Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and

Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and
1 / 1
Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 1 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 2 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 3 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 4 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 5 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 6 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 7 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 8 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 9 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 10 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 11 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 12 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 13 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 14 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 15 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 16 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 17 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 18 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 19 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 20 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 21 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 22 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 23 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 24 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 25 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 26 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 27 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 28 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 29 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 30 of 31 Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and - slide 31 of 31
Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and Traditional Nuclear Reactors in Water Desalination Cogeneration Applications Prof. Magy M. Kandil Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA) Introduction Desalination Process The Desalination Plant

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
Comparison between Small Modular Reactors and Traditional Nuclear Reactors in Water Desalination Cogeneration Applications Prof. Magy M. Kandil Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA)<br>
02
Introduction
Desalination Process
The Desalination Plant Systems
Nuclear Desalination
The Integrated Nuclear Desalination Plant
Small Versus Large Reactors
Economical and Design Aspects of SMR Vs Large Reactor Coupling and Plants Integration for SMR-DP
The ND feasibility of SMART and CAREM25 Reactors
Technical-economic analyses using DEEP software
Safety of Small Modular Reactors in Desalination Processes
Conclusions Overview<br>
03
Introduction Nuclear energy is increasingly utilized in various cogeneration applications, including seawater desalination, hydrogen production, district heating, and diverse industrial processes. All desalination methods require both heat and electricity, varying in their demands based on capacity, technology, and operational specifics.
Nuclear Desalination has gained recognition for its reliability, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and safety aspects, making it one of the most promising methods for freshwater production.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) have emerged as a focal point for nuclear industry developers, showing significant advancements in recent years. The design of SMRs is particularly advantageous for cogenerating electricity and clean water due to:
Enhanced Safety: SMRs are designed with advanced safety features that reduce risks associated with nuclear operations.
Improved Affordability: The modular nature of SMRs allows for reduced capital costs and easier financing.
Deployment Flexibility: SMRs can be deployed in various locations and scaled according to demand, making them versatile for different applications.
Cost-Effective Approach: The overall lifecycle costs of SMRs are competitive, especially when factoring in their ability to provide both power and fresh water.<br>