/
Payment Challenges facing today’s nursing facilities Payment Challenges facing today’s nursing facilities

Payment Challenges facing today’s nursing facilities - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
353 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-21

Payment Challenges facing today’s nursing facilities - PPT Presentation

Source Proposed SNF Rule CMS 1351P Karen McDonald BSN RN KLM amp Associates LTC Consulting LLC Agenda Historical Payment System Medicare A RUGS IV 2012 Options Medicaid Challenges What Providers are Doing to Prepare ID: 692534

nursing rugs therapy medicaid rugs nursing medicaid therapy care rehab option 2011 increase residents medicare dependant based resident extensive

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Payment Challenges facing today’s nurs..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Payment Challenges facing today’s nursing facilities Source: Proposed SNF RuleCMS -1351-P

Karen McDonald, BSN, RN

KLM & Associates, LTC Consulting, LLCSlide2

AgendaHistorical Payment SystemMedicare A RUGS IV 2012 Options

Medicaid Challenges

What Providers are Doing to PrepareSlide3

Nursing Facility Stats15693 Facilities54.6% Multi - Facility Chains

45.4% Independent

6.6 % Hospital based

67.5 % For Profit

25.7 % Non Profit

5.8 % Government RunMedicare Only 5.0%Medicaid Only 3.9%Dual Certified 91.1%

AHCA Nursing Home “Operational” Characteristics Report March 2011Slide4

Nursing Facility Stats1,394,537 Patients and Residents in 1,671,226 Beds = 83.4% occupancy

6.48% beds are dedicated to specialized services

73.1% Alzheimer’s

13.1 % Rehab

Average Staffing

Direct Care 3.63 HPPDRN .39 HPPDLPN .82 HPPDNursing Assistants 2.42 HPPD

What does that mean?

On average, each resident in a 24 hour period received 2.42 hours of direct care from a Certified Nursing Assistant

AHCA Nursing Home “Operational” Characteristics Report March 2011Slide5

ResidentsSickerBiggerNeedierSlide6

Residents StatisticsKey Payer Sources14.2 % Medicare

63.6 % Medicaid

22.2 % Other

Skin Integrity

6.57 % with Pressure Ulcers

3.68 % upon Admission78.25% have Preventative Skin Care in placeAHCA Nursing Home “Residents” Characteristics Report March 2011

CMS Form 672Slide7

Funding / PaymentRemember Payer Breakdown?14.2 % Medicare63.6% Medicaid22.2 % Other

Currently Medicare Patients help to pay for Medicaid Residents

Shortfall anticipated at $17.33/day / Resident

Unreimbursed allowable Medicaid charges in 2010 5.6B

Medicare margins can no longer compensate for increasing Medicaid shortfalls

Elimination of FMPA (stimulus $$ July 1, 2011)State revenue up should be able to coverSlide8

Funding / PaymentMedicareTransitions of CareMore home careFunding to follow the resident

Anticipated 12.5% RUGS plus an additional 1.5% inflation factor adjustment, Oct. 2011

Case Mix is the game

ADL’s drive the payment in many state Medicaid programs and the Medicare programSlide9

Minimum Data Set (MDS)Mandated Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)Payment is based upon “groupers” (66)MedicareDay 5, 14, 30, 30, 30Medicaid (Case Mix Stated)

Quarterly after Part A stay

Rehab services are the driver for highest paymentSlide10

BackgroundJuly 1, 1998 (44 RUGS)SNF PPS per diem for all Medicare Part A routine, ancillary and capital related costsAdjusted to reflectWage rages

Patient case mix, RUGS (effort)

January 1, 2006 Refinements (53 RUGS)

Added 9 new categories

October 1, 2010 Refinements (66 RUGS)

MDS 3.0RUGS-III to RUGS-IV was mandated budget neutralSlide11

BackgroundOver ½ states utilize a RUGS based system for MedicaidMDS data drives the classificationNursing needsADL impairments

Cognitive status

Behavior problems

Medical diagnosis

Residents with more resource needs are assigned higher groups

Each October, CMS must issue new rates based upon “parity” and cost adjustmentsSlide12

RUGS-IVEight major classificationsRehabilitation Plus Extensive ServicesRehabilitationExtensive ServicesSpecial Care High

