Cockle Park Results 2019 Significant difference between Conventional and Biological and untreated No significant differences between treatments other than untreated Cockle Park Results 2019 Significant difference between Conventional untreated and IPM Biological ID: 933631
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "YAS Results 2019 Individual sites and cu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
YAS Results 2019
Individual sites and cumulative
Slide2Slide3Slide4Slide5Slide6Slide7Slide8Cockle Park Results 2019
Significant difference between Conventional and Biological – and untreated
No significant differences between treatments other than untreated
Slide9Cockle Park Results 2019
Significant difference between Conventional / untreated and IPM / Biological
No significant differences between treatments other than untreated
Slide10Cockle Park Results 2019
Significant difference in HLW between Conventional / untreated and IPM / Biological
No significant differences between treatments - TGW
Slide11Cockle Park Field Scale Results 2019
TGW
HLW
Protein
BIO
45.45
71.39
10.59
Conv
44.32
71.71
10.66
Slide12STC Results 2019
Sundance RL plots:
Untreated – 10.66 T/ha
Treated – 12.99 T/ha
Sundance RL plots:
%
Septoria
Untreated – 12
%
Septoria
Treated – 0.73
RL Results
Yield t/ha @
GS 83
GS 83
14% moisture
% Septoria
% GLA
Untreated
10.66
12
65
Treated
12.99
0.73
86.67