/
t from western conceptions of theolo-gical anthropology but one that s t from western conceptions of theolo-gical anthropology but one that s

t from western conceptions of theolo-gical anthropology but one that s - PDF document

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
389 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-06

t from western conceptions of theolo-gical anthropology but one that s - PPT Presentation

s of the most religion and religious studie Moscow State University Moscow CIS 1 Cf Philokalia ID: 392935

the most religion

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "t from western conceptions of theolo-gic..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

t from western conceptions of theolo-gical anthropology but one that sounds very strange indeed to our ears. In the Philokalia, an s of the most religion and religious studie Moscow State University, Moscow, CIS. 1 Cf. Philokalia (Žd. G. E. H. Palmer, P. Sherrard and K. Ware; London: Faber and Faber, 1979-1984) 2.43. 2 C. Stavropoulos, Partakers of Divine Nature (Minneapolis: Light and Life, 1976) 17-18. 3 Gregory Nazianzus, "Funeral Oratio Y The purpose of this article is to n about his feelings of insignificance that David assumes central importance in its overall theological framework. Like a continuous golden thread running throughout th th l rule, although even in Climacus the theme is not entirely absent. It is th n is "the very essence of Christianity," for it describes me descended, assumed humanity schola general and Prot-estants in particular have given only scant attention to the centra the doctrine at length The Deification of Man (Crestwood St Vladimir's Seminary, 1984) 12, 129 5 Gregor Nazianzus To Thallasius 60, cf " Chrestou, Partakers of o University o ORTHODOX DOCTRINE OF THEOSI an they insist d to accent on legal concepts the enormous influenc t (where the work o n and s of the served by making a "satisfaction" or just payment of the penalty. With only a little work we coul betwee THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY would stand or fall with this doctrine, and in his treatise entitled Two Types of Righteousness he developed the idea of our external passiv e different from notions of mystical union with Christ. Calvin de-scribed s of divine justice: "Just as a man, deemed innocent by an im-partial judge, is said to re l theo-logical. Three qualifications are worth noting. First, if that Paul himself uses, as Stamoolis, Lossky other Orthodox theolo-gians acknowledge, then this way of interpreting the work of Christ is hardly a distortion or unduly negative an categories are eminentl ar d the wonder of God's salvation in Christ. Third, the y of Christ as "deified man." Catho-lic reformer Peter Dami‡n (1007-72) cites 2 Pet4 and notes that Christ "ascended inr t 5 A notable exception ise Confession by Cyril Lucanus (1572-1638), articles 9 and 1 s with God. Nygren sees thee in some Reformation people.17 Further, the west has a s being engrafted into or bonde th th : "Even so, al up for the things that transcen d to dominate but rather be Christ.20 Nevertheless a difference of emphasis is still a genuine difference. Th th Bible speaks extensively about theosis, accordin the Orthodox theologians, and thus so must we. The two most direct texts are 2 Pet 1: y of Chicago, 1978) 152, Imago Vladimir's Seminary, 1989) 111 Cf also J Karmins, Synopsis of the Y out of, or thate doctrine in an array of Biblical texts is un-convincing, Orthodox theologians would care little. True exegesis seeks to perceive the hidden meaning of Scripture that lies beyond or beneath the literals of the text. Sticking to the "mere letter" of Scripture only proves l interpretation" of God's Word.22 Further, since the tradition of the Church fathers speaks so definitively about the matter, the Biblical pro-priety o theosi claims a "solid biblical basis" that goes far beyond the two explicit texts in 2 Pe transfiguration of Pe-ter on Mount Tabor (Matt 17:4) parallel g on these ) writes that Christ "be-came what we are, Th Various Texts on Theology 4 76, cf Philokalia 2 Macarios of Philadelphia, in Nicodemos of the Holy Mountain made divine Paul spoke of "the riches" of the saints, this, too, meant deification.30 In addition to the passages alread mentioned, Symeon the New Theologian appeals to a broad array of other Biblical texts when he expounds the doc-trine of theosis (1 Co 6:15; Col 3:1; Titus 2:13).31 To these Biblical texts we can add the historical witnes n as divinization. g to Origen, when we transcend the material realm the contemplation of God is brought to "its e . . . , deifies by grace those who still belong to a nature subject to" According to Gregory of , The Discourses (New York: Paulist, 1980) 207, 336, 361. 