GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms.
1 / 1

GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms.

Author : danika-pritchard | Published Date : 2025-08-06

Description: GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms Sarah Harrop Ms Emily Foglia Ms Christie Quaranta Center for Army Analysis Problem Statement Measures of Success Stationing Background Literature Review Findings Project Scope Assumptions

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Transcript:GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms.:
GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms. Sarah Harrop Ms. Emily Foglia Ms. Christie Quaranta Center for Army Analysis Problem Statement Measures of Success Stationing Background Literature Review & Findings Project Scope Assumptions Challenges Data Collection Methodology Verification and Validation Economic Impact Tool Demonstration Agenda 08 May 2015 2 Develop an economic impact tool (EIT) that will capture the impact of realigning or closing Army installations on the surrounding community Measures of success: Include multiple factors that will capture the economic impact Consider differences due to the location of the installation Use authoritative databases Ensure developed EIT is validated Tool is Army-owned Provide well documented methodology and tool Problem Statement 08 May 2015 3 The Department of Defense (DoD) and the Army need to make strategic and day-to-day stationing decisions due to excess, unwanted, or unneeded facilities, fiscal constraints, and force reduction requirements Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) After World War II and the Korean conflict, DoD started downsizing its inventory BRAC rounds were conducted in 1988, 1991, 1993, 1995, and 2005 Congress mandates 8 criteria be considered when evaluating a BRAC scenario Criterion 6: The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military installations Tool developed contained only one factor and used commercially-owned software CAA lacks an updated, robust tool to measure the economic impact Stationing Background 08 May 2015 4 Stationing Methodology 08 May 2015 Criteria 1 – 4 - MVA Model OSAF Scenario Development Criterion 5 - COBRA Final COAs and/or Recommendations 1 2 3 5 Criterion 6 - Econ Impact Criterion 7 - QOL Criterion 8 - Environ. Impact 6 4 Stationing Action Initiation COBRA – Cost of Base Realignment and Closure COA – Course of Action MVA – Military Value Analysis OSAF- Optimal Stationing of Army Forces QOL- Quality of Life 5 BRAC05 Economic Impact Joint Process Action Team Report Assign installations to their region Calculated multipliers to estimate employment changes resulting from BRAC actions Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Economic Impact Forecast System Utilized economic base analysis and location quotient (LQ) technique Estimates employment, sales volume, income, and population changes due to stationing actions The Role of Economic Base Analysis in Regional Economic Development, Froesche, R A Comparison of Alternative Methods for Generating Economic Base Multipliers, Bloomquist, Kim Literature Review and Findings 08 May 2015 6 All major US Army Installations in the Continental United States (CONUS) plus Alaska and

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"GMU OR 699 Economic Impact Tool 08 May 2015 Ms."The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Presentations

V-JWED29-Apr-15THU30-Apr-15DAYDATEFPWJTCRGRCPTHU1-Oct-152-Oct-15V-L/BV ACADEMIC CALANDER 2015 Borrowed from Brent Grade Projections The Economic and Community Impact of the University of Wash GMU OR 699 Economic and social impact The Impact of Cement Manufacturing on Economic Growth in the Cape Fear Region GMU-SIM-JCS, January 2010 Alfalfa Weevil Economic Impact 02F00AAB6CRV8WQ20162B102F6A02RNM00A0A1067x 10699G0A1FFA61BCB2 Economic impact of north Carolina On-Campus Employment For J-1 Students