SURGICAL STRIKE NOW REQUIRED TO PREVENT MISUSE OF

One person used to file about one hundred RTI-applications per week at Delhi Fire Service, evidently for mischievous objectives.
But a proper training provided to their officers arming them with Supreme Court verdict in case ‘CBSE vs Aditya Bandopadhyaya’ resulted in preventing him playing mischief with the RTI Act.
A person had been filing RTI petitions of nuisance nature in name of his friends/relations based in different cities of the country from the same post-office bearing the same format and signature signed by the same pen!
Since there is no provision of asking for an Identity Proof of RTI applicant, concerned public-authority can do nothing but wasting precious man-hours, resources, postal and stationery costs in dealing with such RTI petitions.
It is also experienced that certain mischievous persons even misuse name of known activists by sending such complaints under their names with forged signatures, which causes unnecessary embarrassments Some peculiar cases of misuse of RTI Act by applicants<br>

CVC issued circular dated 10.03.2017 to all the CVOs of various public-authorities about CIC-verdict dated 25.06.2014 in case ‘Shri Ramesh Chand Jain vs DTC’ in which CVC has asked all its CVOs to bring to notice of CPIOs/Appellate Authorities of their organisations about the verdict. CVC had to issue such directions to CVOs only because of detection of large-scale misuse of RTI Act having been noted by it. The said CIC-verdict observed as under:
Even a single repetition of RTI application would demand the valuable time of the public authority, first appellate authority and if it also reaches second appeal, that of the Commission, which time could have been spent to hear another appeal or answer another application or perform other public duty.
Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier responded will he an obstruction to flow of information and defeats the purpose of the RTI Act.” CVC directive to CVOs on misuse of RTI Act<br>

Guide public-authorities through publicised verdicts on misuse of RTI Act
There are many CIC-verdicts passing stringent strictures on misuse of RTI Act, subsequently endorsed by Courts.
Central Information Commission, State information Commissions and Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) should compile all such verdicts on their websites so as to educate those handling RTI applications
A person filing indiscriminate RTI applications sometimes about 50 in a day was prevented from doing so after strong strictures were passed against him by Hon’ble Central Information Commission Role of Information Commissions and DoPT to tackle the misuse of RTI Act<br>

Some public-authorities are in habit of misusing section 6(3) of RTI Act by unnecessarily transferring RTI petitions to hundreds/thousands offices even though information might exist with the transferring public-authority itself.
Example 1 - Union Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) in the earlier UPA regime had adopted clever tactics to avoid uncomfortable RTI queries like status of government-bungalows like number 6, Krishna Menon Marg (New Delhi) and change in bungalow-number to 6-A from 8 at Krishna Menon Marg (New Delhi) etc perhaps because such queries directly related to personalities like the then Lok Sabha Speaker and a former Prime Minister.
CPWD responses usually never carried names and contact-details of CPIOs and Appellate Authorities.
Example 2 - Income Tax Department (Headquarters) transferred an RTI petition to thousands of Income Tax Offices across the country where information was sought about those Non-Government-Organisations (NGOs) and political parties which are entitled for tax-exemption under Income Tax Act.
Most of the Income Tax Offices replied that information relating to them as ‘NIL’. Abuse of RTI Act by public-authorities<br>

1) Increase RTI fees
Increasing RTI fees uniformly to rupees fifty with provision to provide first twenty copied pages free-of-cost.
It will be economical in terms of man-hours spent and postal-charges for both the public-authorities and genuine RTI applicants and in demanding and remitting copying-charges.
Charges have not been changed for more than one decade
2) ID proof should be compulsory with RTI applications
Misuse of filing RTI petitions in name of others or with non-existing persons has also become quite common.
RTI Act does not permit those ex-Indians who later took nationality of some other country
Provision of compulsorily attaching copy of ID proof should be there for filing complaints in government-departments to prevent filing complaints in name of others. Four-way strategy to tackle misuse of RTI Act<br>

3) Issue RTI stamps
CIC’s repeated recommendations for introducing exclusive RTI stamps in several denominations
Most popular mode of remitting RTI fees is through postal-orders which cost heavily to public-exchequer with handling cost of rupees 39.99 per postal-order, apart from banking-cost in clearing-operations
4) Accept RTI applications at all post-offices
Indian postal-department presently provides facility of receiving post-free RTI applications addressed to central public-authorities at just about 4500 post-offices.
This facility should be available at all post-offices in the country which are about 160000
Providing such a facility will prove to be much more effective and useful than on-line filing of RTI petitions in a country where most people especially in rural India are still not using internet.<br>

Disposals of RTI applications will be much-much faster even at stage of Information Commissions with frivolous petitions being largely eliminated.
Huge man-hours and other resources like stationery, postal-charges in handling mischievous or frivolous RTI-applications account for unnecessary burden on public-exchequers funded by hard-earned money of tax-payers, both at central and state levels will reduce.
Since no quantum of training for handling RTI petitions can be sufficient to such large number of PIOs/public-authorities and others handing RTI petitions, effective ways to check misuse of RTI Act may be possible , which may ultimately be beneficial for genuine RTI-applicants. Outcomes of Four-way strategy<br>

THANK YOU<br>