AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this

AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this
1 / 1
AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 1 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 2 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 3 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 4 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 5 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 6 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 7 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 8 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 9 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 10 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 11 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 12 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 13 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 14 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 15 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 16 of 17 AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this - slide 17 of 17
AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this course, the author offers a new definition AI is the study of the mechanisms underlying intelligent behavior through the construction and evaluation of artifacts designed to enact those

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
AI Redefined Given what we have studied in this course, the author offers a new definition
AI is the study of the mechanisms underlying intelligent behavior through the construction and evaluation of artifacts designed to enact those mechanisms
There are several noteworthy things about this definition
we only commit to intelligent behavior
evaluation is a critical component for the definition – we are no longer relying just on the Turing Test, but instead we look to evaluate the performance of any AI system – although the definition does not tell us how to perform that evaluation
the emphasis here is on artifacts – working systems<br>
02
AI as a Field From the definition, we see that AI is (or should be) less concerned about a central or single theory of mind
it is more empirically targeted – working systems
Thus, AI is an engineering pursuit
the creation of working systems
The need for evaluation makes AI a science
while creating systems is well and good, without analyzing the systems to understand why they work or do not work, AI will be working in a void
This definition denotes a paradigm shift away from
philosophy of mind – we do not need to study mind to create mind, human mind might help with models but the formal studies found in philosophy have done little to help
psychology of the human mind – we may gain some understanding of what to do through experimentation but again, this sort of pursuit has led AI astray<br>
03
PSS Hypothesis Redux Recall in our first lecture, we considered the PSS Hypothesis – a PSS has the necessary and sufficient means to exhibit intelligent action
the focus on this hypothesis led AI to research
use of symbols to model the world
design of search strategies to apply operators on the given symbols
use of heuristics to guide the search
the use of an empirical approach to research – build (construct) and test to prove your point
While this has helped form a basis for AI, it has also misled AI as much as earlier reliance on philosophy and psychology
do we need symbolic knowledge? neural networks show otherwise
do we need heuristic search strategies? model based approaches (whether structural/functional, Bayesian or HMM based seem to indicate less need for this)<br>