/
Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese Medicine

Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese Medicine - PowerPoint Presentation

udeline
udeline . @udeline
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2022-04-07

Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese Medicine - PPT Presentation

Profession An Exploration of Attitudes and Beliefs in Relation to Education and Cultural Change Belinda Anderson PhD LAc Academic Dean Pacific College of Oriental Medicine New York Associate Professor Albert Einstein College of Medicine ID: 910605

medicine research amp science research medicine science amp agree students scientific year eip faculty pluralism knowledge strongly public practice

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Evidence-Based Medicine and the Chinese Medicine Profession

An Exploration of Attitudes and Beliefs in Relation to Education and Cultural Change

Belinda Anderson, PhD,

LAc

Academic Dean, Pacific College of Oriental Medicine (New York)

Associate Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Acupuncturist and Chinese Herbalist, New York University Fertility Center

Slide2

ContentBrief history of how PCOM-NY got involved with research

Current externally funded research projectsNIH funded 5-year Evidence Informed Practice research projectPilot pre-grant data

Qualitative exploration of attitudes, beliefs and perspectives

Scientific worldview differences between MD and PCOM students

Conclusions and lessons learned

Slide3

Brief HistoryMy research background/history

The NESA/Harvard NIH grantPartnering with EinsteinInterprofessional student exchange program

Faculty appointment

3 externally funded research grants

Slide4

Current Research Projects

NIH National Center for Complementary and Integrated HealthK07 Career development awardEvidence Informed Practice: Faculty and Curriculum Development

2013 – 2018

Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

Acupuncture clinical trial

2015 - 2018

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

Residency training program in wellness and prevention

2015 – 2018

Council of Colleges for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

Investigating the scientific worldview differences between MD and PCOM students

2016 - 2017

Slide5

NIH EIP Project

Slide6

Components

EIP skills/knowledge StudentsDeveloped a Foundations of EIP (FEIP) course – in all CM programsPre and post tested self-reported skills/knowledge and importance

Faculty

Online EIP modules – University of Minnesota

FEIP course in doctoral upgrade program

Incorporating EIP into 70% of didactic entry-level CM curriculum

Incorporating EIP into 100% of clinical entry-level CM curriculum

Attitudes/beliefs/perspectives

Pre-grant pilot data

Qualitative study

Slide7

NIH EIP Project – Pilot Data

Surveys undertaken to provide data for the NIH proposalExploring faculty and student’sResearch skills and usage

Support for research

Attitudes, beliefs and perspectives about evidence-based medicine

Slide8

Pilot Data Survey

Faculty

Students

#

Close-ended Qs*

14

18

# Open-ended Qs

1

1

Response Rate

89% (102/115)

42% (176/420)

Prior Research Ed.

51%

40%

Prior Res. Ed. Grad Level41%34%

* Close-ended

questions with

5-point

Likert

answers (Strongly agree; Agree; Neutral; Disagree; Strongly disagree).

Results expressed as %Agree + Strongly agree

Slide9

Outcome of Surveys#(% strongly agree + agree)

Faculty

Students

Research Literacy –

can

find/evaluate

75

85*

Supportive

of

research

88

-

Interest in p

articipating in research

& EIP Training73-EIP is of value to complementary & integrative medicine81

76

*4

th

year students who had taken the introductory research course

#

Anderson et al. 2014. JACM 9:705; Anderson et al. 2016. Explore 12:366

Slide10

Outcomes of Student Survey(% strongly agree + agree)

Research Value

1

st

year

2

nd

year

3

rd

year

4

th

year

Trend

Outside

the profession*83858280NSCompatibility of science & CM63

47

50

31

P

<0.01

Desire for further research training---33-

* Referral, insurance coverage, public perception

Slide11

Similar Survey at NESA and OCOM(Wayne et al. 2010. Explore 6:22)(% strongly agree + agree)

Year 1

Year 2

Year

3

Trend

Research value outside the profession

92

85

85

NS

Research learning & participation

76

67

37

p

<0.0008Research value to improving clinical practice

87

76

45

p

<0.005

Slide12

Challenges Going in

Resistance – themes from open-ended survey questionsIncompatible paradigmsCooptation

Relevancy to CM practice

Cultural issues

These issues were not highlighted by the faculty needs analysis using the instrument developed at Northwestern Health Sciences University

Suspected unique challenges within CM profession

Slide13

Qualitative study

Slide14

Qualitative Study

First cohort taking Fundamentals of Evidence Informed Practice as part of the doctoral upgrade program (DACM)Average years in practice 11.5Analysis of online forumsBased on

Kaptchuk

and Miller (2005).

What is the most ethical model for the relationship between mainstream and alternative medicine: opposition, integration or pluralism?

Academic Medicine. 2005,

80:286-290

They were asked to

discuss the most ethical model for the relationship between mainstream and alternative medicine

31 of 33 students participated

There were 33 initial

posts (average 428 words/post), 127

response

posts (average

of four

responses/initial post, with average

length of response of 108 words).

Slide15

Opposition/Integration/Pluralism(Kaptchuk

& Miller 2005)

Opposition

-

rejection of alternative medicine by conventional medicine

Integration

- amalgamating

conventional and alternative

therapies together

in a holistic approach to the treatment of disease and promotion of

wellness

Pluralism

-

conventional and alternative therapies

used together, but where cooperation

, research, and open communication and respect between practitioners preserves the integrity of each of the treatment systems

Slide16

Major Themes

Major Themes

Total

# comments

Total # & % of students that mentioned

Preference for the pluralistic model

23

21 (68%)

Opposition to integrative model

21

15 (48%)

Importance of patient centeredness

18

17 (55%)

Power imbalance &co-option issues

23

12 (39%)Imp of interprofessional education1310 (32%)

Issues –

research methodology & paradigms

10

7 (23%)

“I choose pluralism as our best ethical option

”“The limitations of homogenizing two incongruous perspectives do a disservice to both. Interpreting a completely different system using a singular language is at best incoherent, and at worst, ineffective or harmful”.

