1 1 SSES Sensor Suite Evaluation System Helen
CM
Published · 30 slides · 0 views
1 / 1
Description
1 1 SSES Sensor Suite Evaluation System Helen Anderson, Steven Beres, Joseph Shaw, Timothy Valadez Thursday, 5 March 2009 Preliminary Solution Space Development 5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez General Comments Potential solutions
Related Topics
Share
Embed code
Download this presentation From Below
"1 1 SSES Sensor Suite Evaluation System Helen" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
01
1 1 SSESSensor Suite Evaluation System Helen Anderson, Steven Beres, Joseph Shaw, Timothy Valadez
Thursday, 5 March 2009 Preliminary Solution Space Development 5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Thursday, 5 March 2009 Preliminary Solution Space Development 5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
02
General Comments Potential solutions fall into three general threads
Strictly manual processes
Model based processes including manual actions that are enabled / facilitated by a software development environment / tools / decision aids
Database / rule based / expert system processes
Significant overlap exists between threads
E.g. model based software application will likely include database / archiving functionality, all approaches will include involve a high degree of manual action
Functional decomposition may appear redundant in some areas due to separate consideration of modeling, analysis, and display functions
Done deliberately since implementation of these functions may be quite different 5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez 2<br>
Strictly manual processes
Model based processes including manual actions that are enabled / facilitated by a software development environment / tools / decision aids
Database / rule based / expert system processes
Significant overlap exists between threads
E.g. model based software application will likely include database / archiving functionality, all approaches will include involve a high degree of manual action
Functional decomposition may appear redundant in some areas due to separate consideration of modeling, analysis, and display functions
Done deliberately since implementation of these functions may be quite different 5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez 2<br>
03
5 March 09 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez 3 SSES Functional Decomposition Design & Assess ESS 1 Assess and represent site characteristics 1.2.2 Construct elevation model 3.2.3 Model sensor coverage and Pd 2.1 Classify threats by type & attributes 4.2 Estimate ESS total cost 1.2.4 Manage site models & data 2.6 Support route planning models 4.1.2.2 Worst case area Pd 4.1.2.1 Perimeter Pd & Pinterdict 4.1.2.3 Worst case Pkeep-out 4.1.3.2 Min response time routes 4.1.3.1 Max vulnerability routes 4.1.3.3 Cumulative Pd coverage 4.1.3 Display vulnerability 4.2.1 Procure, install, operate cost 2.3 Support sensor models<br>
04
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.1.1 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.1
Obtain, display, and use site attributes and characteristics data 1.1.1
Obtain, display, and manipulate topographic, characteristic, and feature data 1.1.1.3
Obtain and represent data on discrete site features and objects that may affect sensor performance or threat mobility 1.1.1.1
Classify terrain based on physical characteristics that may affect sensor performance, and threat mobility and detectability 1.1.1.2
Obtain, display, and manipulate topographic, characteristic, and feature data 1.1.1.4
Obtain, display, and manipulate site elevation data from external sources 1.1.1.5
Obtain, display, and utilize site imagery data Direct specification of individual terrain characteristics
Indexed terrain data with exemplars
Hybrid - indexed with editable characteristics Obtain
Manual data entry / editing
Software enabled maual capture of image / map data
Automated pattern/feature recognition of image data
Direct interface with GIS databases and image archives
Display / manipulate:
Paper maps with overlays
Hard copy tabular data
Software generated maps and displays
Interactive GUI development environment Patch and facet / wire frame models
Coordinate geometry models
Data base position/shape entry Software import of DTED data from file / CD
Software import of other DEM data from file / CD
Direct interface with GIS systems
Automated interpolation of map/image contours
Manual parsing and entry of elevation data File of hardcopy imagery
Image database with display tools FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.1
Obtain, display, and use site attributes and characteristics data 1.1.1
Obtain, display, and manipulate topographic, characteristic, and feature data 1.1.1.3
Obtain and represent data on discrete site features and objects that may affect sensor performance or threat mobility 1.1.1.1
Classify terrain based on physical characteristics that may affect sensor performance, and threat mobility and detectability 1.1.1.2
Obtain, display, and manipulate topographic, characteristic, and feature data 1.1.1.4
Obtain, display, and manipulate site elevation data from external sources 1.1.1.5
Obtain, display, and utilize site imagery data Direct specification of individual terrain characteristics
Indexed terrain data with exemplars
Hybrid - indexed with editable characteristics Obtain
Manual data entry / editing
Software enabled maual capture of image / map data
Automated pattern/feature recognition of image data
Direct interface with GIS databases and image archives
Display / manipulate:
Paper maps with overlays
Hard copy tabular data
Software generated maps and displays
Interactive GUI development environment Patch and facet / wire frame models
Coordinate geometry models
Data base position/shape entry Software import of DTED data from file / CD
Software import of other DEM data from file / CD
Direct interface with GIS systems
Automated interpolation of map/image contours
Manual parsing and entry of elevation data File of hardcopy imagery
Image database with display tools FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
05
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.1.2 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.1
