/
Legality of Electronic Signatures Legality of Electronic Signatures

Legality of Electronic Signatures - PowerPoint Presentation

test
test . @test
Follow
459 views
Uploaded On 2017-03-31

Legality of Electronic Signatures - PPT Presentation

Scott Trainor Deputy General Counsel DocuSign Nic Wolfe Corporate Counsel DocuSign DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIAL Agenda Primer on Electronic Signatures State of the Law in California Exceptions Case Law Support ID: 531892

electronic docusign signatures signature docusign electronic signature signatures confidential attribution law digital california act notices focus record state takeaway

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Legality of Electronic Signatures" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Legality of Electronic Signatures

Scott Trainor, Deputy General Counsel, DocuSignNic Wolfe, Corporate Counsel, DocuSign

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIALSlide2

Agenda

Primer on Electronic SignaturesState of the Law in California

Exceptions

Case Law Support

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIALSlide3

What is an Electronic Signature?

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIAL

Sound, symbol, process

Associated with record

Executed or adopted

By a person with intent to signSlide4

Digital Signature vs. Electronic Signature

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIALSlide5

Electronic Signature

Legal sufficiency vs. attribution

UETA answers the question “is it a signature?”

Does NOT answer the question “is it

your signature?”

It’s all in the PROOF

May be proven by any means, including

surrounding circumstances or efficacy of

agreed-upon security procedureDifferent risks may require different kinds of evidenceHow does your paper process provide proof? Could it be better?Slide6

The Keys to Enforceability

Attribution

Record IntegritySlide7

How DocuSign Assures Attribution

2. Audit Trail

1. Signer Identity

ID Check

Industry-Leading Choice of Authentication Options

Enterprise Add-On

Standard Method

Access Code

SMS

Phone

Third Party

Social ID

Digital Certs

Primary

Multifactor add-ons

Email Address

Federated/

SSO

DocuSign Account

KBA or

In Person

Electronic NotarySlide8

Enforceability: The eSignature Difference

5/1/2016 8:41:12 PM EST

name@email.com

IP: 192.156.22.122

ID Proofing Options:

One Time Password

Phone Authentication

Knowledge Based Authentication

Witnessed SigningDigital Certificate ValidationTamper-proof container

Paper Record

5/1/2016Slide9

How DocuSign Assures Record Integrity

Tags

Email Access Code

Recipient Roles

Restricted Access

Hashing and Encrypting

Tamper Evident 

Security CertificationsSlide10

The Legal Foundation for Electronic Signatures

Adopted by California along with 46 other states + DC

Recognizes the validity of

electronic signatures

in California business

UETA

Uniform Electronic

Transactions Act – 1999

Federal version of UETAInstant 50-state baselineRecognizes the validity of electronic signatures in interstate commerceESIGN

Electronic Signatures in Global & National Commerce Act – 2000

Permits CA state agencies to use

digital signatures

SECTION 16.5

Enactment of Sec 16.5 of the Government Code – 1995

A conflict arises:

Can state agencies use electronic signature? Slide11

Assembly Bill 2296

Clarifies that:Use of digital signature is discretionaryUse of electronic signature is permitted under UETA standards

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIALSlide12

Exceptions

Classic Exceptions

California-Specific

Exceptions

Laws governing wills, codicils or trusts;

Laws governing adoption, divorce or other family law matters;

All articles of the UCC (except Section 1-107, Section 1-206 and Articles 2 and 2A); and

Court orders or other official court documents that a party must execute in connection with court proceedings

Various notices focused on consumer protection, including notices of termination of health insurance, product recall, default under a residential mortgage and others;Any document accompanying the transportation of hazardous or dangerous materialsThe notice of cancellation regarding certain types telephonic solicitationsWritten authorization required by health care providers regarding release medical informationForeclosure, seizure, and collection notices

Vehicle financing and seizure notices

Health provider benefit notices

Defect statements for property conversionsDavis-Sterling Common Interest Development Act noticesFee-bearing post-dated check agreements

Lemon law buyback notices

Property seizure notices

Pandlord

/tenant notices and accounting statements

The list goes on…

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIALSlide13

Case Law Support in California

DOCUSIGN CONFIDENTIAL

Espejo

v. So. Cal. Permanente Med. Group.

Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group,

Inc.

Sollner

v. Linton.

Court’s Focus: AttributionIssue: Whether email + logging into portal are sufficient forms of attribution for electronic signatures?Holding: Yes.Takeaway

: Multiple forms of authentication increase attribution confidence

Court’s Focus: Attribution

Issue: Whether logging into home made portal is sufficient form of attribution for electronic signatures?

Holding

:

No.

Takeaway

:

Don’t build your own e-sign software

Court’s Focus: DocuSign

Issue

:

Whether the use of DocuSign is a

valid means of entering into a lease in California

Holding

:

Yes.

Takeaway

: DocuSign is recognized by courts across the world as a credible electronic signature providerSlide14

For more information, please contact your local DocuSign Sacramento Representative:

Jennifer BakerEnterprise Account Executive, Public Sector

Sacramento, California

DocuSign Inc.

(650) 561-5033 (Cell)

jennifer.baker@docusign.com