Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL

Published  . 0 views
↓ Download
Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL
1 / 1
Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 1 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 2 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 3 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 4 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 5 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 6 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 7 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 8 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 9 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 10 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 11 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 12 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 13 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 14 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 15 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 16 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 17 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 18 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 19 of 20 Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL - slide 20 of 20
Description: Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL COMPETENCIES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH Louis C. Gapenski, PhD Michael E. Morris, MPH, MPA, CPH Peggy A. Honoré, DHA This research was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 1

Related Topics

Download Presentation

"Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

slide1. Are we getting the job done? TEACHING FINANCIAL COMPETENCIES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH Louis C. Gapenski, PhD

Michael E. Morris, MPH, MPA, CPH

Peggy A. Honoré, DHA

This research was supported by a grant
from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 1<br>
slide2. AGENDA Research Context
Research Findings
Introduction, purpose, and approach
Setting and workforce
Finance competencies
Current finance content
Amount
Topics
Unique content requirement
Recommendations
Panelist Response
Audience Response
Conclusion 2<br>
slide3. RESEARCH CONTEXT Today’s presentation is one part of an effort funded by RWJ to advance the practice of finance within the field of public health.
Systems thinking perspective applied.
Overall effort has four main thrusts:
Improve strategic thinking and analysis
Increase relationship building
Improve public health systems organization
Increase attention to new knowledge 3<br>
slide4. RESEARCH CONTEXT The portion of the overall effort most relevant to the research presented today includes:
Public Health Finance Institute
Public health finance website
Ratio analysis methodologies
Ratio analysis benchmarks
Sustainability (risk) index development
Redesign of public health finance courses
Development of finance teaching materials 4<br>
slide5. INTRODUCTION Public health finance is defined as “acquiring, managing, and utilizing scarce resources to improve the health of populations.”
As the scarcity of financial resources increases, the role of finance increases in importance.
Evidence indicates that management as a whole is lacking in finance skills and tools.
Academic institutions have a significant opportunity to contribute to workforce finance competency. 5<br>
slide6. PURPOSE The purpose of our research is to:
Assess the adequacy of current finance education in public health (primarily MPH) programs.
Make recommendations for change.
Note that academic programs address long-term knowledge needs and must be in concert with:
Continuing professional development
On-the-job training 6<br>
slide7. APPROACH Identify the finance competencies required by public health managers.
Review current educational program content.
Ask this question: Does current content provide the KSAs necessary to meet the required competencies?
If not, what should be done? 7<br>
slide8. SETTING AND WORKFORCE Public health services are provided at the:
National level.
State level.
Local level.
Finance activities are carried out by both finance specialists and generalist managers.
Most generalist managers are not trained in management but are professionals from other fields who have managerial responsibilities.
Thus, finance education must span many disciplines and be broad in scope. 8<br>
slide9. FINANCE COMPETENCIES Over the past 20 years several studies have been made to identify public health finance competencies.
The most recent (and comprehensive) work was published last year by Honoré and Costich.
Three domains
Financial management, analysis, and assessment
Organizational and program planning and policy development
Administrative and general skills
Most relevant domain for finance education is the first one.
Competencies are listed for each domain. 9<br>
slide10. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT - AMOUNT In 2008, there were:
22,500 students in College of Public Health MPH programs.
Of these, 3,285 (14.6%) were in management related concentrations.
The goals of MPH programs are most similar to MHA and MPA programs. To judge the adequacy of the amount of content, the finance requirements of the top 20 programs in these three fields were compared. 10<br>
slide11. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT - AMOUNT 11<br>
slide12. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT – TOPICS Review of the syllabi of the top 20 MPH programs indicates that current offerings overwhelmingly reflect traditional MHA content.
Thus, in general, MPH finance courses lack material related to:
Public sector organizations.
Finance functions unique to public health. 12<br>
slide13. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT – TOPICS Course content was compared to the identified finance competencies.
Many weaknesses exist.
Some at the competency level.
But more at the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) level. For example, syllabus might include ratio analysis, but MHA-oriented courses typically focus on financial and operating ratios relevant to private sector organizations (often not-for-profit hospitals). 13<br>
slide14. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT – TOPICS Competency differences include:
Grant acquisition and management
Disaster budgeting
Integrating budgeting with strategic and financial planning
Competencies that relate finance to the perspective and context of public health 14<br>
slide15. CURRENT FINANCE CONTENT – TOPICS KSA differences, which mostly reflect differences between public and private sector management, include:
Financial statement format and interpretation
Ratio analysis
Budgeting
Capital financing
Capital budgeting (program) analysis 15<br>
slide16. UNIQUE CONTENT REQUIREMENT Our review indicates that current public health finance courses do not provide:
All students with a basic understanding of finance principles.
Management concentration students with content that sufficiently reflects the uniqueness of public health.
Findings supported by work at St. Louis University
Matched public health competencies against current (MHA) course competencies.
Found that only 63% of the public health competencies were covered in the course. 16<br>
slide17. RECOMMENDATIONS All public health students, regardless of concentration, should take at least one finance course.
Introductory in nature
Should include both accounting and financial management
All public health management students should take at least two finance courses.
The introductory course
A second course that focuses on application
Both courses must be dedicated to public health finance. 17<br>
slide18. PANELIST RESPONSE Comments From the Panelists 18<br>
slide19. AUDIENCE RESPONSE Comments From the Audience 19<br>
slide20. CONCLUSION Our thanks to the panelists and audience for your thoughtful comments! 20<br>