Obtain, display, and use site attributes and characteristics data 1.1.2
Represent environmental characteristics and assess environmental effects on ESS sensor and network performance 1.1.2.3
Represent personnel, vehicular, and animal traffic that may trigger sensors 1.1.2.1
Represent weather including temperature, precipitation, airborne particulates, and winds 1.1.2.2
Represent electromagnetic and radio-frequency interference that may interfere with sensors and wireless networks 1.1.2.4
Maintain a list/database of environmental conditions / factors Direct specification of environment parameters
Indexed environment data with standard environments
Hybrid - indexed with editable parameters Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities Software model environment database
Electronic environment database
Hard copy tabular environment data FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 5 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.1
Obtain, display, and use site attributes and characteristics data 1.1.2
Represent environmental characteristics and assess environmental effects on ESS sensor and network performance 1.1.2.3
Represent personnel, vehicular, and animal traffic that may trigger sensors 1.1.2.1
Represent weather including temperature, precipitation, airborne particulates, and winds 1.1.2.2
Represent electromagnetic and radio-frequency interference that may interfere with sensors and wireless networks 1.1.2.4
Maintain a list/database of environmental conditions / factors Direct specification of environment parameters
Indexed environment data with standard environments
Hybrid - indexed with editable parameters Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities Software model environment database
Electronic environment database
Hard copy tabular environment data FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 5 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
06
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.2.1 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.1
Construct, display, and manipulate site terrain characteristics models 1.2.1.1
Partition site into regions with homogeneous terrain characteristics Automated partitioning of terrain map/image data
Automated partitioning of terrain database data
Software enabled manual partitioning of terrain map/image data with direct data entry
Manual partitioning of terrain map/image data with manual data entry FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Software models with GUI
Database model with query tools
Hard copy tabular data Software terrain model
Terrain database
Hard copy map with terrain shading 6 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.1
Construct, display, and manipulate site terrain characteristics models 1.2.1.1
Partition site into regions with homogeneous terrain characteristics Automated partitioning of terrain map/image data
Automated partitioning of terrain database data
Software enabled manual partitioning of terrain map/image data with direct data entry
Manual partitioning of terrain map/image data with manual data entry FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Software models with GUI
Database model with query tools
Hard copy tabular data Software terrain model
Terrain database
Hard copy map with terrain shading 6 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
07
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.2.2 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site terrain elevation models FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Terrain elevation data grid model with editor
Terrain elevation data patch model with editor
Terrain elevation database with query tools
Hardcopy terrain elevation map
Physical relief map / model 7 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site terrain elevation models FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Terrain elevation data grid model with editor
Terrain elevation data patch model with editor
Terrain elevation database with query tools
Hardcopy terrain elevation map
Physical relief map / model 7 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
08
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.2.3 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.3.2
Identify feasible ingress and egress routes 1.2.3
Construct, display, and manipulate threat dependent trafficability models 1.2.3.1
Estimate threat movement rates and expected dwell times Representation
Densely connected point-to-point network model
Sparsely connected point-to-point network model
Point-to-point movement database
Hard copy map with mensuration tools
Network model with edge rates/costs
Map tessellation with face movement rates/costs Automated calculation of point-to-point distances and rates using model data
Automated calculation of point-to-point distances and rates using database data
Direct interface with GIS system
Manual calculation and entry of distances and rates
Software enabled editing of movement rates/costs Network representation with shortest path algorithms
Database look-up
Tabular data look-up FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 8 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations 1.2.3.2
Identify feasible ingress and egress routes 1.2.3
Construct, display, and manipulate threat dependent trafficability models 1.2.3.1
Estimate threat movement rates and expected dwell times Representation
Densely connected point-to-point network model
Sparsely connected point-to-point network model
Point-to-point movement database
Hard copy map with mensuration tools
Network model with edge rates/costs
Map tessellation with face movement rates/costs Automated calculation of point-to-point distances and rates using model data
Automated calculation of point-to-point distances and rates using database data
Direct interface with GIS system
Manual calculation and entry of distances and rates
Software enabled editing of movement rates/costs Network representation with shortest path algorithms
Database look-up
Tabular data look-up FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 8 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
09
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 1.2.4 5 March 09 1.
