/
Reading Like a Historian Reading Like a Historian

Reading Like a Historian - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
461 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-15

Reading Like a Historian - PPT Presentation

Sourcing Contextualization Corroboration SourcingBefore reading the Document What type of document is it When was it written Who wrote it Was it really written on that day Document A Barker Modified ID: 320117

fired document men lexington document fired lexington men people april clock british students time minutemen intending town common formed

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Reading Like a Historian" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Reading Like a Historian

Sourcing, Contextualization, CorroborationSlide2

Sourcing-Before reading the Document

What type of document is it?

When was it written?

Who wrote it?

Was it really written on that day?Slide3

Document

A: Barker (Modified)

19th

. At 2 o’clock we began our march

by wading through a very long stream

up to our middles. About 5 miles away from a town called Lexington, we heard there were some hundreds of people collected together intending to oppose us. At 5 o’clock we arrived there and

saw a number of people, I believe between 200 and 300,

formed in a common in the middle of the town. We still continued advancing, prepared for an attack though without intending to attack them. As we came near them

, they fired

one or two shots, upon which our men without any orders, fired and put them to flight. We then formed on the Common, but with some difficulty, the men were so wild they could hear no orders; we waited a considerable time there, and at length proceeded on our way to Concord.

Source: Entry for April 19th, 1775, from the diary of Lieutenant John Barker, an officer in the British

army.

Battle

of LexingtonSlide4

Contextualization

Asks

students

to locate

items in a document such as:

Time

and place

To

understand how these factors shape its content.

Contextualization helps

students when reading a document to

ask certain questions.Slide5

Contextualization helps students, when reading a document to ask:

When

and

where

was the document created

?

What was

different

then?

What was the

same

?

In creating the document how might the circumstances

affect

it’s content?Slide6

You Imagine the setting

What was it like

to be alive in the past?

What things were

different

back then?

What things were the

same

?

What did people and places

look like

back then?

What were people

worried about

or

hoping for

?Slide7

Document

A: Barker (Modified)

19th

. At 2 o’clock we began our march

by wading through a very long stream

up to our middles. About 5 miles away from a town called Lexington, we heard there were some hundreds of people collected together intending to oppose us. At 5 o’clock we arrived there and

saw a number of people, I believe between 200 and 300,

formed in a common in the middle of the town. We still continued advancing, prepared for an attack though without intending to attack them. As we came near them

, they fired

one or two shots, upon which our men without any orders, fired and put them to flight. We then formed on the Common, but with some difficulty, the men were so wild they could hear no orders; we waited a considerable time there, and at length proceeded on our way to Concord.

Source: Entry for April 19th, 1775, from the diary of Lieutenant John Barker, an officer in the British

army.

Battle

of LexingtonSlide8

Modeling for studentsSlide9

wading through a very long stream

This

makes me think and realize that the soldiers were probably cold, wet and tired. Slide10

saw

a number of people, I believe between 200 and 300

,

I

bet when they saw so many minutemen they were jumpy and nervous. That is a lot of minutemen

.

Did the text book say how many minutemen there were

?

I am just

wondering:

Could

he just

be imagining

that there were a lot of

minutemen?

There was a lot going on at that time.Slide11

they fired…

This

British soldier

makes it clear

who fired

first.

The soldier stated The colonists shot first.

I just wonder if he is telling the truth about this

. He

might be covering his back

.

If the battle ended up starting the war, you can bet there would be an investigation into who fired first.Slide12

What should students be able to do?

Use context/background information to

draw

more meaning from document

Infer

historical context from document(s)

Understand

that documents reflects one moment in changing past

Beware

that words must be understood in a larger contextSlide13

Document B:

Mulliken

(Modified)

We

Nathaniel

Mulliken

, Philip Russell, (Followed by the names of 32 other men present on Lexington Green on April 19, 1775)...All of lawful age, and inhabitants of Lexington...do testify and declare, that on the nineteenth of April, about five o’clock in the morning, we proceeded towards the Green, and saw a large body of troops marching towards us. Some of our men were coming to the Green, and others had reached it, at which time, they began to disperse. While our backs were turned on the British troops, they fired on us, and a number of our men were instantly killed and wounded, not a gun was fired by any person in our company on the British soldiers to our knowledge before they fired on us, and continued firing until we had all made our escape.

Lexington, April 25, 1775.

Source: Sworn by 34 minutemen on April 25 before three Justices of the Peace.

Battle of LexingtonSlide14

Corroboration-comparing two documents

Which account do you find more reliable?

Why?

Are

ther

any facts that both accounts agree on?