“The goal above all else is that the patient gets the best care

“Western Medicine is in charge of our destiny, and that is due to their social, economic and political influences

“It seems that education is key.  In order for there to be respect and referrals among different modalities, we need to understand what each modality does, and where its strengths and limitations lie.  All practitioners need to know when to refer out, and have an idea of where to refer”

“Western based science looks at the world by tearing it up into very small pieces that can be analyzed.  By doing this to Eastern medicine, meaning and understanding are often lost.  Western medicine is interested in coming up with explanations for things, but we don’t always have quick explanations for how treatments work and therefore they become easily dismissed as invalid“

Slide17

Minor Themes

Minor Theme

Total # of comments

Total # & % of students that mentioned

Pluralism requires patients be able to advocate for themselves

6

4 (13%

Prior education focused on integrative model

5

5 (16%)

Against opposition model

5

5 (16%)

Pluralism maintains the integrity of CM

3

3 (10%)

Importance of thousands of years of anecdotal evidence

3

2 (6%)

Pluralism is also in CM

3

2 (6%)

“Creating an environment where the patients ability to be part of the game – and accommodate them when they are sub optimally resourced – is something our medical practices and institutions should endeavor to be nimble and responsive to without judgement, agenda or manipulation”. “Most of us had no idea about this term in our medical system prior to this class. We were all stuck on integration”

“I do agree that opposition (at least ongoing opposition) is unethical and unreasonable as a strategy for functional relationship”

“If I had to choose, I would choose pluralism, but this choice is only chosen, as the least damaging to the integrity of our medicine”

“heralded in the West is the newest technology or drug, while heralded in the East is a lifetime of experience treating the human mechanism”

“this pluralistic streak in our own medicine has been integral to its continued evolution”

Slide18

Scientific Worldviews

Slide19

Survey Instrument

Validated - Thinking about Science Survey Instrument – Cobern 2000 SLCSP 151. Kalamazoo, MI: Scientific Literacy and Cultural Studies Project 

Designed to measure

differences in scientific worldviews

- socio-cultural

resistance to, and support for,

science

The instrument consists of 60 questions with 5-point

likert

scale answers

Categories of Qs - epistemology

;

science and economy

;

science and the

environment; public

policy and science; science and public health; science, religion and morality; science, emotions and aesthetics; science, race and gender; and science for all

Slide20

Research Questions

Do MD and CM students have different scientific worldviews?Do students who chose, or not, to participate in the interprofessional

exchange program have

different scientific worldviews?

Does an inter-professional student education exchange program

change

their

scientific worldviews?

Slide21

Outcomes

Q

Category

# Qs statistically different

# agree/disagree

Public policy

4

0

Public

health

4

0

Epistemology

4

3

Emotion & Aesthetics

31Economy

2

0

Race & gender

2

2

Science for all10Environment/Resource0

0

Religion & morality

0

0

Response rates – Einstein (122/170 = 72%; PCOM 48/107 = 45%)

Slide22

Questions where Einstein & PCOM students were on opposite sides of neutral (3)*

Q Category

Question

Einstein*

PCOM*

P

Value

Public health

8. Scientific knowledge is the single most important factor in the improvement of medicine and public health.

3.26

2.6

0.002

Race and gender

53. The scientific community is mostly dominated by white men and is often unfriendly to minority people.

3.31

2.88

0.02

Epistemology

60. Scientific knowledge is the truest form of knowledge.

3.32

2.67

0.001

Epistemology

33. The methods of science are the most reliable source of true, factual knowledge.

3.66

2.81

<0.0001

Race and gender

23. The scientific community is mostly dominated by men and is often unfriendly to women.

3.35

2.92

0.01

Economy

42. Science is our best source of useful knowledge.

3.69

2.79

<0.0001

Epistemology

34. Science is the best source of reliable knowledge.

3.75

2.90

<0.0001

*Means of

Likert responses:

Strongly agree = 5; Agree = 4; Neutral = 3; Disagree = 2;

Strongly

disagree =

1)

Slide23

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

Slide24

Conclusions and lessons learned

CM students, faculty and practitioners:Are not anti scienceUnderstand and support the role of research in legitimizing CM

But are

concerned

about:

Autonomy and continued authentic practice of CM

Cooptation

Inappropriate research methodology being used for CM

Keeping the patient at the center

The need for interprofessional education to engender respect and understanding

Slide25

Acknowledgments

Research mentorsDrs. Ben Kligler, Paul Marantz at EinsteinDr. Roni Evans, University of

Minesotta

Dr. Corbin Campbell

,

Teachers College Columbia

University

Research Colleagues

Drs. Diane McKee, Arya Nielsen, Claudia

Citkovitz

,

Funding bodies: NIH, PCORI, HRSA, CCAOM

Institutional support: PCOM, Einstein, Teachers College Columbia University

Slide26

Thank youBelinda (Beau) Anderson

Pacific College of Oriental Medicine 110 William St, 19th floor

New York, NY 10038

212 982 3456 x216

banderson@pacificcollege.edu