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 1.2.4
Save, recall, and manage site terrain models and data Embedded model archive
Internal database
Off-line database 9 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent and assess site characteristics 1.2
Construct, display, and manipulate site models / analytic representations FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 1.2.4
Save, recall, and manage site terrain models and data Embedded model archive
Internal database
Off-line database 9 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
10
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.1 5 March 09 FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.1
Classify threats based on their type and attributes Manual threat classification
Intel / threat database
Explicitly model threat characteristics without classification 10 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.1
Classify threats based on their type and attributes Manual threat classification
Intel / threat database
Explicitly model threat characteristics without classification 10 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
11
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.2.1 5 March 09 2.2
Obtain and manage threat classification and quantitative threat signature data 2.2.1.
Represent threat types (e.g. personnel, wheeled vehicles, tracked vehicles, watercraft) and numbers 2.2.5
Represent threat acoustic and seismic emissions including signature dependency on threat speed 2.2.2
Represent threat physical dimensions and visual / infra-red (IR) characteristics 2.2.3
Represent threat radar cross section (RCS) 2.2.4
Represent threat radio-frequency (RF) emissions Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Software entity models
Threat data base entries
Physical "toy soldier" models 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 11 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Obtain and manage threat classification and quantitative threat signature data 2.2.1.
Represent threat types (e.g. personnel, wheeled vehicles, tracked vehicles, watercraft) and numbers 2.2.5
Represent threat acoustic and seismic emissions including signature dependency on threat speed 2.2.2
Represent threat physical dimensions and visual / infra-red (IR) characteristics 2.2.3
Represent threat radar cross section (RCS) 2.2.4
Represent threat radio-frequency (RF) emissions Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data Explicit modeling of signatures and characteristics
Database entry for signatures and characteristics
Implicitly represent in sensor-threat performance data FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Software entity models
Threat data base entries
Physical "toy soldier" models 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 11 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
12
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.3 5 March 09 2.3
Provide threat class and signature data to sensor performance models FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Integrated sensor performance model interface
Sensor performance model database query tools
Manual entry and calculation of sensor performance 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 12 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Provide threat class and signature data to sensor performance models FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Integrated sensor performance model interface
Sensor performance model database query tools
Manual entry and calculation of sensor performance 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 12 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
13
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.4 5 March 09 2.4.3
Represent mobility effects of barriers and obstacles 2.4.1
Represent threat speed as a function of the type of terrain being traversed 2.4.2
Represent prohibited terrain types which may not be traversed by specific classes / types of threat Software terrain dependent threat mobility model
Terrain dependent threat movement rate look-up tables
Manual calculation of movement rates Specify prohibitive threat / terrain dependent mobility network edge costs
Specify prohibitive threat / terrain dependent database movement costs
Maintain threat-terrain tabu list Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.4
Obtain and manage threat mobility data 13 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent mobility effects of barriers and obstacles 2.4.1
Represent threat speed as a function of the type of terrain being traversed 2.4.2
Represent prohibited terrain types which may not be traversed by specific classes / types of threat Software terrain dependent threat mobility model
Terrain dependent threat movement rate look-up tables
Manual calculation of movement rates Specify prohibitive threat / terrain dependent mobility network edge costs
Specify prohibitive threat / terrain dependent database movement costs
Maintain threat-terrain tabu list Direct specification of traffic density by type
Indexed traffic density with standard densities FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.4
Obtain and manage threat mobility data 13 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
14
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.5 5 March 09 2.5
Represent threat objectives, behaviors and operating constraints 2.5.2
Represent threat covertness posture 2.5.3
Represent threat survivability / escape objectives Include behaviors as part of threat characterization
