disclose Discussion of offlabel drug use not applicable 56 th ASH Annual Meeting Disclosure Statement Milestonebased Assessment The Pediatric HematologyOncology Approach Jennifer Kesselheim MD ID: 929978
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Jennifer Kesselheim, MD Nothing to" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Jennifer Kesselheim, MD
Nothing to discloseDiscussion of off-label drug use: not applicable
56
th
ASH Annual Meeting
Disclosure Statement
Slide2Milestone-based Assessment:
The Pediatric Hematology-Oncology ApproachJennifer Kesselheim, MD, EdMASH Program Directors’ WorkshopDecember 5, 2014
Slide351 sub competencies in pediatrics
15 EPAsClinical Competency CommitteesRequirement to report to ACGME on 21 milestones every 6 months for every fellow starting in this academic yearHow do we optimally support program directors???
The Next Accreditation System (NAS)
Slide4Formed to provide guidance and resources to pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) program directors
Subgroup of the Program Directors’ CommitteeApproximately 10 members, 1 fellowASPHO EPA/Milestones Task Force
Slide5Tasks
Work on subspecialty-specific EPAsDevelop assessment instruments to measure the milestonesAvailable to any programAvoid reinventing the wheelDetermine how the sub competencies and EPAs relate to one anotherGather data to measure outcomes of transitionASPHO EPA/Milestones Task Force
Slide6No current plans to require reporting on EPAs
Discussion about EPAs tabled for nowEntrustment is the subject of a research study happening in pediatric subspecialtiesMore on that below…
ASPHO EPA/Milestones Task Force
Slide7Patient Care
: 135Medical knowledge: 21Interpersonal Communication: 6 3Practice-based Learning and Improvement:10 4Professionalism: 5 1Systems based Practice: 7
5
Personal and
P
rofessional Development
: 8
3
21 Sub competencies for Reporting
Slide8The Task force identified 5 additional competencies (red) we believed essential to the training of a PHO, raising total number to 26.
PC-3
Transfers in care
PC6
Exhibits good clinical judgment
PC7
Construct a management plan
PC8
P
rocedures
PC12
R
ole
modeling
PC13
S
upervision
MK2
A
pplied
knowledge
PBLI1
Self-identify
deficiencies
PLBI4
QI, improve
practice
mgmt
PBLI7
Information technology
PBLI9
E
ducate patients
ICS-1
Communicate to patients
ICS3
Communicate in
profession
ICS4
L
ead
team
ICS5
C
onsult
P-conduct
Professional conduct
P-humanism
Humanism in
medicine
SBP1
H
ealth
care setting
SBP2
M
ed
home
SBp3
C
ost
/risk-benefit
SBP5
T
eam
safety/qi
SBP6
S
ystem
errors/
soln
PPD2
C
oping mechanisms
PPD5
Trustworthiness
PPD6
Leadership
PPD8
A
mbiguity
Slide9No one wants to fill out an assessment form with 26 items!
