Transferable lessons for other PhDs Dr Fumi Kitagawa University of Edinburgh PIN Seminar 23 October 2015 Aim of this presentation is Capturing the Impact from Industrial Doctorates ID: 798674
Download The PPT/PDF document "Capturing the Impact from Industrial Doc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Capturing the Impact from Industrial Doctorates –Transferable lessons for other PhDs
Dr Fumi KitagawaUniversity of EdinburghPIN Seminar 23 October 2015
Slide2Aim of this presentation isCapturing the Impact from Industrial Doctorates –What are the Transferable lessons for other PhDs?
Let’s look at a bit of extreme form of ‘industry collaboration’ and ‘employer engagement’ through doctoral training (EngD)What are the transferable lessons to other
PhD programmes and cohort based schemes (e.g. CDT)?
Impact of the
EngDhttps://www.epsrc.ac.uk/newsevents/pubs/understanding-the-engd-impact-a-pilot-study/
Slide3Transferable contexts related to Doctoral trainingDoctoral education has created ‘misalignments and inefficiencies in the employment market for graduates’ (Servage
, 2009, p.765)?A growing calls for ‘rethinking’ contemporary approaches to doctoral education and research training (Barnacle and Dall’Alba, 2011; Halse and Mowbray, 2011)Diversifying destinations and career pathways
- reconsideration
of the purpose of the doctoral research training
(McAlpine and Emmioglu, 2015);Development of STEM doctoral students’ ‘professional identity’ and ‘reforms’ (Hancock
and Walsh, 2014
)
Slide4Evolution of Policy issues in the UK – Researcher development, impact, U-I collaboration, postgraduate skills
Roberts Review (2002)RCUK report “Excellence with Impact” (2010)Vitae (2012) A career development perspective of UK researcher-business interactions 2012. Wilson review of
Business–University Collaboration
(2012) RCUK (2015) Impact of Doctoral Careers
Slide5University-industry relationshipsAs Perkmann and Walsh argue (2007, p.263): Relationships will often occur in conjunction with human mobility: for example, when companies sponsor Ph.D. studentships. In fact, in many cases, mobility can be intrinsic to relationships if it occurs within the context of specific collaborative projects.
Limited understanding on the educational impact of university-business collaboration (Healey et al., 2014)
Slide6Changing landscape of doctoral training and EPSRC funding schemes1992 the Engineering Doctorates (EngD) 2009 Industrial
Doctorate Centres (IDCs) 2009 Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT)2013 Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT)https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/skills/students/centres/2013cdtexercise
/
There are individual PhD studentships combined with business engagement mechanisms such as Industrial CASE studentships, and Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTPs). BBSRC’s Professional Internship for PhD Students (PIPS)
EngD
IDC
CDT
CDT
Slide7EngD/IDC Cohort based doctoral research programmes75% of time spent in industry25% taught courses – including technical as well as business/management coursesResearch Engineers (REs) – both stipend and employees
EngD project – industry driven
Slide8Capturing the Impact from Industrial Doctorates –What are the transferable lessons?
Methodology – Exploratory study with one IDCs – survey with REs (2010/11)Evaluative study included interviews with 15 EngD industry sponsors (across 10 sectors); 20 alumni from EngD Centres/IDCs (2013/14); DLHE analysis; mid-term reviews
With additional 12 interviews with industry
sponsors of
two specific IDC (2015) ; a focus group meeting at a sponsoring company
Slide9Four Routes to Impacts
Slide10Slide11Slide12Four routes to impactsAsked sponsoring companies about EngD/IDC impact in relation to CASE PhD, KTP etc
Most of the collaborative doctoral research training would have “Knowledge-based benefits” and “People development” one way or another, but the extent to which industry partners perceive the impact from these “Routes to Impact” would vary. Most of the companies collaborating with doctoral research projects state that
“
Access to talents and recruitment”
is the key impact sought from the collaboration. “Open innovation and collaboration” - Sector specificity plus centre strategies“Innovation and commercial processes
” – close contact to the market – IDC uniqueness
Slide13Micro-dynamics of boundary spanning – transferable competences Boundary spanning – translating two identities; ‘dual identity’ with the competences to work in the two systems (see Gertner
et al., 2011)Barriers and ‘unintended costs’ of collaborative relationship buildingStudents with limited ‘legitimacy’ – voice from the ‘coal face’ (see Butler and Jeffrey 2007)Need to raise awareness within the sponsoring industry
Slide14Quotes from REs - Tough lessons to be transferable…..Nobody is able to really understand the research you do, even your supervisors (unlike PhD). Makes you feel very alone, but also develops strong skills in resilience and independence.….as an RE, you see the organisation with a third eye from an academic point of view, and you are better placed to see and solve problems (only if the managers can listen!)
to gain a compromise between what the different stakeholders want from the project, i.e. me, my company, my industrial supervisor, the University. Industrial supervisor was not made aware of the reason why senior management decided to go for the EngD. Also industrial supervisor is more focused on meeting short term objectives; he does not appreciate the length and benefits of research. He just needs to be educated on this.
Slide15“One of the best ways of achieving a good connection between two research groups, be they two academic, or an academic and an industrial one – is to have a person who is located in both, and these students fulfil that
role”. (academic manager of IDC)“Distinctive advantage of EngD is the fact that it is applied in nature. The EngD allows much closer interactions, closer support system than the PhD. However, this is one model – the spectrum of models – both PhD and EngD
are
needed”. (industry sponsor)
Slide16Concluding remarksDevelopment of professional identity need to be better understood including the ‘costs’ of the collaboration, for academic, industry as well as individual learning processes. Tacit processes of overcoming barriers and tensions would need to be legitimised as part of the learning process.
More understanding and support needed for “boundary spanning” to make it more transferable learning.
Slide17Concluding remarks 2A variety of forms of collaborative doctoral training schemes is a good thing. Industry partners have different needs and motivations for collaboration.
Diversity of funding mechanisms need to be designed and maintained.“People development” is the key impact of collaborative doctoral schemes. - Educational impact of university-business collaboration.
Impact from collaborative relationships needs to be captured in a more systematic way – short, mid and long term.
Slide18Some linkshttp://www.aengd.org.uk/news/news-releases/engineering-doctorate-benefits-uk-plc-identified/
http://www.business-school.ed.ac.uk/research-report/four-routes-to-impacts
Slide19AcknowledgementsThis presentation originates from a series of studies between 2010 and 2015Thanks to the EPSRC and AEngD, especially the
AEngD sub-committee; University of Bristol; University of Manchester and the MBus student team at MBS; University of Edinburgh (Business School and School of Engineering)Those who participated in the studies, e.g. Industry sponsors, doctoral students, alumni
Usual disclaimers apply.
Fumi.kitagawa@ed.ac.uk
Thanks for listening!