Dynamically modify signatures and characteristics based on behavior Manually specify threat movement paths
Specify both objectives and egress points as sink nodes for two part network flow / shortest path algorithms
Specify tabu points / regions based on actual or perceived detection probabilities
Maintain threat-terrain tabu list FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Manually specify threat movement paths
Specify objectives as sink nodes for network flow / shortest path algorithms 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.5.1
Represent threat intrusion objectives 14 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Represent threat objectives, behaviors and operating constraints 2.5.2
Represent threat covertness posture 2.5.3
Represent threat survivability / escape objectives Include behaviors as part of threat characterization
Dynamically modify signatures and characteristics based on behavior Manually specify threat movement paths
Specify both objectives and egress points as sink nodes for two part network flow / shortest path algorithms
Specify tabu points / regions based on actual or perceived detection probabilities
Maintain threat-terrain tabu list FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Manually specify threat movement paths
Specify objectives as sink nodes for network flow / shortest path algorithms 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.5.1
Represent threat intrusion objectives 14 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
15
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 2.6 5 March 09 FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 2.
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.6
Provide mobility and behavior data to threat route planning, and performance assessment functions Integrated design environment with direct interfaces
Manual data import / export
Perform via database query 15 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Assess and represent projected / potential threat characteristics 2.6
Provide mobility and behavior data to threat route planning, and performance assessment functions Integrated design environment with direct interfaces
Manual data import / export
Perform via database query 15 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
16
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.1 5 March 09 3.1
Obtain, display, and manage attribute and performance data on for individual sensor system elements 3.1.5
Model/represent sensor susceptibility to environmental effects and the effect of environment on Pd, effective range and FAR 3.1.2
Model/represent sensor nominal Pd as a function of threat type/signature and terrain type 3.1.3
Model/represent sensor nominal effective range as a function of threat type/signature and terrain type Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data Incorporate directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate directly into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply environment dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Manual entry and database management of sensor specifications and performance
Software supported import of sensor specifications and performance data
Web based query of vendor sensor specs & performance 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.1.1
Maintain a list/data base of available sensors 3.1.4
Model/represent sensor nominal false alarm rate Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data 3.1.6
Model/represent sensor field-of-view (azimuth and elevation limits) Represent explicitly
Incorporate into Pd performance data 16 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez Continued on next slide<br>
Obtain, display, and manage attribute and performance data on for individual sensor system elements 3.1.5
Model/represent sensor susceptibility to environmental effects and the effect of environment on Pd, effective range and FAR 3.1.2
Model/represent sensor nominal Pd as a function of threat type/signature and terrain type 3.1.3
Model/represent sensor nominal effective range as a function of threat type/signature and terrain type Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data Incorporate directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate directly into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply environment dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS Manual entry and database management of sensor specifications and performance
Software supported import of sensor specifications and performance data
Web based query of vendor sensor specs & performance 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.1.1
Maintain a list/data base of available sensors 3.1.4
Model/represent sensor nominal false alarm rate Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data 3.1.6
Model/represent sensor field-of-view (azimuth and elevation limits) Represent explicitly
Incorporate into Pd performance data 16 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez Continued on next slide<br>
17
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.1 (cont) 5 March 09 3.1
Obtain, display, and manage attribute and performance data on for individual sensor system elements FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.1.7
Model/represent sensor scan / revisit times Represent explicitly
Incorporate into Pd models / performance data 3.1.8
Represent sensor support requirements including electrical power, communications / connectivity mechanisms, and interfaces Electronic sensor support requirement database
Hardcopy sensor support requirement tabular data 3.1.9
