/
NRF Evaluation & Rating NRF Evaluation & Rating

NRF Evaluation & Rating - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
383 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-05

NRF Evaluation & Rating - PPT Presentation

Prof Robert Morrell OVC previously Research Office 28 September 2016 amp 14 October 2016 What is an NRF rating Assessment of your recent research track record Based on the quality ID: 556047

nrf research reviewers outputs research nrf outputs reviewers rating researchers 2016 years uct 2009 reports categories peers quality reviewed

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "NRF Evaluation & Rating" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

NRF Evaluation & Rating

Prof. Robert Morrell – OVC (previously Research Office)

28 September 2016 & 14 October 2016Slide2

What is an NRF rating?

Assessment of your

recent

research track record.

Based on the

quality

of your research outputs.

International peer-review system.Slide3

Why be rated?

Access to NRF funding for 6 years.

Benchmarking. Assist UCT to improve its research profile.

Maintain publishing record.Slide4

NRF rating categories

Y, P

Researchers who show promise

to become established.

C, B, A

Established researchers.Slide5

NRF rating categories: Definitions

A

Researchers who are unequivocally recognised by their peers as

leading international scholars

in their field for the high quality and impact of their recent research outputs.

B

Researchers who

enjoy considerable international recognition

… for the high quality and impact of their recent research outputs.Slide6

NRF rating categories: Definitions

C

Established researchers

with a sustained recent record of productivity in the field.Slide7

NRF rating categories: Definitions

P Young researchers (normally younger than 35 years of age; doctorate or equivalent less than five years) who…are considered likely to

become future leaders in their field

.Slide8

NRF rating categories: Definitions

Y

Young researchers (40 years or younger; doctorate or equivalent less than five years) who are recognised as having the

potential to establish themselves as researchers

within a five-year period after evaluation.Slide9

How is your application processed?

Not accepted

Specialist Committee

Submission of scholarly achievements

Selection of

6 peers/reviewers

Joint meeting

Specialist Committee

Assessor

Reviewers’ reportsSlide10

How is your application processed? [2]

Appeal

Joint meeting

Consensus

No Consensus

Inform Applicant

Appeals Committee

E

xecutive

E

valuation

C

ommittee

B, C, Y

A, P recommendationSlide11

Tasks of specialist committees

Selecting reviewers.

Rating

the quality of reports

by reviewers

.

Deciding the rating value of each reviewer report

Recommending a rating for each applicant based solely on reports by reviewers.

Identifying feedback.

Advising NRF.Slide12

Peers/reviewers

Applicants are given the opportunity to nominate their own reviewers.

They are also given the opportunity to indicate who should not be approached.

A mix of national and international reviewers is appropriate in most cases.

Ideological differences within disciplines in the social sciences and humanities could confound the selection of suitable peers. However, reports by peers in such instances should be identifiable and treated appropriately by wise panel members.Slide13

What do reviewers comment on?

Quality

of research outputs over the last

eight years (2009-2016).

Impact

of research outputs on the field.

Standing

as a researcher, nationally and internationally.

Coherence

of researcher’s work.Slide14

Information required by NRF

Personal details

Biographical sketch (1 page)

Career

profile

Description of completed research (2 pages)

Qualifications

obtained

Self-assessment (1 page)

Research expertise

Ongoing and planned future research (1 page)

Research outputs of last eight years (2009-2016)

Six

nominated reviewers

Five best recent research outputs (2009-2016)

Assessment panel(s)

Ten best research outputs before 2009Slide15

Publications in peer-reviewed journals

Technical reports

Books/chapters in books

Patents, artefacts and products

Peer-reviewed published conference proceedings

Keynote/Plenary addresses

Other significant conference outputs

Other recognised research outputs

Best outputs from students supervised in last 8 years

Emphasis on peer-review and accessibility of outputs to reviewers

Research outputs of the last 8 years

1 Jan. 2009 to 31 Dec. 2016Slide16

Definition of research

For purposes of the NRF, research is original investigation undertaken to gain knowledge and/or enhance understanding.

Research specifically includes:

the creation and development of the intellectual infrastructure of subjects and disciplines

(e.g. through dictionaries, scholarly editions, catalogues and contributions to major research databases);

the invention or generation of ideas, images, performances and artefacts where these manifestly embody new or substantially developed insights;

building on existing knowledge to produce new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, policies or processes.

It specifically excludes:

routine testing and analysis of materials, components, instruments and processes, as distinct from the development of new analytical techniques.

the development of teaching materials and teaching practices that do not embody substantial original enquiry.Slide17

Five best recent research outputs (2009-2016)

Prepare e-copies of five best outputs

Upload these to the online systemSlide18

Applying online: https://nrfsubmission.nrf.ac.za/NrfMkII

Online system is open

Help

documents available at

http://

www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/nrf-ratings

Paul Dantu (

researchfunding@uct.ac.za

;

tel

650 1954/2689)Slide19

UCT Internal review

Closing date: 15 November 2016.

Applications reviewed by panel of specialists.

Feedback provided during Dec/Jan, with option to meet with panel member.

Final submission date: 15 February.

All applications must be reviewed internally, prior to submission to the NRF.

Research Office submits applications to the NRF.Slide20

Contacts

Paul.Dantu@uct.ac.za

or x1954/2689

Tamlyn.Mawa@uct.ac.za

or x2432

Research Office: 2 Rhodes Ave,

Mowbray

2017

Documents will be made available for download

from

http://

www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/nrf-ratings