Variable relevance of sub competenciesInpatient vs. outpatient settingsDifferent PGY levelsConducted survey of PHO program directorsSignificant overlap in rotations and curriculaThe Challenge of Implementation
Slide10Distribute competencies among different rotations/ fellowship activities
InpatientOutpatient/ConsultsContinuity clinicTeaching conferencesResearchProcedures360 evaluationsAllow more advanced competencies to be assessed laterAllow crucial competencies to be assessed frequently
Spreading the Wealth
Slide11Inpatient
Consult/Outpt
A
B
C
D
E
F
PC6
PC6
PC6
PC6
PC6
PC6
PC6
PBLI7
PC7
PC7
PC7
PC7
PC7
PC7
ICS5
PC3MK2PC12PBLI7PC13PC12P-conICS1PBLI1PC13PLBI9P-conICS4P-hum PPD6Continuity Clinic360ConferencesABCDSBP1MK2MK2MK2MK2MK2SBP5PLBI4ICS1PBLI1ICS1P-humSPB6PBLI9ICS3PBLI9ICS3SBP2PPD2ICS3P-conP-humP-conPPD5PPD5 SBP3PPD8PPD6ProceduresPPD8PC8
First-Year Evaluation Forms
Slide12Continuity
360
Inpatient/Outpatient/Consult
A
B
ICS1
PC3
PC6
PC6
ICS3
PC8
PC7
PC12
SBP1
ICS4
PC13
MK2
SBP5
ICS5
P-con
P-hum
SPB6
SBP2
SBP3PPD2PPD6PPD8PPD5PPD6ResearchPPD8PLB1PLBI7ConferencesPBLI9MK2ICS3PLBI4P-conPBLI9PPD2ICS3Upper-Level Evaluation Forms
Slide13Evaluation Source:
Inpatient
Continuity
Consult/Outpt
Procedures
Conferences
360
Research
CCC
Frequency:
qRotation
q3 month
qRotation
q6 mo
As appropriate
q6
mo
q6
mo
q6 mo
Minimumq2 moq3 mo q6 mo Competency PC3Transfer of careA PC6Clinical judgmentAll X PC7Management plansAll PC8*Procedures X PC12Role modelingC,F PC13*SupervisionC,E MK2EBMB
All
X PBLI1Self -knowledgeBB PLBI4QI X PBLI7Information technologyD X PBLI9Educate othersDB X ICS1*Communication: pts/publicAA.C ICS3Communication:professional A,C X ICS4Team leadershipF ICS5Consultant role X P-con Professional ConductEA,CX P-hum*Humanism B.DX SBP1Work in health care system X SBP2Coordinate care D SBP3Cost/risk-benefit analysis C SBP5Interprofessional teams X SBP6ID and solve system errors X PPD2*Healthy coping mechanisms X PPD5Trustworthiness in pt care D X PPD6Leadership skillsF X PPD8Tolerance of ambiguity D X
First-Year Evaluation Matrix
* Not yet required for ACGME reporting
Slide14Distilling Down to Essentials
Is reluctant to use information technology. Is unable to prioritize information retrieved.
Has basic EBM and EHR skills but is not able to use them with ease and facility.
Efficiently retrieves and utilizes information for medical decision making.
Habitually uses
information for medical decision making for patients and populations.
Contributes to development and improvement of information technology for patient care and/or professional learning.
Uses information technology to optimize learning and care delivery (PBLI 7)
Slide15First-year
Fellow Evaluation Form: Inpatient
Slide16How could you use the
Heme-Onc Milestones as an “item bank” to create meaningful evaluations aligned with the purpose of the curricular experience?Small Group Exercise
Slide17At 2014 ASPHO annual meeting, we led a workshop open to program directors, associate program directors, and teaching faculty
Faculty Development
Slide18Workshop Objectives
Describe the theory behind EPAs and CBME and the assessment instruments developed by the task forcePlan their own program’s implementation of CBME with guidance from a worksheet and task force membersBecome facile with faculty development modules, disseminated during the workshop, for use at home institution
Slide19Hour 1
: Didactic presentationPrinciples of the Next Accreditation SystemStructure and function of the CCC Orientation to new assessment instruments created by task forceHour 2: Small group workHow will you implement new assessments in your program?Hour 3: Training the trainerStrategies for faculty development at homeReview of PowerPoint module created by task forceWorkshop Format
Slide20Pre-test administered to registrants (N=37)
Repeated as post-test (N=38)Rate agreement with 6 different item stemsEvaluation Data
Slide21Slide22Slide23Council of Pediatric Subspecialties
How are entrustment decisions being made?Measure program directors’ assessments of entrustment on each EPA (standard) Compare to CCC entrustment decisions derived from sub competencies and milestonesDetermine which sub competencies most influentialParticipation8 subspecialties, 15 PHO programs, ~500 fellowsIRB approval at hospital levelData collection in progressCollaborative Research
Slide24Mark Atlas, MDTask Force members
ASPHO leadership and staffFunded 2 in-person meetingsAllocated time and space during annual meetingsConveyed fellowship training as major priorityAcknowledgments