Represent sensor cost data including procurement, installation, and life-cycle operations and support costs Electronic sensor cost database
Hardcopy sensor cost tabular data 17 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Obtain, display, and manage attribute and performance data on for individual sensor system elements FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.1.7
Model/represent sensor scan / revisit times Represent explicitly
Incorporate into Pd models / performance data 3.1.8
Represent sensor support requirements including electrical power, communications / connectivity mechanisms, and interfaces Electronic sensor support requirement database
Hardcopy sensor support requirement tabular data 3.1.9
Represent sensor cost data including procurement, installation, and life-cycle operations and support costs Electronic sensor cost database
Hardcopy sensor cost tabular data 17 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
18
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.2.1 5 March 09 3.2
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.1
Select sensors from list of available sensors 3.2.1.1
Manually select sensors Manually select from pull down menu in development environment
Manually select by drag-and-drop in development environment
Manually select via database query 3.2.1.3
Automatically select sensors Rule based expert system
Greedy set covering algorithms
Network flow / spanning tree algorithms
Dynamic programming algorithm
Stochastic design using genetic algorithms or simulated annealing 3.2.1.2
Recommend sensors for manual selection Same as 3.2.1.1. above, but with manual acceptance and editing 18 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.1
Select sensors from list of available sensors 3.2.1.1
Manually select sensors Manually select from pull down menu in development environment
Manually select by drag-and-drop in development environment
Manually select via database query 3.2.1.3
Automatically select sensors Rule based expert system
Greedy set covering algorithms
Network flow / spanning tree algorithms
Dynamic programming algorithm
Stochastic design using genetic algorithms or simulated annealing 3.2.1.2
Recommend sensors for manual selection Same as 3.2.1.1. above, but with manual acceptance and editing 18 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
19
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.2.2 5 March 09 3.2
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.2
Position and orient sensors 3.2.2.1
Manually position and orient sensors Manually edit sensor position / orientation in development environment
Drag sensor position / orientation in development environment
Manually edit sensor position / orientation in database 3.2.2.2
Recommend sensors for manual selection Integrated into 3.2.1.3 functionality 19 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.2
Position and orient sensors 3.2.2.1
Manually position and orient sensors Manually edit sensor position / orientation in development environment
Drag sensor position / orientation in development environment
Manually edit sensor position / orientation in database 3.2.2.2
Recommend sensors for manual selection Integrated into 3.2.1.3 functionality 19 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
20
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.2.3.1 5 March 09 3.2
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.3
Assess and display sensor coverage and detection performance 3.2.3.1
Model emplaced sensor detection performance Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data 3.2.3.1.2
Determine target-to-sensor propagation path losses Automatic propagation path / path loss calculation based on terrain model / database
Database path/path loss look-up (source of database path/path loss data unclear)
Manual calculation and entry of path losses 3.2.3.1.1
Calculate sensor-to-target LOS Automatic LOS calculation based on terrain elevation grid & feature data
Automatic LOS calculation based on terrain facet & feature data
Database LOS 3.2.3.1.3
Determine sensor azimuth and elevation coverage Incorporate azimuth and elevation and field-of-view limits directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate azimuth and elevation and field-of-view limits into sensor 3.2.3.1.4
Calculate terrain type effects on sensor performance Incorporate terrain type directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate terrain type into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply terrain dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup 20 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez Continued on next slide<br>
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.3
Assess and display sensor coverage and detection performance 3.2.3.1
Model emplaced sensor detection performance Physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Sensor performance database
Hardcopy sensor performance tabular data 3.2.3.1.2
Determine target-to-sensor propagation path losses Automatic propagation path / path loss calculation based on terrain model / database
Database path/path loss look-up (source of database path/path loss data unclear)
Manual calculation and entry of path losses 3.2.3.1.1
Calculate sensor-to-target LOS Automatic LOS calculation based on terrain elevation grid & feature data
Automatic LOS calculation based on terrain facet & feature data
Database LOS 3.2.3.1.3
Determine sensor azimuth and elevation coverage Incorporate azimuth and elevation and field-of-view limits directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate azimuth and elevation and field-of-view limits into sensor 3.2.3.1.4