3 V. Lossky, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (Crestwood: St. Vladimir's Semi-nary, 1976) 134. 33 See V. Lossky, The Vision of God (Crestwood: St. Vladimir's Seminary, 1973) 42, 61-62. 34 Basil On the Holy Spirit 1.2; Gregory of Nyssa Oratio Catechetica 25 in Lossky, Vision 80; Gregory Nazianzus Poem, dogma 10.5-9 in, Mystical 134; Letter to Cledonius in Karmiris, Synopsis 70 d to participate in divinity. the middle ages John of Psellu invoke , there i No yo , O Lord, Thy divin-ity with our humanity and our humanity with Thy divinity, Thy life with oury and our mortality with Thy life; Thou hast received what was ours St th Hi Son who put hi order to grant him hi beautiful the servant's deformity, an aphoristic. In his Hymn on Faith he puts the whole matter succinctly enough Ware, Orthodox 130!132 40 Ode 4, Tropanon 3, cf Ware, Orthodox 236 41 Cf $ Arseniev, Mysticism and the Eastern Church (Crestwood St Vladimir's Seminary found."43 Palamas, who devoted ane treatise to the subject, is never-theless reluctant toe the indescribable: Althoug e but in its , Deification 127 5 M‡ximos, Various Texts on Theology 4 19, cf nature That which is of God is that which has been lifted up to a greater glory, without its own nature being changed."47 John of Da-mascus distinguished betwee man was endivinized. Bu 50 I have taken these terms from the Philokalia 51 M‡ximos, Various Texts on Theology 1 62, cf yeast with a lump of dough, or to red-ho iron penetrated by fire.54 Finally, M‡xi-mos likens theosi in the Augustinian tradition. They hold, most certainly, that all people are sinful and than guilt, in Adam we have inherite death, mortalit and corruption. "The first man brough universa death, t distinction: Thes of Adam y did not inherit Adam's guilt, as. Augustine taught in the West; for, according to the view of , from incorruption Vision 98. 55 M‡ximos 58 Anastasios o L SOCIETY gods by adoption and grace. Inh of the passages of nature we are mortal being incorrupt, ye would henceforth be as God, as Hol said, "Ye are gods and sons of the highest, all of you'"" (Ps 82:6). Through the death of Christ deathlessness has been manifest and through his shame we inheri LIKENESS The eastern fathers also define theosis as th of Photiki, M‡ximos, John of, Palamas and others wen say that every person ise in the divine im-age but that only a few attain the transformation y to our rationality and capacity for free choice. The likeness of, on the other hand, signifies a potential similitude to God thats our free cooperation with God's. The image might be thought of as potential likeness, and the likeness asd image.62 The image is, the likeness dynamic. As we cooperate with God's grace he renews the distorted image in us so that we attain the likeness and conse-quently become godlike. Basil observes that "the image was given to us in our nature, and it is unchangeable; from and voli-tion; [it] exists potentially in us, and is energized throug you receive the likeness of Go e of we move from the divine image t e all the many perfections that God alone possesses by nature and. In Discourses 337 60 Athanasius On Theology 1 13, John of Damascus e from image to likeness we are deified, accord-ing to the words of from sin to salvation through deification. VII. CASE STUDY: THE PHILOKALIA I have already anticipated the most practical of questions: Exactl according to its compiler Nicodemos, thet itself of6 ) was first published in Venice in2 and later in y of texts written b s of each author. By many . 67 Irenaeus Against Heresies 5.16.2; cf t cultural perspectives, is this manner we inherit eternal life as a consequence of both grace and justice We do not reach the final stage of spiritual maturity throug divine power and grace alone, without ourselve does not build the house, it is said, and protec the city, in vain does the watchman keep awake, and in vain do the labourer and builder work 70 Thus faith without works and works without faith are equally rejected (James). In Paulin Christian life is a strenuous battle, fierce drama, or "open contest" (Theoretikon), and responds accordingly. Such vigilance will expres dispassion ande through bodily ascet-icism (fasting, vigils, prostrations, tears, repentance).71h such dis-passion we will attain anr 228 virtues and 29 Knowledge, cf Philokalia 3 2-3-206, or gladly s be with "conscious awareness" and not mere. Related to both dispassion an prayer commandment whethe the Orthodox fathers of the Philokalia, s attainment of likeness to God, in so far as this i Philokalia 3 372 76 M‡ximos, On the Lord's Prayer, Various