/
4 th  International Conference on 4 th  International Conference on

4 th International Conference on - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2019-11-23

4 th International Conference on - PPT Presentation

4 th International Conference on Agriculture and Horticulture July 1315 2015 Beijing China The Impact of Phosphorus Fertilizers on Heavy Metals Content of Soils and Vegetables Grown on Selected Farms in Jordan ID: 767106

heavy metals 002 jordan metals heavy jordan 002 farms soil selected chemical plant fertilizers clay analysis extractable materials loam

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "4 th International Conference on" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

4th International Conference onAgriculture and HorticultureJuly 13-15, 2015 Beijing, China The Impact of Phosphorus Fertilizers on Heavy Metals Content of Soils and Vegetables Grown on Selected Farms in Jordan Dr. Asad AlKhader

OUTLINEINTRODUCTIONSTUDY OBJECTIVE MATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONSRECOMMENDATIONS

INTRODUCTION Phosphorous (P) is considered an essential nutrient element for plant growth and development. P deficiency constitutes a major limiting factor in the crop production of the world (George and Richardson, 2008).

INTRODUCTION Heavy metals like cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) metalloid have been found in P fertilizers and are considered the most important of health concern (Minnesota Department of Health, 1999). These elements are regarded toxic and classified as carcinogenic ( Mensah , et al., 2009; Oymen et al., 2015).

INTRODUCTIONCadmium is a highly mobile metal and found to accumulate in plants in large amounts without showing phytotoxic symptoms. Therefore, it is considered as one of the most serious heavy metals to human health (Moustakas et al., 2001; Kirkham, 2006; Al-Faiyz, et al., 2007).

INTRODUCTIONMoreover, Cd tends to accumulate in vegetables more than other heavy metals; For this reason Cd can enter the food chain by ingestion of vegetables (Podar and Ramsey, 2005).

INTRODUCTION Recent studies, also, have demonstrated that As and other toxic heavy metals like Cd and Pb were responsible for causing a chronic kidney disease, known as toxic nephropathy, in contaminated areas in Siri Lanka ( Jayasumara et al., 2015).

INTRODUCTION Also, poisoning by Pb in Nigeria killed more than 500 children, and left thousands in severe health conditions in 2010 (Galadima and Garba , 2012; Agwaramgbo et al., 2014).

Children poisoned by lead (Pb) from Gummi,Zamfara state, Nigeria (Galadima and Garba, 2012).

INTRODUCTION On the other hand, local research works have indicated that heavy metals like Cd and Pb are found in phosphate rock of Jordan which is used primarily in the production of P fertilizers ( Javied , et al., 2009; Alkhader and Abu Rayyan , 2014).

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the possible contamination of soils, plants, P fertilizers and irrigation water in selected intensively cultivated areas in Jordan, with heavy metals (Cd and Pb) and As metalloid.

ObjectiveLettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) showed a high capability to absorb Cd from the soil and considered an accumulator for heavy metals in its leave tissues (Smical, et al., 2008; Yargholi et al., 2008).

ObjectiveTherefore, lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)was used as an indicator plant for potential heavy metals contamination of vegetables.

MATERIALS AND METHODSFarms SelectionThirteen (13)farms from three (3)locations characterized by intensive agricultural activities in Jordan (Jordan Valley, Alyadoda , and Jarash ) were selected for sampling : soil, plant, fertilizers and irrigation water During the spring/summer period of the 2010 year.

The agricultural sites of heavy metals investigation in the conducted survey in Jordan 1 2 4 Jordan Amman Capital 3

MATERIALS AND METHODSSoil Three (3) composite soil samples (0-20 cm depth) were collected from each selected farm for some chemical and physical analysis. Soil 0.005 M DTPA-extractable Cd and Pb , and 0.5 M NaHCO 3 -extractable As were determined ( bioavailable to plant). Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (Model Varian, Spectr . AA-200, Australia) was used in these determinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODSFertilizerLevels of heavy metals (Cd and Pb) and metalloid (As) were determined in ten (10) P fertilizers which are widely used in the investigated farms.

MATERIALS AND METHODSIrrigation Water Chemical analysis was done for the irrigation water samples collected from the investigated farms to determine pH, EC, major cations and anions (routine analysis)Cadmium, Pb and As concentrations were, also, measured.

