PPT-Gettier’s
Author : test | Published Date : 2017-08-14
Argument The Tripartite Analysis S knows that P iff S has a justified true belief that P The Fallabilist Reply Knowledge is justified true belief and justification
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Gettier’s" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Gettier’s: Transcript
Argument The Tripartite Analysis S knows that P iff S has a justified true belief that P The Fallabilist Reply Knowledge is justified true belief and justification does not require certainty so knowledge doesnt require certainty either. This short piece published in 1963 seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge It stimulated a renewed effort still ongoing to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises From Analysis vol 23 966 Copyright by Ed 1 . Edmund Gettier, ?Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Knowledge. Knowledge. Knowledge. Knowledge is true judgment with an account.. Gettier’s. Argument. Gettier’s. Argument. Is Justified True . Belief Knowledge?. Gettier’s. . Argument. Smith and Jones are applying for a job with a company. Smith has just spoken to the president of the company and learned that Jones will get the job. Smith believes that Jones will get the job, and for good reason. Smith also believes that Jones has ten coins in his pocket. He just saw Jones empty his pocket looking for a quarter, and put ten coins back in the pocket. Smith has been watching him ever since and is sure he neither removed nor added any coins. . Read through my comments on your 9 mark question. Fill in your tracking sheet. Respond to any questions/tasks I have written on your work.. Try to re-write any sections of your work that needed improvement under the subtitle: . Having . four sides is . _________ for . being a square. .. Being a square is . __________ for . having four sides. .. Having three straight sides is ___________ for being a triangle.. Necessary and sufficient. What is Reliabilism?. Does Reliabilism describe knowledge well? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reliabilism?. How well does Reliabilism cope with Gettier and Fake Barn Cases?. What is Reliabilism? (2 marks). JTB account is only a definition of . propositional . knowledge. . Explain precisely what it is about the JTB account that Gettier is critiquing.. You can use other examples of Gettier cases if . Gettier’s. What is Reliabilism?. Does Reliabilism describe knowledge well? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reliabilism?. How well does Reliabilism cope with Gettier and Fake Barn Cases?. What is Reliabilism? (2 marks). Having . four sides is . _________ for . being a square. .. Being a square is . __________ for . having four sides. .. Having three straight sides is ___________ for being a triangle.. Necessary and sufficient. JTB account is only a definition of . propositional . knowledge. . Explain precisely what it is about the JTB account that Gettier is critiquing.. You can use other examples of Gettier cases if . Gettier’s. Michael Lacewing. enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk. Justified true belief. ‘. I know that . p. ’:. The . proposition ‘. p’. . is true;. I believe that . p. ; and. My belief that . p. is justified. Michael Lacewing. enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk. © Michael Lacewing . Justified true belief. ‘. I know that . p. ’:. The . proposition ‘. p’. . is true;. I believe that . p. ; and. My belief that . Gettier’s. two examples and explain what they show.. Can you think of any responses to . Gettier. ?. Responding to . Gettier. Objectives:. Understand two responses to . Gettier. and how they work.. Internalism. This Photo. by Unknown Author is licensed under . CC BY. A Priori. Introduction. A Priori and A Posteriori. Latin expressions developed by scholastic philosophers in the Middle Ages. . A priori : "from what is prior” .
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Gettier’s"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents