/
DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION

DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION - PDF document

unita
unita . @unita
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-10-14

DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION - PPT Presentation

Water and Rivers Commission WN22 April 2001 Natural Heritage Trust GOVERNMENT OFWESTERN AUSTRALIA Waternotes Waternotesforriversmanagement Wetlandsdegraded suffering from the loss of nativegrou ID: 960019

western australia water pmep1999 australia western pmep1999 water herbicide department weeds 1993 aquatic frogs toxicity control weed klemm fletcher

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

DVISORYOTESFORANAGERSONIVERANDESTORATION Water and Rivers Commission WN22 April 2001 Natural Heritage Trust GOVERNMENT OFWESTERN AUSTRALIA Waternotes Waternotesforriversmanagement Wetlandsdegraded, suffering from the loss of nativegroups and government agencies. Weedcommonly the largest component of aefficiently control wetland weeds,concern over the effects of these syntheticchemicals on native fauna and flora. TheFor example, erosion of banks overgrownChoice of Weed Removal Techniquesused in preference to herbicides. Hand removal is suitableinfestations. Plants need light and air, and smotheringdrowning of emergent species such as Bulrush by cuttingthe species beneath the water level in winter. Slashing ofintegrated weed management approach. The followingcontrolled with the use of herbicide. These usually includerhizomatous species such as Kikuyu, Couch and Nutgrass.It may also be better to spray large infestations of difficultto remove weeds such as Blackberry and Arum Lily, and tostem inject or paint the cut stems of large woody weedssuch as Japanese Pepper. Initial treatment with herbicidethe bank together. Spraying weeds and leaving the root(Scheltema & Harris 1995; Hussey & Wallace 1992).Frogs and Herbicide Useresearch on their effects on West Australian ecosystems.very small range of species. Frogs have been found to be effectiveness of the chemicals (Bidwell & Gorrie 1995). Two herbicides have been tested to a limited extent in localflora if used according to directions. These herbicides,system (Mann 1998; Woodcock et al 1993; PMEP1999).To increase the safety factor, the life cycles of frogs in thewetland system need to be known. If possible, avoidjuvenile frogs into the surrounding area. This period variesand early spring each year. Adult mature frogs are far lessunsprayed to allow this to happen easily (WAMuseum1999, Alcoa Frogwatch).It is important that herbicide use is as effective as possible,applications required. The following principles areApply herbicide according to the recommended If possible, try to spray when surface water levels are low, generally in early winter after germination appreciably.Ensure that weeds are sprayed at the correct time, usually when they are growing st

rongly, and Minimise damage to frogs by determining the frogs emerge from the water.Mix in a coloured dye so that you can accurately Ensure adequate follow-up of weed treatment, so Where possible, wipe or inject weeds with Do not spray if plants are under stress, such as on Do not spray on windy days, or if it is likely to Avoid using surfactants, as many of these are more If contractors are to be used for herbicide above principles (Scheltema & Harris 1995; Hussey &Wallace 1992; Pierce 1999).disposal procedures. These instructions are listed on theThe following herbicides are recommendedforuse by community groups if used withcare and according to instructionsbioaccumulate. It is has a low toxicity to bees, fish andother aquatic organisms (Brain and O’Connor 1988;Klemm et al 1993; PMEP1999). Some of the surfactants used in agricultural formulationsitself (Bidwell and Gorrie 1995; Klemm et al 1993; PMEP1999). Newly developed formulations such as Roundupby organic and mineral suspended particles in water bodies,so leaching and contamination of runoff is negligible(PMEP1999). There is no residual weed control, and an It is used for control of a large variety of weeds, generallypractically non-toxic to ducks and mammals (PMEP1999).It also has a low toxicity to fish and aquatic organismshas been tested in Western Australia and wasfound to be highly effective in removing introducedinvertebrates (Woodcock et al 1993).It is rapidly absorbed by plants and is rainfast within 1 hour.take up to 5 weeks to completely die. Spraying should occurbefore flowering (Crop Care Australasia Pty Ltd 1997). is only slightly soluble in water, and is rapidly(Moore and Fletcher, n.d.). It is commonly used for controlof Veldt Grass, Kikuyu, Couch and Water Couch whereThe following herbicides are recommendedforuse by professionals onlyMetsulfuron-methyl (Brushoff, Ally, Groper and Escort)harmless by-products (PMEP1999). very low toxicity to aquatic microorganisms and terrestrialinvertebrates (Klemm et al 1993; Moore and Fletcher, n.d.;PMEP1999).and Fletcher, (n.d.) have reported a residual activity of upIt is commonly used for control of Cape Tulip, Patterson’sCurse and Blackberry., Tacklemost broadleaf weeds and some grasses (PMEP199