Calculate terrain type effects on sensor performance Incorporate terrain type directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate terrain type into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply terrain dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup 20 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez Continued on next slide<br>
21
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.2.3.1 (cont) 5 March 09 3.2
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.3
Assess and display sensor coverage and detection performance 3.2.3.1
Model emplaced sensor detection performance 3.2.3.1.6
Calculate Pd at discrete points as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environmental conditions Perform on-demand physics / engineering based Pd modeling
Pre-calculate point-to-point Pd values and populate database (ultimate data source / methodology unclear)
Manually calculate Pd performance 3.2.3.1.7
Calculate aggregate Pd for designated areas as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environmental conditions Pre-calculate area aggregate Pd values and populate database (data source unclear)
Manually calculate aggregate area Pd performance
Sample Pd data over a grid and aggregate results
Stochastically sample Pd data at random points and compute expected values 3.2.3.1.8
Calculate sensor internally and externally generated false alarm rates Physics / engineering based sensor false alarm model
Sensor false alarm database
Hardcopy sensor false alarm tabular data 3.2.3.1.5
Adjust sensor performance for environmental effects Incorporate environmental factors directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate environment into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply environment dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup 21 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Select, place, assess, and display the performance of individual sensors FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.2.3
Assess and display sensor coverage and detection performance 3.2.3.1
Model emplaced sensor detection performance 3.2.3.1.6
Calculate Pd at discrete points as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environmental conditions Perform on-demand physics / engineering based Pd modeling
Pre-calculate point-to-point Pd values and populate database (ultimate data source / methodology unclear)
Manually calculate Pd performance 3.2.3.1.7
Calculate aggregate Pd for designated areas as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environmental conditions Pre-calculate area aggregate Pd values and populate database (data source unclear)
Manually calculate aggregate area Pd performance
Sample Pd data over a grid and aggregate results
Stochastically sample Pd data at random points and compute expected values 3.2.3.1.8
Calculate sensor internally and externally generated false alarm rates Physics / engineering based sensor false alarm model
Sensor false alarm database
Hardcopy sensor false alarm tabular data 3.2.3.1.5
Adjust sensor performance for environmental effects Incorporate environmental factors directly into physics / engineering based sensor performance model
Incorporate environment into sensor performance database values / tabular data
Apply environment dependent correction factor to performance determined by model / database lookup 21 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
22
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.3.1 5 March 09 3.3
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.1
Construct sensor networks from individual sensors 3.3.1.1
Manually select and position sets of sensors Direct manual selection and placement
Manual selection and placement by rule
Manually select sensor type, with auto placement 3.3.1.3
Form sensor networks Manually connect
Shortest path / spanning tree algorithms
Bayesnet algorithms
Colored Petri Net algorithms 3.3.1.2
Heuristically select and position sets of sensors Heuristic fill-in of manually seeded sensors
Spanning tree / network flow algorithms
Dynamic programming algorithms 22 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.1
Construct sensor networks from individual sensors 3.3.1.1
Manually select and position sets of sensors Direct manual selection and placement
Manual selection and placement by rule
Manually select sensor type, with auto placement 3.3.1.3
Form sensor networks Manually connect
Shortest path / spanning tree algorithms
Bayesnet algorithms
Colored Petri Net algorithms 3.3.1.2
Heuristically select and position sets of sensors Heuristic fill-in of manually seeded sensors
Spanning tree / network flow algorithms
Dynamic programming algorithms 22 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
23
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.3.2 5 March 09 3.3
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.2 ,
Assess sensor suite coverage, detection performance and cost 3.3.2.1
Represent the integration of the outputs of multiple sensors in various architectures Signal flow diagram 3.3.2.3
Determine sensor suite fused Pd for discrete points as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environment Done via application of algorithms in 3.3.2.2 to specific sensor-target geometries 3.3.2.2
Apply alternative sensor fusion rules Voting algorithms
Primary sensor with confirmation
Bayesian classification algorithms
Colored petri-net 3.3.2.4
