation. OLP Architecture. A Case Study and Performance. We have only examined knowledge that is true/false or truth preserving, but the world is full of uncertainty. we need mechanisms to reason with that uncertainty. We find two forms of uncertainty. unsure input. In this session we will examine one of the main areas of philosophy, logic.. We will look at identifying logical fallacies inside statements (with examples from apologetic questions). We will also look at different ways to . Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the . reasoner. begins with what he or she is trying to end up with". The individual components of a circular argument will sometimes be logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, and will not lack relevance. Circular logic cannot prove a conclusion because, if the conclusion is doubted, the premise which leads to it will also be doubted. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning. Reasoning with Uncertainty We have only examined knowledge that is true/false or truth preserving, but the world is full of uncertainty we need mechanisms to reason with that uncertainty We find two forms of uncertainty TASK. Choose some thing that is important to you. E.g. a hobby, an athlete, . an artist or a band. Try give reasons to your neighbour(s) why the thing you chose is good. Write down your reasons. TASK. [EBOOK] My First Logic Workbook for Gritty Kids: Spatial Reasoning, Math Puzzles, Logic Problems, Focus Activities. (Develop Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, Analytical STEM Skills in Kids Ages 4, 5, 6.)
http://skymetrix.xyz/?book=1735770884 Web conference. 17 May 2024. Document ADS-02-05. Agenda. 1.. Opening remarks. 2.. Adoption of the agenda. ADS-02-02. 3.. Adoption of the report of the previous session. ADS-02-01. 4.. Status of work.