/
THE AMULET STUDY THE AMULET STUDY

THE AMULET STUDY - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
505 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-10

THE AMULET STUDY - PPT Presentation

A Multicenter Prospective Registry of the Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation David HildickSmith John Camm ID: 535890

laa device procedure amulet device laa amulet procedure implant patients study events atrial adverse months country data prior post

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "THE AMULET STUDY" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

THE AMULET STUDY: A Multicenter, Prospective Registry of the Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

David Hildick-Smith,

John

Camm,

Hans-Christoph

Diener

,

Ulf

Landmesser

,

Vincent

 Paul,

Boris

Schmidt,

Magnus

Settergren

,

Emmanuel

Teiger,

Claudio

Tondo

On behalf of Amulet Observational Study InvestigatorsSlide2

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

Grant/Research Support

Consulting Fees/Honoraria

St Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Gore, Abbott, Occlutech, Edwards, Terumo

Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below.

Affiliation/Financial Relationship

CompanySlide3

BackgroundThe St Jude Medical AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ is a percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage occluder device, designed to prevent thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage (LAA) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this analysis is to report short-term outcome data on the use of AMPLATZER™ Amulet™

LAA

OccluderSlide4

AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ Device

Lobe

Inside

the LAA

neck

Designed to conform to LAA anatomy

Stabilizing Wires

Engage with LAA wall

Help hold the device in place

Waist

Maintains tension between

l

obe and disc

A

llows device to self-orient

Disc

Completely seal

at the orificeSlide5

Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Device Implant Procedure

Measure LAA orifice, landing zone, depth

Deploy

LOBE

in

landing

zone

Deploy the

DISC

, to

cover

the ostium

Release

1

2

3

4Slide6

Key MethodsPatients were consented to participate prior to the procedure.Study follow-up visits were at 1-3, 6, 12 and 24 months post implant. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) at 1-3 months.An independent echocardiography core lab adjudicated all echo data Clinical Event Committee adjudicated all Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) reported in the study

.Slide7

Study Design and Flowchart

Design

DESIGN:

Prospective, multicenter, international observational study of the AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ LAA

occluder

.

OBJECTIVES:

Assess

acute serious adverse events

(0 - 7 days post procedure)

Assess late serious adverse events

(> 7 days

post-procedure

through 2

years)

Report

ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular

death

(through

2 years)

Report

bleeding

events

(through

2 years

)

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

David

Hildick

-

Smith, Brighton, UK

1073 patients enrolled between Jun 2015 and Sept 2016 in 64 clinical sites in Europe, Middle East, Asia, Australia, South America

13 patients

Device not implanted*

1060 patients

with

AMPLATZER Amulet LAA Occluder

implanted

1-3

Month Follow

Up

Completed

(N

= 711)

*

Device Not ImplantedNEvidence of intracardiac thrombus in LA7Anatomical/Sizing Considerations6

** Database lock: October 3, 2016

Not completed 1st F/U @ database lock** (N=349)Slide8

Results: Patient Population

Mean ± SD or %

n=1071*

Age (years)

75 ± 8

Gender - Female

35.6%

Prior Stroke

27.1%

Prior TIA

10.6%

Heart Failure

17.4%

Diabetes

31.4%

Hypertension

84.2%

Prior History of Major Bleeding

72.5%

CHA

2

DS

2

-VASc Score

>

4

65%

HAS-BLED

>

3

58%

*Baseline data unavailable in 2 patientsSlide9

Stroke and Bleeding Risk

8Slide10

Results: Indication for Procedure (N = 610)9

18% of patients on (N)OAC at time of consentSlide11

Implant Procedure

Imaging modality

% (n)

Intracardiac echo

10% (107)

Transoesophageal

echo

90% (966)

Device Selection

% (n)

First device selected implanted

93% (995)Slide12

Implant Success

Implant

No.

%

Implant Success

Defined as successful implantation of the Amulet device in the LAA.