Determine sensor suite aggregate fused Pd for designated areas as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environment Represent area Pd by centroid point-to-point Pd
Aggregate point-to-point results over regular grid
Use expected value of Monte Carlo point-to-point results 3.3.2.5
Determine fused false alarm rate for the sensor suite for alternative sensor fusion rules Incorporate into 3.3.2.2 algorithms 23 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.2 ,
Assess sensor suite coverage, detection performance and cost 3.3.2.1
Represent the integration of the outputs of multiple sensors in various architectures Signal flow diagram 3.3.2.3
Determine sensor suite fused Pd for discrete points as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environment Done via application of algorithms in 3.3.2.2 to specific sensor-target geometries 3.3.2.2
Apply alternative sensor fusion rules Voting algorithms
Primary sensor with confirmation
Bayesian classification algorithms
Colored petri-net 3.3.2.4
Determine sensor suite aggregate fused Pd for designated areas as a function of sensor, threat, terrain, and environment Represent area Pd by centroid point-to-point Pd
Aggregate point-to-point results over regular grid
Use expected value of Monte Carlo point-to-point results 3.3.2.5
Determine fused false alarm rate for the sensor suite for alternative sensor fusion rules Incorporate into 3.3.2.2 algorithms 23 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
24
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.3.3 5 March 09 3.3
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.3
Display sensor suite coverage and detection performance 3.3.3.1
Display sensor suite Pd for specific points Interactive multi-sensor Pd display in development environment
Multi-sensor Pd database query tools
Manual calculation and display of multi-sensor Pd 3.3.3.3
Display sensor coverage by sensor and type Color coded sensor coverage map overlays in development environment
Database query sensor coverage numeric data
Database query sensor coverage plot data
Multi-layer manual map overlays 3.3.3.2
Display sensor suite Pd for designated areas Color coded Pd map overlays in development environment
Database query Pd numeric data
Database query Pd plot data
Multi-layer manual map overlays 3.3.3.4
Display sensor coverage gaps and blind spots Same as 3.3.3.3 3.3.3.5
Display sensor suite false alarm rate Sensor false alarm numeric data
Sensor false alarm frequency plots / histograms 24 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.3.3
Display sensor suite coverage and detection performance 3.3.3.1
Display sensor suite Pd for specific points Interactive multi-sensor Pd display in development environment
Multi-sensor Pd database query tools
Manual calculation and display of multi-sensor Pd 3.3.3.3
Display sensor coverage by sensor and type Color coded sensor coverage map overlays in development environment
Database query sensor coverage numeric data
Database query sensor coverage plot data
Multi-layer manual map overlays 3.3.3.2
Display sensor suite Pd for designated areas Color coded Pd map overlays in development environment
Database query Pd numeric data
Database query Pd plot data
Multi-layer manual map overlays 3.3.3.4
Display sensor coverage gaps and blind spots Same as 3.3.3.3 3.3.3.5
Display sensor suite false alarm rate Sensor false alarm numeric data
Sensor false alarm frequency plots / histograms 24 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
25
SSES Function - Form Alternatives 3.3.1 5 March 09 3.4
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance Integrated cost estimation tool in development environment
Integrated cost estimation tool in database
Automatically populated cost estimation spreadsheet
Manually populated cost estimation spreadsheet
Manual cost estimation from tabular / catalogue data 3.4.1
Estimate cost 25 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Construct, assess, and display the performance and cost of sensor suites FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance Integrated cost estimation tool in development environment
Integrated cost estimation tool in database
Automatically populated cost estimation spreadsheet
Manually populated cost estimation spreadsheet
Manual cost estimation from tabular / catalogue data 3.4.1
Estimate cost 25 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
26
Preliminary SSES Functional Decomposition 5 March 09 3.5
Optimize ESS designs FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.5.1
Store, recall, and manage ESS designs and associated performance metrics 3.5.2
Manually perform, ESS design iterations, and compare results Manual design and assessment with integrated comparison tools in development environment
Manual design and assessment with integrated comparison tools in database
Manual design and assessment with off-line comparison of designs 3.5.3
Heuristically ally perform, ESS design iterations, and compare results Automatic implementation of manually developed heuristics
Dynamic programming algorithms
Greedy set covering
Simulated annealing
Genetic algorithms Embedded database
Off-line database
Manual tabulation and management of data 26 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Optimize ESS designs FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 3
Develop ESS designs and assess technical performance 3.5.1
Store, recall, and manage ESS designs and associated performance metrics 3.5.2
Manually perform, ESS design iterations, and compare results Manual design and assessment with integrated comparison tools in development environment