Special Care Low

Clinically Complex

Behavioral Symptoms

Cognitive Performance Problems

Reduced Physical FunctionSlide13

Rehab Plus Extensive 2 or more dependant ADLS

Receiving therapy

Has trach, vent, or infection isolation

Rehabilitation

2 or more dependant ADLS

Receiving therapyExtensive Services

2 or more dependant ADL’s

Trach, vent, or infection isolation

Special Care High

2 or more dependant ADL’s

Serious medical condition

Comatose, septic, DM, Quad, COPD, fever, IV, RT

Special Care Low

2 or more dependant ADL’s

CP, MS, Parkinson's etc all ADL dependantSlide14

Clinically Complex Pneumonia, hemiplegic, surgical or open wounds, burns, chemo, O2. IV, transfusions

Behavioral Symptoms and Cognitive Performance

ADL dependence of 5 or less

Behavior or cognitive problems

Reduce Physical Function

Residents who needs are primarily for support with activities of daily livingSlide15

So What is the Plan for FY 2012?Slide16

SNF Proposed RuleTwo OptionsOption A Recalibration of the Parity AdjustmentOption B Standard Update without RecalibrationSlide17

Option A RecalibrationBackgroundTo move from RUGS-III to RUGS-IV and stay budget neutral, CMS applied a 61% upward adjustment across all nursing CMI’s based upon analysis of 2009 dataComparable actual data available for quarter 1 2011 realized utilization patterns differed significantly from the projected

Number of residents grouped in the highest paying RUG therapy categories greatly exceeded expectations

Why?

Movement from concurrent to individualized therapySlide18

Option A RecalibrationBackgroundParity was not achieved and RUGS-IV triggered a significant increase in overall paymentsConclusionThe 61% increase would have to be lowered to 22.55% if applied equally across all CMI’s

Most change was reflected only in rehab groups, so the decrease only applies to the nursing CMI for the RUG-IV therapy groupsSlide19

Projected utilization was .18% of days, it was actually .60%

Projected utilization was lower or as expectedSlide20

Option A RecalibrationImpactIf parity decreased across the rehab groups and left as is for the others, the impact is an increase only to 19.81% for the rehab groups (not 61%) Results in a $4.47 billion change in reimbursement2012 market basket inflation adjustment is $530 million resulting in a net $3.94 billion savings to CMS or a net 11.3% decrease to nursing facilities Slide21

Option A RecalibrationIssuesUtilization of 1 quarter of dataIncrease coincides with movement to RUGS-IV and MDS 3.0Movement away from concurrent to individual and group therapy hence greater costs

SNF proposed rule would eliminate the existing incentive to substitute group therapy for concurrent and individualized therapy

CMS maintains that concurrent therapy should be the exception, group only 25% but they did not anticipate the cost of moving to individual therapySlide22

Option B Update without RecalibrationRecognizing that this increase may be a temporary aberrance resulting from the limited 2011 data, the movement to RUGS-IV and the MDS 3.0They reserve the option to do nothing except normal wage index and market basket changesNeither plan reflects changes to the AIDS add onSlide23

Comparable RatesRUG-IV

Urban-A

Urban-B

Rural-A

Rural-B

RUX735.16882.55

752.19

893.01

RVX

654.35

798.53

596.61

798.67

RHX

592.85

733.83

530.66

726.59

RMX

498.97

678.39

537.89

666.47

RUC

557.34

643.85

582.28

664.94

RVC

478.13

559.83

492.53

570.59

RHC

416.63

495.13

423.51

498.52

RMC

366.00

441.30

367.99

439.93

RLB

355.85

437.55

351.85

429.91

ES3

671.15

671.18

648.24

648.24Slide24

DistributionRehab plus Extensive Urban 2.65%Rural 2.09 %RehabUrban 89.32 %Rural 87.82%

Extensive Services

Urban .58%

Rural .45%Slide25

Medicaid FMAP Funds decrease to many states on July 1, 2011Anticipated state revenues better than expected hence proposed Medicaid cuts not as great as expectedBottom line, if Medicare Part A rates cut and any Medicaid cut, the impact is great to any facilitySlide26

How are Providers Preparing?LobbyAHCA and The Alliance for Quality Health CareAttacking on the employment sideLTC represents the 2

nd

largest employer in the nations health care sector

Data integrity, how can they base on 1 quarter

Revenue side

Increase the acuity of the resident admitted to increase the Rehab plus Extensive patient loadDecrease returns to hospital, close the back doorExpense sideBudgeted $PPD’sChanging mix of staffDecreasing overhead at “corporate” or management levelSlide27

Bottom Line SNF Rule remains out for commentAnticipate Option A will be passedSlide28

Questions and answers