Rajesh TotaMaharaj Michael J Blaha Ron Blankstein Leslee J Shaw Roger S Blumenthal Matthew J Budoff Khurram Nasir No disclosures for this presentation ID: 930609
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Coronary Artery Calcium Predicts Coronar..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Coronary Artery Calcium Predicts Coronary Heart Disease Events Even at the Extremes of Age: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Rajesh
Tota-Maharaj
, Michael J
Blaha
,
Ron
Blankstein
,
Leslee
J Shaw,
Roger
S Blumenthal,
Matthew
J
Budoff
,
Khurram
Nasir
.
No disclosures for this presentation.
Slide2Incidence of MI in USA: 935,000 (ARIC +CHS from NHLBI)
Annual cost: $177 billion in 2007.
Significance of refining CHD risk stratification.
Background
Slide3AHA/ACC 2010: Intermediate-risk patients (Class IIA).Superior to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in risk stratification.
? Expanded utility of coronary calcium scoring in the future.
Coronary Calcium in risk-stratification
- Greenland, et al: 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults. JACC 2010;56(25):e50-103.
-
Blaha
, et al: Associations between C-reactive protein, coronary artery calcium, and cardiovascular events: implications for the JUPITER population from MESA, a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378: 684–92.
Slide4Background
Tota-Maharaj
R,
Blaha
MJ, Muse ED, Blumenthal RS,
Budoff
MJ, Shaw LJ, Berman DS,
Rana
JS,
Nasir
K.
The Utility of Coronary Artery Calcium in Predicting Mortality at Extremes of Age. Presented at ACC 2011.
Slide5Coronary artery calcium will be an independent predictor of CHD events even at the extremes of age, after adjusting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors.
Hypothesis
Slide6MESA study design: 6809 patients, 4 ethnic groups, who had coronary artery calcium scoring performed for risk stratification.Median followup
of 5.8 years.
Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, angina and coronary revascularization.
Methodology
Bild
, et al: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design. Am J
Epidemiol
2002;156:871–881.
Slide7Age groups: 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84. Coronary artery calcium was stratified as: CAC=0, CAC 1-100, CAC >100. Population characteristics: baseline and examination and followup
phone calls.
CHD events: confirmed with clinical documentation, deaths reviewed by MESA’s M+M committee.
Methodology
Slide8% patients with CAC across increasing age groups was calculated. CHD events (%) within age groups, CAC groups, and combined.CHD events calculated per 1000 person/years, and stratified across age groups and CAC.
Kaplan-Meier curves.
Methodology
Slide9Cox regression analyses: within age groups and for increasing CAC.Hazard ratios: 4 models with increasing multi-variable adjustment.Hazard ratios calculated for each CAC category within each age group.
Methodology
Slide10Characteristic
Age
45-54
N= 1947
Age
55-64
N= 1882
Age
65-74
N= 2015
Age
75-84
N=965
P value
Male (no., %)
909/47
881/47
962/48
458/48
0.90
Caucasian
723/37711/38795/40390/400.14Chinese224/12222/12236/12121/13African-American536/28519/28584/29253/26Hispanic464/24430/23400/20201/21Tobacco: Never Former Current1001/52916/49964/48535/56< 0.0001575/30672/36858/43379/39367/19289/15184/947/5Family History705/38797/45843/45385/44< 0.0001
Baseline Characteristics
Slide11Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic
Age 45-54
Age 55-64
Age 65-74
Age 75-84
P value
Hypertension
479/25
790/42
1156/57
631/65
< 0.0001
SBP
117
(
17)
125 (20)
132
(22)
138 (23)< 0.0001DM149/8248/13307/15152/16< 0.0001LDL118 (31)119 (33)116 (31)114 (31)0.0003HDL50 (14)51 (15)52 (15)52 (15)< 0.0001BMI29 (6)29 (6)28 (5)27 (5)< 0.0001Heart rate63 (9)63 (10)63 (10)63 (10)0.09Lipid meds144/7294/16456/23202/21< 0.0001BP meds
394/20
653/35
977/49
509/53
< 0.0001
Slide12Coronary Calcium Distribution across Age groups
Indices of Coronary Calcium increase with aging.
Slide13CHD Event Rate per 1000 person-years
CHD events increase with increasing age group
Events increase with increasing coronary calcium as expected, but exhibit a much higher event rate with CAC>100.
Slide14CHD Event Rate per 1000 person-years: Stratified by CAC within Age groups
In all age groups, CHD event rate increases with CAC 1-100, and CAC >100.
CAC > 100 imparts a poorer prognosis in terms of incident CHD events throughout all age groups.
Slide15Survival analyses for CAC as a function of each age group
Slide16Survival analyses for CAC as a function of each age group
Slide17Hazard Ratio for CHD Events across Age Groups: Multi-variable Adjustment
Age Group (compared to age 45-54)
Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
P values
(Model 4)
Age 55-64
2.9 (1.8-4.5)
2.9 (1.8-4.5)
2.2 (1.4-3.5)
1.7 (1.1-2.7)
0.03
Age 65-74
4.3 (2.8-6.6)
4.2 (2.8-6.5)
3.1 (2.0-5.0)
1.7 (1.1-2.8)
0.02
Age 75-846.3 (4.0-9.8)6.3 (4.0-9.9)4.4 (2.7-7.2)1.9 (1.2-3.3)0.01 Model 1: unadjusted Model 2: adjusted for gender, ethnicity and MESA site Model 3: Model 2 + hypertension, diabetes mellitus, LDL, HDL, smoking, family history, BMI, mean heart rate, hypertensive + lipid-lowering meds. Model 4: Model 3 adjusted for coronary artery calcium. All p-values except those shown are ≤ 0.0001.
