Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case Study of Public Finance Management in Malawi Scope Introduction Methodology Research Findings Conclusion Introduction Public finance management nexus with good governance paradigm Little or
"Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to
download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it
on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright
notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this
agreement.
Presentation Transcript
01
Executive Supremacy and the Armed Forces: A Case Study of Public Finance Management in Malawi<br>
02
Scope Introduction
Methodology
Research Findings
Conclusion<br>
03
Introduction Public finance management nexus with good governance paradigm
Little or no research on security governance and public finance management in the Armed Forces in Malawi<br>
04
Methodology Face to face interviews with Military Officers, Members of Parliament, Parliamentary Staff and Ministry of Defence.
Used historical institutionalism theory to appreciate the broader policy trajectory and historical environment of security governance in Malawi i.e. Public expenditure and accountability.
Historical institutionalism primarily describes the reasons for the persistent trajectory of given policy decisions and how some occasional changes occur.<br>
05
Research findings Institutional framework for security governance and financial oversight in the Armed Forces: MOD
Military has an extensive latitude in its budgeting and procurement process, thereby weakening any prudent public finance management.
The Military regulates its own financial prudence through the office of Inspector General (IG)
The IG office is not independent as it operates within the Office of the Commander of the Defence Force. This institutional arrangement therefore weakens the regulatory role of the Inspector General’s office.<br>
06
Governance dilemma and financial accountability challenges within the MOD. The Head of State in Malawi has at different occasions served as the Minister of Defence since 2004 causing security governance dilemma.
Section 3 of the Public Finance Act stipulates that
the minister is responsible to cabinet and national assembly (b) ensuring adequate procedures, internal controls and guidelines exist for the use of public money and public resources; and (c) the compliance by the Ministry of Finance with its responsibilities under this Act.<br>
07
Section 4 stipulates that
the minister is responsible for (c) the supervision of the finances, assets and liabilities of the state so as to ensure that a full accounting is made to the National Assembly of all transactions involving public moneys or disposition of public resources; (c) the oversight of finances of the statutory bodies.
While the Deputy minister appears in his stead, this is excessive delegation of authority,
and section 5(c) of the PFM Act 2003 stipulates that the responsibilities of the minister under this Act shall not be derogated merely by his having exercised his power of delegation under this section.<br>
08
The Republic of Malawi constitution stipulates that
“the ultimate responsibility of the defence forces of Malawi shall vest in the President as commander in chief.” It further states that any power conferred on the President, by the constitution, shall only be exercised on the recommendations of the Defence Force Council, which shall include the Minister of Defence, Secretary to the office of the President and Cabinet and the high command of the Defence Force. The Republic of Malawi Constitution, 1995: 71.<br>
09
The Legislature Members of parliament little fiscal expertise; and lack of specialized knowledge in defence budget.
Defence and Security Committee experience on public expenditure oversight on secretive national security operations is absent due to lack of security clearance to handle such sensitive information.
Lack of professional parliamentary staff with sufficient knowledge and expertise of the military’s institutional requirements and expenditure of public money.<br>
10
The historical context of Public Finance Management in the Armed Forces The policies adopted by all post-independence Heads of State reduced legislative powers and created executive dominance, resulting in lack of effective oversight of the military public expenditure.
The Armed Forces restructuring and procurement of military assets/ the public expenditure has always been kept under wraps of the Presidency and the military without a security cleared Defence and Security Committee.
The President and Defence Commanders’ relationship i.e. firing and control.<br>