MATERIALS AND METHODSPlantLettuce plant (iceberg type) samples were collected from three (3) farms which were cultivated with this crop. Three ( 3 ) plants from each farm were used to make representative samples. The plant contents of Cadmium , Pb and As concentrations were measured using AAS. Measurements were taken in triplicate and averaged.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Chemical and physical analysis for the soils Table 1: Average values for some chemical and physical properties of the soils (0-20 cm depth) from the selected farms in the conducted survey in the year 2010. Farm no. Location pH Salinity Total N Available Extractable Texture P K Cd Pb As dS /m % ppm 1 Middle Jordan Valley 8.1 2.76 0.08 23.1 572.9 0.028 0.62 9.04 Clay 2 8.0 1.26 0.22 130.4 730.9 0.066 0.78 7.45 3 8.2 24.2 0.12 63.7 461.3 0.158 0.84 16.41 4 8.1 3.47 0.14 98.4 535.7 0.058 0.92 0.69 5 8.2 2.05 0.07 87 284.7 0.024 0.56 12.56 Clay loam 6 8.3 1.96 0.12 97.6 479.9 0.044 0.74 4.99 7 8.2 2.28 0.08 70.6 294 0.014 0.46 2.69 Sandy clay loam 8 8.1 5.72 0.06 42.9 396.2 0.136 0.72 7.92 Clay loam 9 8.2 1.52 0.08 68.4 275.4 0.022 1.9 17.77 Sandy clay loam 10 Southern Jordan Valley/cultivated 8.7 27.3 0.1 84.9 684.4 0.028 0.4 16.24 Sandy clay loam Southern Jordan Valley/uncultivated 8.5 32.8 0.02 4.9 331.1 0.01 0.64 0.85 Sandy loam 11 Al- Yadoda 7.9 1.13 0.14 81.4 572.9 0.216 0.84 2.46 Clay 12 8.3 0.65 0.09 33.1 377.6 0.11 0.9 1.08 13 Jarash 8.0 1.95 0.08 17.9 563.6 0.024 0.52 0.75 Clay

Figure 1a: The correlation between soil available P and soil DTPA- extractable Cd in the selected farms.

Figure 1b: The correlation between soil available P and soil DTPA- extractable Pb in the selected farms.

Figure 1c: The correlation between soil available P and soil NaHCO3-extractable As in the selected farms.

Chemical analysis for fertilizersFertilizerNutrientsHeavy metals* N P 2 O 5 K 2 O Cd Pb As % ppm Urea Phosphate 17.4 46.7 0 2.76 0.4 13.74 DAP 18.2 44.0 0 7.9 2.1 2. 8 MAP 12.3 61.1 0 0.5 1.8 43.0 SSP 0 17.4 0 6.1 2.2 5.5 NPK 13 40 13 1.02 5.8 0.26 NPK 15 15 30 0.7 6 3.77 NPK 30 10100.423.47.85NPK205100.651.85NPK1919190.865.616.36NPK168240.88.20.70 Table 2: Average values of some nutrients and heavy metals contents for some selected chemical fertilizers usually used by farmers in Jordan. * The critical limits of Cd , Pb and As in chemical fertilizers are 20, 500, and 75 ppm , respectively, according to the Canadian Standards (Heckman, 2006).

Chemical analysis for the irrigation water Farm no.LocationpHEC * Cd * Pb * As dS /m ( ppm ) (ppb) 1 Middle Jordan Valley 7.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 2 7.3 1.4 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 3 7.2 3.4 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 4 8.3 2.3 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 5 8.4 1.7 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 6 8.4 1.7 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 7 8.3 1.7 <0.002 <0.01 < 0.2 8 8.4 1.7 <0.002<0.01< 0.298.31.8<0.002<0.01< 0.210Southern Jordan Valley8.41.8<0.002<0.01< 0.211Al-Yadoda7.60.9<0.002<0.01< 0.2127.70.7 <0.002<0.01< 0.213 Jarash 7.7 0.8<0.002<0.01< 0.2 Table 3: Results of chemical analysis for the irrigation water samples from the selected farms. * The levels are below instrument detection limit.

Chemical analysis for lettuce plantKPN*As * Pb * Cd Farm no. % (ppb) ( ppm ) Dry weight basis Fresh weight basis 12.09 0.65 3.50 10.76 0.20 0.05 11 11.50 0.62 3.31 12.76 0.25 0.04 12 7.59 0.61 2.56 12.78 0.12 0.03 13 Table 4: Average values of the heavy metals ( Cd , Pb ), metalloid (As) and nutrients (N, P and K) content of lettuce plant (iceberg type) from three investigated farms. *The tolerable limits of Cd , Pb and As are 0.2, 0.3 and 1 mg kg -1 of fresh mass, respectively (EC, 2006).

CONCLUSIONSLettuce which was considered as an indicator plant for potential heavy metals contamination of vegetables was within the allowable levels of Cd and Pb (0.2 and 0.3 mg kg -1 of fresh weight for leafy vegetables, respectively).

CONCLUSIONSThe plant was, also, safe with respect to As as the level of this metalloid was much less than the established acceptable concentration of 1 mg kg-1 fresh mass.

CONCLUSIONS However, long term applications of P fertilizers (and pesticides) are likely sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils and crops in Jordan. This, essentially, may constitute a threat to the human health and surrounding environment.

RECOMMENDATIONSA national strategy should be developed and adopted in Jordan to monitor and minimize the concentration of the heavy metals and inputs into agricultural soils and their transfer to the plant crops.

RECOMMENDATIONSThis could help protect the environment from pollution and, thus, jeopardy to the human health could be reduced.

Thanks for your attention