Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case
Author : stefany-barnette | Published Date : 2025-06-23
Description: Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces A Case Study of Public Finance Management in Malawi Scope Introduction Methodology Research Findings Conclusion Introduction Public finance management nexus with good governance paradigm Little or
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download
Presentation The PPT/PDF document
"Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case" is the property of its rightful owner.
Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only,
and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all
copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of
this agreement.
Transcript:Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case:
Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case Study of Public Finance Management in Malawi Scope Introduction Methodology Research Findings Conclusion Introduction Public finance management nexus with good governance paradigm Little or no research on security governance and public finance management in the Armed Forces in Malawi Methodology Face to face interviews with Military Officers, Members of Parliament, Parliamentary Staff and Ministry of Defence. Used historical institutionalism theory to appreciate the broader policy trajectory and historical environment of security governance in Malawi i.e. Public expenditure and accountability. Historical institutionalism primarily describes the reasons for the persistent trajectory of given policy decisions and how some occasional changes occur. Research findings Institutional framework for security governance and financial oversight in the Armed Forces: MOD Military has an extensive latitude in its budgeting and procurement process, thereby weakening any prudent public finance management. The Military regulates its own financial prudence through the office of Inspector General (IG) The IG office is not independent as it operates within the Office of the Commander of the Defence Force. This institutional arrangement therefore weakens the regulatory role of the Inspector General’s office. Governance dilemma and financial accountability challenges within the MOD. The Head of State in Malawi has at different occasions served as the Minister of Defence since 2004 causing security governance dilemma. Section 3 of the Public Finance Act stipulates that the minister is responsible to cabinet and national assembly (b) ensuring adequate procedures, internal controls and guidelines exist for the use of public money and public resources; and (c) the compliance by the Ministry of Finance with its responsibilities under this Act. Section 4 stipulates that the minister is responsible for (c) the supervision of the finances, assets and liabilities of the state so as to ensure that a full accounting is made to the National Assembly of all transactions involving public moneys or disposition of public resources; (c) the oversight of finances of the statutory bodies. While the Deputy minister appears in his stead, this is excessive delegation of authority, and section 5(c) of the PFM Act 2003 stipulates that the responsibilities of the minister under this Act shall not be derogated merely by his having exercised his power of delegation under this section. The Republic of Malawi constitution stipulates that “the ultimate responsibility of the defence forces of Malawi shall vest in the President as commander in chief.” It further states that