Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches

Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches
1 / 1
Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 1 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 2 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 3 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 4 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 5 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 6 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 7 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 8 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 9 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 10 of 11 Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches - slide 11 of 11
Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches for the Allocation of ERs and CA Setting the Scene 1: Electricity System in Southern Africa Southern African Development Community (SADC): 15 countries Southern African Power Pool (SAPP) 9

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
Regional Cooperation under Article 6 Approaches for the Allocation of ERs and CA<br>
02
Setting the Scene 1: Electricity System in Southern Africa Southern African Development Community (SADC): 15 countries
Southern African Power Pool (SAPP)
9 countries highly interconnected (Botswana, DRC, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, Mozambique, RSA, Zambia, Zimbabwe) / 3 countries member to SAPP but not connected yet (Angola, Malawi, Tanzania)
Joint SAPP expansion plan, approved by all utilities and all Ministries of Energy of all SAPP member states
Three scenarios: i) national expansion, ii) high regional integration (approved) and iii) high RE
Take away:
Regional integration is economically cost effective (savings of USD 34.3 billion up to 2040)!
Regional power system is a reality! How about regional climate planning? No 2<br>
03
Setting the Scene 2: Joint Emission Factor for the Power System Joint Grid Emission Factor (specific emission factor in tCO2/MWh) for the SAPP power system
signed by all nine countries
approved by UNFCCC as Standardized Baseline / but not reflected in national GHGIs

CDM world: Possible to generate CERs in a country where the national GHG inventory reports no emissions for ‘stationary power generation’ under IPCC Sector ‘energy’
True for imports and exports:
Eswatini (net importer, clean national power system), additional national generation from PV plant would reduce imports of GHG emission intensive electricity from the PES;
DRC (net exporter, clean national power system), additional national hydropower generation / hydro-electricity export replaces GHG emission intensive electricity generation in the joint PES

Paris world: How to do corresponding adjustments? No 3<br>