/
February 6, 2012 Verification February 6, 2012 Verification

February 6, 2012 Verification - PowerPoint Presentation

test
test . @test
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2017-08-01

February 6, 2012 Verification - PPT Presentation

Western California Dan Tomaso Tyler Roys amp Brian Clavier HPC Analysis Monday 26 12z Forecast Concerns Timing Forecast Concerns Timing Forecast Concerns TerrainPType Forecast Concerns Previous Day ID: 574958

cat zones verification reports zones cat reports verification winds precip forecast amp mesonet awos asos verified 510 concerns radar wind 12z 505

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "February 6, 2012 Verification" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

February 6, 2012 Verification

Western California

Dan Tomaso, Tyler Roys,

& Brian ClavierSlide2

HPC Analysis, Monday 2/6 12zSlide3

Forecast Concerns- TimingSlide4

Forecast Concerns- TimingSlide5

Forecast Concerns- Terrain/P-TypeSlide6

Forecast Concerns- Previous Day

Warming due to compression with easterly, downsloping winds, Plot valid 2/5 2343zSlide7

FORECAST PERIOD BEGINS!Slide8

Forecast Concerns- High Wind Potential

Will 850 mb winds mix to the surface?850 mb

observations valid at 2/6 12zSlide9

Forecast Concerns- Freeze Possibility?

Plot valid 2/6 1243z

<= 32°F for 3 hours

is need for Freeze/Frost to verifySlide10

Forecast Concerns- 2/6 12z

Easterly winds at the onset?Slide11

HPC Analysis, Monday 2/6 12zSlide12

HPC Analysis, Tuesday 2/7 00zSlide13

HPC Analysis, Tuesday 2/7 12zSlide14

Regional Radar- 2/7 0201zSlide15

Regional Radar- 2/7 0800zSlide16

Regional Radar- 2/7 1159zSlide17

Eliminating Categories

“All-zero categories”All winter precipitation events (Categories 1-11)Used Redding observations and other cold sites to rule these out. Temperatures increased through our period.

Also used NOHRSC database:Slide18

Eliminating Categories

No snow=no blowing & drifting snow (Cat. 15)No blowing dust reports (Cat. 14)No smoke reported in ASOS/AWOS obs. (Cat. 16)Note: We did read through every ASOS/AWOS ob.

Visibilities from reports > 0.5 mile (No to Cat. 17)

Wind chill and extreme chill ruled out from coldest sites and wind chill chart (Cat. 18 & Cat. 19)

Flood categories (Cat. 21-24) ruled out via ASOS/AWOS

obs

and

Mesonet

obs

found at

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sgx/gmap/index.phpSlide19

Eliminating Categories

Lightning (Cat. 25) ruled out based on PSU eWall lightning data (next slide)Thunderstorm and severe thunderstorm (Cat. 26 & 27) ruled out based on ASOS/AWOS reports and lack of lightningSlide20
Slide21

Verifying High Winds/Severe Winds

Checked each ASOS/AWOS ob in our zonesExample:KSNS 071153Z AUTO 11031G38KT 10SM FEW120 16/01 A2973 RMK AO2

PK WND 11038/1153

SLP077 60000 T01610006 10178 20150 58015 TSNO

Also used max wind reports from NWS

Mesonet

Checked data quality by using surrounding reportsSlide22

High Wind Verification

Zones 1-4, 505, 508, 510, 512, 513, 517, 518, 528Slide23

Severe Wind Verification

Zones 1 and 510Gusts exceeded 50 knotsSlide24

Verifying Temperatures

Again ASOS/AWOS, Mesonet reports were used.Every zone examined in this waySlide25

Freeze Verification

Zones 4 & 15

Highest elevation sites

P-type again was not an issue as warm air pushed temperatures above freezingSlide26

Temperature ≥ 68°F VerificationSlide27

Temperature ≥ 68°F Verification

Zones 1, 3, 508, 510-511, 513-518, and 528

Easterly winds the culprit!Slide28

Verifying Precip

Used ASOS/AWOS and Mesonet reportsDifferent format for Mesonet reports:

http://www.cnrfc.noaa.gov/google_precip.php

Radar imagery (as seen before)

Radar estimated rainfall:

http://water.weather.gov/precip/Slide29

Mesonet ReportsSlide30

Precipitation Ending 2/7 12zSlide31

≥0.25” Precip

Verification

Zones 2, 17, 18, 63, 64, 76, 505-507, 510Slide32

3 hours of Precip Verification

Same zones verified as ≥0.25” precip category

Zones 2, 17, 18, 63, 64, 76, 505-507, 510

Used radar, ASOS/AWOS, and

mesonet

reportsSlide33

Verification Summary

No zones verified for Cat. 1-11, 14-19, & 21-27Zones that verified for high winds: 1-4, 505, 508, 510, 512, 513, 517, 518, 528Zones that verified for severe winds: 1 & 510Zones that verified for freeze/frost: 4 &

15

Zones that verified for T

≥ 68°F:

1, 3, 508, 510-511, 513-518, and 528

Zones that verified for

Precip

. Total

≥0.25” and 3 hours of

precip

:

2, 17, 18, 63, 64, 76, 505-507, 510

Slide34

Lessons Learned

Beware of downsloping winds!Timing of precip- GFS more on target than NAMProgression of storm system faster over water?

Look at observations first while forecasting

Leads to “

gimme

” points

Overlay terrain map on zone map, where is terrain an issue?

For verifying out west:

Mesonet

data!