Manual design and assessment with integrated comparison tools in database
Manual design and assessment with off-line comparison of designs 3.5.3
Heuristically ally perform, ESS design iterations, and compare results Automatic implementation of manually developed heuristics
Dynamic programming algorithms
Greedy set covering
Simulated annealing
Genetic algorithms Embedded database
Off-line database
Manual tabulation and management of data 26 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
27
Preliminary SSES Functional Decomposition 5 March 09 4.1
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.1
Calculate measures of effectiveness for threat ingress/egress routes 4.1.1.1
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize the time required to reach defended areas Solve movement rate weighted shortest path / network flow problem all or designated nodes 4.1.1.3
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize Pd weighted security force reaction times Solve interdiction probability weighted shortest path / network flow problem all or designated nodes 4.1.1.2
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize the probability of being detected Solve Pd weighted shortest path / network flow problem for all or designated nodes 27 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.1
Calculate measures of effectiveness for threat ingress/egress routes 4.1.1.1
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize the time required to reach defended areas Solve movement rate weighted shortest path / network flow problem all or designated nodes 4.1.1.3
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize Pd weighted security force reaction times Solve interdiction probability weighted shortest path / network flow problem all or designated nodes 4.1.1.2
Identify intruder ingress / egress route(s) that minimize the probability of being detected Solve Pd weighted shortest path / network flow problem for all or designated nodes 27 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
28
Preliminary SSES Functional Decomposition 5 March 09 4.1
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.2
Calculate measures of effectiveness for maximum vulnerability threat routes 4.1.2.1
Calculate mean and minimum site perimeter detection and interdiction probabilities Find minimum Pd and interdiction probabilities around perimeter network cycles 4.1.2.3
Calculate worst case cumulative interdiction keep-out probabilities for designated areas Find minimum path values from 4.1.1.3 Find minimum path values from 4.1.1.2 28 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez 4.1.2.2
Calculate worst case cumulative Pd for designated areas<br>
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.2
Calculate measures of effectiveness for maximum vulnerability threat routes 4.1.2.1
Calculate mean and minimum site perimeter detection and interdiction probabilities Find minimum Pd and interdiction probabilities around perimeter network cycles 4.1.2.3
Calculate worst case cumulative interdiction keep-out probabilities for designated areas Find minimum path values from 4.1.1.3 Find minimum path values from 4.1.1.2 28 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez 4.1.2.2
Calculate worst case cumulative Pd for designated areas<br>
29
Preliminary SSES Functional Decomposition 5 March 09 4.1
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.3
Display site protection measures of effectiveness 4.1.3.1
Display minimum Pd threat ingress / egress routes Find minimum Pd and interdiction probabilities around perimeter network cycles 4.1.3.3
Display site sensor cumulative detection probability coverage maps Minimum path value from 4.1.1.3 4.1.3.2
Display minimum response time threat ingress / egress routes Minimum path value from 4.1.1.2 29 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Assess and display ESS operational performance against customer site protection requirements using analytic methods FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.1.3
Display site protection measures of effectiveness 4.1.3.1
Display minimum Pd threat ingress / egress routes Find minimum Pd and interdiction probabilities around perimeter network cycles 4.1.3.3
Display site sensor cumulative detection probability coverage maps Minimum path value from 4.1.1.3 4.1.3.2
Display minimum response time threat ingress / egress routes Minimum path value from 4.1.1.2 29 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
30
Preliminary SSES Functional Decomposition 5 March 09 4.2
Assess ESS total cost FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.2.1
Estimate ESS total ownership costs taking into account all procurement, installation, facilities and operating costs Integrated total cost estimation tool in development environment
Integrated total cost estimation tool in database
Automatically populated total cost estimation spreadsheet
Manually populated total cost estimation spreadsheet
Manual total cost estimation from tabular / catalogue data 30 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>
Assess ESS total cost FUNCTIONS ALTERNATIVE FORMS 4
Assess ESS operational performance 4.2.1
Estimate ESS total ownership costs taking into account all procurement, installation, facilities and operating costs Integrated total cost estimation tool in development environment
Integrated total cost estimation tool in database
Automatically populated total cost estimation spreadsheet
Manually populated total cost estimation spreadsheet
Manual total cost estimation from tabular / catalogue data 30 Anderson, Beres, Shaw, Valadez<br>