9). invertebrates (Brain and O’Connor 1988; PMEP1999). This herbicide is not readily adsorbed to soil or organicmatter (PMEP1999), and may be prone to leaching. It isand Fletcher, n.d.).Death of plants may be slow (PMEP1999). It is commonlyused for Cape Tulip, Patterson’s Curse and Arum Lilysubmerged and emergent aquatic weeds (Klemm et al1993; PMEP1999). organisms, a low to moderate toxicity to fish and aquaticorganisms, and a low to high toxicity to birds (Brain andHowever, it should be noted that the rapid death of plantsspecies. Therefore, it is recommended that large areaswhere the weed growth is dense. Fish have died in WesternAustralia where this product has not been used carefully.affected by rain shortly after application (Crop CareWest Australian studies have shown that spraying Diquatcover by 80 – 90%, but the effectiveness decreased rapidly,after 30 days. This study recommended the use of aregeneration necessitated further treatment (Pierce &biologically unavailable. It is therefore unlikely to causecontaminated leachate or runoff (Klemm et al 1993; PMEP1999). When used in aquatic systems, Diquat is rapidlydissipated via sorption with aquatic sediments, organicIt is commonly used for floating and submergent aquaticweeds, such as Water Hyacinth and Hydrocotyle. Acute Toxicity of aHerbicide to Selected Frog SpeciesEnvironmental Protection, Western Australia.Brain, K. and O’Connor, B. 1988, The Toxicity ofPesticides to Wildlife. Department of Agricultural,Western Australia. Crop Care Australasia Pty Ltd 1997, emergence Selective Herbicide. Western Australia.Crop Care Australasia Pty Ltd 1999, Reglone: Non-residual. Western Australia.Hussey, B. M. J. & Wallace, K. J. 1992, Managing YourManagement, Western Australia. Klemm, V., Siemon, N. and Ruiz-Avila 1993, HydrocotyleRanunculoides: AControl Strategy for the Canning River. Swan River Trust, Western Australia.Acute Toxicity of Herbicide-Formulation Surfactants to Four Species of WesternAustralian Frogs. Report prepared for the WaterCorporation of Western Australia at Curtin University ofTechnology, Western Australia.Moore, J. H. and Fletcher, G. E. (n.d.), Environmental. Agricultural Department of WesternPEMP1999, Extension Toxicology Network Ð herbicide.

Cornell University extension services,Declared Plant Control HandbookAgricultural Department of Western Australia, WesternHydroctyle: Chemical Control with. Report prepared for the West AustralianAgriculture Department, Western Australia.Scheltema, M. and Harris, J. eds. 1995, Managing PerthÕs. Greening Western Australia, Western Australia.West Australian Museum 1999, Alcoa FrogwatchNewsletter No 4 Sept 28, West Australian Museum,Western Australia.Woodcock, S. Rose, T. Trayler, K. Chalmers, C. 1993, Trial to Determine the Effect of the Herbicide Fluazifop-report to the Swan River Trust, Western Australia.Further readingAgricultural Department of Western Australia 1989,Environmental Effects of HerbicidesAgricultural Department of Western Australia. WA,Western Australia.Byrd, Dr. J. 1998, Weed Control. ToxicityHanselka, Dr C. Rollins, Dr. D. and Winn, J. 1996,Reducing Herbicide Risks to Wildlife in RangelandHealth Department of WA1993, Pesticides in Water catchment Areas.of WA, Western Australia.Helfrich, L. Weigmann, D. Hipikins, P. Stinson, E. 1996,Pesticides and Aquatic Animals: Aguide to ReducingImpacts on Aquatic Systems. Virginia CooperativeExtension. Virginia, USA.Moore,. J. H. and Fletcher, G. E. (n.d.) Environmental. Agricultural Department of WesternAustralia, Western Australia.Kate Brown, Environmental Weeds Action NetworkPO Box 492, Fremantle, WA. Phone: (08) 9221-5311Health Department’s Pest Control Branch Dr Ken Aplin, Alcoa Frog Watch CoordinatorWestern Australian Museum. Phone: (08) 9427-2826 For more information contactEast Perth Western Australia 6004Telephone: (08) 9278 0300Facsimile:(08) 9278 0301or your regional officeWebsite: http://www.wrc.wa.gov.auThis water note is produced as part of the Waterways WAProgram.Managing and enhancing our waterways for the future. Text by Linda Taman. Reviewed by John Moore, Agriculture WesternAustralia.Water note project coordination by Heidi Bucktin and Virginia Shotter.Printed on recycled paper April 2001This Water Note is intended to be a general guide only and is not a comprehensiveRestoration & Management Section at the Water and Rivers Commission. Tell us what you think of our publications athttp://www.wrc.wa.gov.au/public/feedback/ ATER ANDIVERS COMMISS

Related Contents


Next Show more