1060/1073

98.8%Slide13

Major Adverse Events

Device/Procedure Related MAE

No.

%

Death

Related to Cardiac Perforation

Related to Myocardial Infarction

Related to Cardiorespiratory Arrest

3

1

1

1

0.3%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

Stroke

3

0.3%

Pericardial Effusion

Resulted in

Pericardiocentesis

Resulted in Surgical Intervention

5

4

1

0.5%

0.4%

0.1%

Embolization

1

0.1%

Bleeding

10

0.9%

Other

7

0.7%

TOTAL

29

2.7%Slide14

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant therapy (1-3 months F/U)

Baseline

N = 1073

Discharge

N = 1058

1-3 Month F/U

N = 719

None

40.6%

14.7%

6.5%

Single Antiplatelet

20.5%

23.8%

31.3%

Dual Antiplatelet

14.4%

41.8%

45.6%

(N)OAC only

15.8%

7.3%

4.7%

(N)OAC plus Single Antiplatelet

1.5%

1.9%

1.3%

Triple Therapy

0.7%

2.2%

2.4%Slide15

TEE verified LAA Closure Rate)14Independent Echo Core lab

utilized for

analysisSlide16

Comparison to Other Studies

ACP

Registry

1

Watchman

EWOLUTION

2

Amulet

(Current Study)

Implant Success

97.3%

98.5%

98.8%

LAA Closure Rate

(1-3 months)

<

5 mm

98.1%

99.3%

100.0%

Device or Procedure-Related Complications

5.0%

2.7%

2.7%

Early Mortality

0.8%

(30-day)

0.7%

(30-day)

0.3%

(7-day)

1

Tzikas et al.

EuroIntervention

.

2015;10

3

Boersma

et al.

Eur

Heart J

. 2016 Aug;37(31):2465-74. Slide17

ConclusionsThe Amplatzer Amulet device has very high technical implant success ratesImplantation is associated with low rates of peri-procedural and early adverse eventsAmulet demonstrated high closure ratesAntiplatelet therapy is appears to be a reasonable treatment strategy post-implantation in the short-termAdditional long-term data will be collected to confirm these promising early findingsSlide18

Thank you! To all 64 participating sites

Country

PI

Country

PI

Country

PI

Country

PI

Australia

 

 

 

Vincent

Paul

Jason

Sharp

Tony Walton

Glenn

Young

Germany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas

Eul

Sven Fischer

Volker Geist

Christoph Geller

Ulf Landmesser

Thorsten Lewalter

Kai Magnusson

Thomas Massa

Heyder

Omran

Jai-

Wun

Park

Christopher PiorkowskiBoris SchmidtHorst SievertJochen WoehrleTobias ZeusHong Kong Anna ChanSimon LamSpainDabit ArzamendiArmando BethencourtIgnacio CruzXavier FreixaIgnacio Garcia BolaoJ.R. Lopez MinguezRafael Ruiz SalmeronIrelandKevin WalshIsraelMichael GliksonAustriaGünter StixItaly

 

     

  

Sergio Berti

Francesco

Caprioglio

Antonio Colombo

Paolo Della Bella

Paolo

Golino

Paolo

Magnavacchi

Jacopo

Oreglia

Giuseppe

Tarantini

Claudio

Tondo

Belgium

 

Adel

Aminian

Werner

Budts

Chile

Daniel

Aguirre

Sweden

Jacob

Odenstedt

Magnus

Settergren

Denmark

 

J.E.

Nielsen-Kudsk

Lars

Søndergaard

Switzerland

Christian

Sticherling

Finland

 

 

Juha

Lund

Juha

Sinisalo

Saila

Vikman

United Kingdom

Robert Butler

Brian Clapp

Dhiraj

Gupta

David

Hildick

-Smith

France

Jean-Sylvain

Hermida

Didier Klug

Luc

Lorgis

Emmanuel

Teiger

Jean-Benoit

Thambo

Netherlands

Rob de Winter