Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations

Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations
1 / 1
Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 1 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 2 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 3 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 4 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 5 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 6 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 7 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 8 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 9 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 10 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 11 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 12 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 13 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 14 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 15 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 16 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 17 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 18 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 19 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 20 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 21 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 22 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 23 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 24 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 25 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 26 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 27 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 28 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 29 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 30 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 31 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 32 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 33 of 34 Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations - slide 34 of 34
Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations MBTOC Cochairs: Mohamed Besri Michelle Marcotte Marta Pizano Ian Porter 24th MOP - Geneva Montreal Protocol, MOP-24, 12-16 November, Geneva Trends in CUNs The number of CUNs from non A(5)

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
Critical Use Nominations:
Final Recommendations

MBTOC Cochairs:
Mohamed Besri
Michelle Marcotte
Marta Pizano
Ian Porter 24th MOP - Geneva Montreal Protocol, MOP-24, 12-16 November, Geneva<br>
02
Trends in CUNs The number of CUNs from non A(5) Parties have diminished greatly, from over 116 in 2005 to eight in 2012.

After the OEWG Parties asked MBTOC to
re-review 5 CUNs.<br>
03
Trends in Total Amount (t) of MB Approved (2010-2013) or Nominated for Critical Uses in 2014. Overall, CUNs continue to fall.
Only 3 non A5 Parties continue to submit nominations.
Japan ceased CUNs in this round. tonnes<br>