Slide18CAC Group (compared to CAC=0)
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
CAC 1-100
4.6 (3.0-7.1)
4.4 (2.9-6.7)
2.94 (1.9-4.6)
CAC >100
13.8 (9.4-20.3)
12.4 (8.4-18.5)
8.0 (5.3-12.0)
Hazard Ratio for CHD Events across CAC groups
For both CAC 1-100 and CAC >100, the risk for CHD events remains elevated compared to CAC=0 even after multi-variable adjustment.
Slide19Age Group
Coronary Calcium Score
Hazard Ratio (95%
CI)
Model 1
Model 2
45-54
CAC 1-100
3.5 (1.3-9.8)
1.8 (0.6-5.4)
CAC >100
18.5 (7.4-45.9)
8.3 (2.8-24.1)
55-64
CAC 1-100
4.0 (1.9-8.5)
2.1 (0.9-4.7)
CAC >100
14.5 (7.2-28.9)
7.9 (3.8-16.7)
65-74
CAC 1-1004.0 (1.9-8.0)
2.9 (1.4-6.0)
CAC >100
7.6 (3.9-14.7)
4.7 (2.3-9.5)
75-84
CAC 1-100
3.8 (0.8-16.8)
3.0 (0.6-14.1)
CAC >100
11.61 (2.83-47.6)
8.8 (2.1-36.9)
HAZARD RATIOS FOR CHD EVENTS IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS STRATIFIED BY CAC
Within each age group, increasing CAC is independently predictive of events.
After adjusting for risk factors, CAC is still a powerful tool in the
youngest
and
oldest
age groups to predict events.
Slide20Discussion
Guidelines have changed drastically over the last 10 years.
While coronary calcium screening has been endorsed for intermediate risk patients, its use in specific populations remains unclear.
Slide21Most contemporary risk-scoring algorithms are heavily weighted in favor of increasing age. Many older individuals are classified as intermediate and high-risk, primarily on the basis of age. Rotterdam study
Raggi
et al
The Elderly
-
Vliegenthart
et al: Coronary Calcium Score Improves Classification of Coronary Heart Disease Risk in the Elderly: The Rotterdam Study. J Am
Coll
Cardiol
2010;56:1407–14.
-
Raggi
et al: Coronary Artery Calcium to Predict All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Men and Women. J Am
Coll
Cardiol
2008;52:17–23.
Slide221795 patients, mean age 71.1 ± 5.7.Median followup 3.3 years.
The Elderly- Rotterdam
Vliegenthart
, et al: Coronary Calcification Improves Cardiovascular Risk
Prediction in the Elderly. Circulation 2005;112: 572-577.
Slide2335,388 patients, mean age 70.Median followup of 5.8 years.
Similar to Rotterdam, there remains the potential
to reclassify patients into a more appropriate group.
The Elderly-
Raggi
et al
Raggi
, et al: Coronary Artery Calcium to Predict All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Men and Women. J Am
Coll
Cardiol
2008;52:17–23.
Slide24When compared to other studies, MESA also demonstrates that increasing CAC is independently associated with CHD events in the 75-84 age group.Most, but not all of the excess risk may be accounted for by CAC and not chronological age.
↑ CAC represents an increased burden of atherosclerosis, including unstable mixed calcified plaque which may account for the increased incidence of CHD events.
The Elderly- MESA
Slide25MESA: Risk Factors vs CAC
Silverman et al: Impact of Coronary Artery Calcium on Coronary Heart Disease Events
In Individuals at the Extremes of Traditional Risk Factor Burden: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Slide2619% of patients in the 75-84 age group had NO coronary artery calcium. Event rate of 2.1/1000 person-years (1.1%).Hazard ratio compared to CAC=0 in the 45-54 age group: 2.1 (0.4-10.63).
Raggi
, et al: Annual mortality rate of 2.2% for CAC=0 in patients ≥ 70 years old.44,000 cohort: Annual mortality rate of 2.8/1000 person-years for CAC=0 in patients ≥ 75 years old.
Zero CAC in the Elderly
Slide27Young Persons
Framingham Offspring
CAC >100 in 45-55 age group: 12%.
CARDIA
Any CAC in 33-45 age group: 1.5%.
PACC
N=1983, mean age 43.
CAC ≥45: 6.7%.
7/364 with CAC had an event.
HR
for CHD event for CAC ≥45: 4.8.
44,000
cohort
Prevalence
of CAC >100 in <45 age group: 4%.
HR for CAC 100-400: 6.6
HR for CAC >400: 10.8.
MESA
Prevalence of CAC
>100 in 45-55 age group: 7.3%. HR of CHD events in this group: 8.3 (2.8-24.1).
Slide28Accurate means of improving cardiovascular risk stratification in elderly patients.Beneficial in discriminating CHD risk in young persons, who may be asymptomatic yet have a significant atherosclerotic burden.
Conclusion